Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

This interview question evaluates metric design, causal reasoning, experiment setup, diagnostics, SQL/statistical checks, and recommendations in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: easy

Interview Round: Onsite

# Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook ## Product analytics case: Instagram vs Facebook Stories You work on **Stories** across two apps: **Instagram (IG)** and **Facebook (FB)**. A dashboard shows that **Stories are used by a much larger fraction of users on IG than on FB**, and this pattern has been stable over time. ### Your task Explain how you would **diagnose and quantify** why IG has higher Stories usage than FB, and what you would do next. ### Clarifications / assumptions (state and validate in interview) - Assume the metric shown is: **Story Usage Rate** = \( \frac{\text{# distinct active users who had ≥1 story view OR story creation event in a day}}{\text{# distinct daily active users (DAU)}} \). - Events are reliably logged, but instrumentation differences across apps are possible. - You can segment by user/app/version/country, and you can run experiments. ### What to cover 1. **Metric and data validation**: what could make the metric incomparable across apps? 2. **Decomposition**: break the gap into components (numerator vs denominator; view vs create; eligibility/supply/demand). 3. **Root-cause hypotheses** (product, audience, surface area, network effects, content supply). 4. **Analyses to run** to confirm/refute hypotheses (including segmentation and cohort analyses). 5. **Action plan**: what experiments or product changes you would test on FB Stories, and what success metrics + guardrails you’d use. ### Clarifying Questions to Ask - Clarify the business objective, unit of analysis, time window, exposure definition, and primary metric. - State assumptions about instrumentation, randomization, sample size, and data quality. - Separate descriptive analysis from causal claims. ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A metric framework with primary, guardrail, and diagnostic metrics. - A credible analysis or experiment design with clear assumptions and bias checks. - SQL/statistical logic for segmentation, variance, confidence, and data validation where relevant. - An actionable recommendation that explains trade-offs and next steps. ### Follow-up Questions - What sanity checks would you run before trusting the result? - How would you handle novelty effects, seasonality, or selection bias? - What decision would you make if metrics disagree?

Overview: This interview question evaluates metric design, causal reasoning, experiment setup, diagnostics, SQL/statistical checks, and recommendations in a realistic interview setting. A strong answer for Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook states assumptions, handles edge cases, explains trade-offs, and shows how to validate the result clearly.

Read the full Meta Data Scientist interview experience this question came from

|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Meta
Meta logo
Meta
Aug 5, 2025
easyData ScientistOnsiteAnalytics & Experimentation
7
0

Explain why IG Story usage exceeds Facebook

Product analytics case: Instagram vs Facebook Stories

You work on Stories across two apps: Instagram (IG) and Facebook (FB). A dashboard shows that Stories are used by a much larger fraction of users on IG than on FB, and this pattern has been stable over time.

Your task

Explain how you would diagnose and quantify why IG has higher Stories usage than FB, and what you would do next.

Clarifications / assumptions (state and validate in interview)

  • Assume the metric shown is: Story Usage Rate = \frac{\text{# distinct active users who had ≥1 story view OR story creation event in a day}}{\text{# distinct daily active users (DAU)}} .
  • Events are reliably logged, but instrumentation differences across apps are possible.
  • You can segment by user/app/version/country, and you can run experiments.

What to cover

  1. Metric and data validation : what could make the metric incomparable across apps?
  2. Decomposition : break the gap into components (numerator vs denominator; view vs create; eligibility/supply/demand).
  3. Root-cause hypotheses (product, audience, surface area, network effects, content supply).
  4. Analyses to run to confirm/refute hypotheses (including segmentation and cohort analyses).
  5. Action plan : what experiments or product changes you would test on FB Stories, and what success metrics + guardrails you’d use.

Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance

  • Clarify the business objective, unit of analysis, time window, exposure definition, and primary metric.
  • State assumptions about instrumentation, randomization, sample size, and data quality.
  • Separate descriptive analysis from causal claims.

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A metric framework with primary, guardrail, and diagnostic metrics.
  • A credible analysis or experiment design with clear assumptions and bias checks.
  • SQL/statistical logic for segmentation, variance, confidence, and data validation where relevant.
  • An actionable recommendation that explains trade-offs and next steps.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • What sanity checks would you run before trusting the result?
  • How would you handle novelty effects, seasonality, or selection bias?
  • What decision would you make if metrics disagree?
Loading comments...