Detect and address Simpson’s paradox

Quick Overview

This question evaluates understanding of aggregation bias and Simpson's paradox, proficiency with stratified or mixed-model estimators, heterogeneity testing, and experiment decisioning within Analytics & Experimentation for a Data Scientist role.

Detect and address Simpson’s paradox

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Onsite

An experiment shows +1.2pp overall conversion uplift, yet the segment‑level effects are −0.5pp (New) and +2.0pp (Returning). a) Construct a concrete example showing how a shift in segment mix can create Simpson’s paradox. b) Pre‑register a stratified estimator (or MMRM) that protects against aggregation bias. c) Specify an interaction test for heterogeneity and a decision rule when heterogeneity is material (e.g., segment‑specific rollout vs. global ship).

Quick Answer: This question evaluates understanding of aggregation bias and Simpson's paradox, proficiency with stratified or mixed-model estimators, heterogeneity testing, and experiment decisioning within Analytics & Experimentation for a Data Scientist role.

|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Meta
Meta logo
Meta
Oct 13, 2025, 9:49 PM
mediumData ScientistOnsiteAnalytics & Experimentation
9
0

Experiment Aggregation Bias and Heterogeneity: Simpson's Paradox, Robust Estimation, and Decisioning

Context

You ran a randomized experiment measuring conversion rate uplift. The pooled (aggregate) analysis shows +1.2 percentage points (pp) uplift. When stratifying by user segment, the treatment effects are −0.5pp for New users and +2.0pp for Returning users.

Your goal:

  • Explain how differences in segment mix across arms can produce aggregation bias (often referred to as Simpson’s paradox in this context).
  • Pre-register an analysis plan that protects against this bias.
  • Specify how to test for treatment heterogeneity and how that translates to a rollout decision.

Tasks

(a) Construct a concrete numeric example where the overall uplift is +1.2pp even though the segment-level effects are −0.5pp (New) and +2.0pp (Returning), due to a shift in segment mix.

(b) Pre-register a stratified estimator (or MMRM alternative) to estimate a population-average effect that is robust to aggregation bias.

(c) Specify an interaction test for heterogeneity and a decision rule (segment-specific rollout vs. global ship) when heterogeneity is material.

Loading comments...