Analytics/Experimentation Case: "Your friend is attending a local event—join them?"
You are evaluating a proposed notification: "Your friend is attending a local event—join them?" Define what “high quality” means for this notification system and design a rigorous plan to estimate impact, justify investment, and test pre/post launch.
Answer all parts:
-
Metrics and Definitions
-
Specify one North Star metric, three driver metrics, and three guardrail metrics with exact, unit-consistent formulas. Include:
-
Denominator definitions.
-
Attribution windows.
-
Whether each metric is a leading or lagging indicator.
-
Pre-build Adoption and Opportunity Sizing
-
Using historical event data, estimate adoption. The naive estimator averages, across past events, the percent of sign-ups who arrived with ≥1 friend.
-
List at least four biases (e.g., event-type confounding, seasonality, selection on observables, friendship-inference error).
-
Propose a corrected estimator (e.g., stratified weighting or matched cohorts).
-
Show how you would compute a 95% confidence interval (CI) for expected daily notification opens.
-
Investment Justification
-
Derive a break-even formula linking expected incremental opens, sessions, and retention to dev-weeks and infra cost.
-
State the minimum detectable effect (MDE) required to proceed.
-
Pre-launch Evidence Plan
-
Describe how to use concept tests/surveys and analog-notification benchmarks to predict CTR uplift, and how to adjust for response bias and population mismatch.
-
A/B Experiment Design
-
Define the unit of randomization, primary and guardrail metrics, sample sizing, and when cluster randomization (e.g., by event or geography) is required due to network effects.
-
Specify how to detect interference and what to do if contamination is observed.
-
Decision Framework
-
If an experiment shows time-on-site increases but CTR decreases, outline a metric hierarchy or utility function to make a go/no-go call, including constraints on unsubscribe/complaint rates and notification volume.