Consider the following independent quantitative questions.
You play a game consisting of independent rounds. At the start your cumulative reward is 0. In each round, one of three things happens:
p1
, you
gain a fixed amount a dollars
, and the game continues to the next round.
p2
, the game
stops immediately
and you
keep your accumulated reward
.
1 - p1 - p2
, the game
ends immediately and your reward is reset to 0
(you lose everything earned so far).
Assume 0 < p1 + p2 < 1, p1 >= 0, p2 >= 0, and a > 0.
Question: Derive a closed-form expression for the expected payoff of this game at the time it eventually ends, in terms of p1, p2, and a.
Let x1, x2, ..., xn be a random permutation of n distinct numbers, where all n! permutations are equally likely.
Define a random variable Y as the length of the longest strictly increasing prefix of the sequence, using the following rule:
Y = k
if
x1 < x2 < ... < xk
, and
k = n
(the entire sequence is strictly increasing)
or
xk >= x(k+1)
(the first position where the prefix stops being strictly increasing is between positions
k
and
k+1
).
Question: Find E[Y] as a function of n.
A constant-dollar strategy in a market with one risky asset and cash is defined as:
W
invested in the risky asset.
W
; if it has gone down, you buy more shares to bring it back up to
W
. The remainder stays in cash.
Assume a volatile market where the risky asset price fluctuates up and down over time, but has approximately zero long-term drift in expectation.
Question: Explain, both intuitively and with a simple numerical or probabilistic argument, why and under what conditions such a constant-dollar rebalancing strategy can generate a positive expected profit ("volatility harvesting") even when the asset's long-run expected price change is roughly zero.
Let a, b, and c be random variables with correlations
corr(a, b) = rho_ab
,
corr(b, c) = rho_bc
,
where
-1 <= rho_ab <= 1
and
-1 <= rho_bc <= 1
.
rho_ac = corr(a, c)
. Use the fact that any
correlation matrix must be positive semidefinite (PSD)
to derive the
feasible range
of
rho_ac
in terms of
rho_ab
and
rho_bc
.
Consider an investment strategy whose one-year simple return (not log return) is a random variable R with:
E[R] = mu
.
std(R) = sigma
(so variance
Var(R) = sigma^2
).
Assume annual returns for different years are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) copies of R:
R1, R2, ..., RT
for
T
years.
Define:
R_total = R1 + R2 + ... + RT
(ignoring compounding, treating each year's return as additive P&L for simplicity).
T
years as
R_avg = R_total / T
.
Questions:
E[R_total]
and
Var(R_total)
in terms of
mu
,
sigma^2
, and
T
.
E[R_avg]
and
Var(R_avg)
in terms of
mu
,
sigma^2
, and
T
.
T
increases, assuming the i.i.d. model holds.
Login required