Measure Harmful Content Impact with Key Metrics

Q: Measure Harmful Content Impact with Key Metrics

This question evaluates a data scientist's competency in measurement design, metric selection, and quantifying the business impact of harmful user-generated content within a policy severity taxonomy, emphasizing exposure, prevalence, and operational monitoring.

Q: How do I approach Analytics & Experimentation interview questions?

Analytics & Experimentation questions require understanding of core concepts and practice. PracHub provides solutions with explanations to help you master analytics & experimentation interviews.

Question

Measuring Harmful Content: Severity and Prevalence

Scenario

A social-media platform needs to quantify the business impact of harmful or inappropriate user-generated content.

Task

How would you measure the severity and prevalence of harmful content issues on the platform? Which specific metric(s)—for example, View Prevalence—would you choose, and why? Discuss advantages, limitations, and any complementary metrics you would track.

Clarifications and Assumptions

Harmful content is defined by a policy taxonomy with severity buckets (e.g., Severe A: safety/illegal; Medium B: hate/bullying; Low C: borderline/age-inappropriate).
Goal: capture user exposure and business risk, not just volume of takedowns.
Metrics should be actionable for ranking/enforcement and comparable over time.

Measure Harmful Content Impact with Key Metrics

Measuring Harmful Content: Severity and Prevalence

Scenario

Task

Clarifications and Assumptions

Solution

Comments (0)