Connect next pointers for each tree level
Company: Meta
Role: Software Engineer
Category: Coding & Algorithms
Difficulty: hard
Interview Round: Technical Screen
Quick Answer: Evaluates understanding of binary tree traversal, in-place pointer manipulation, and time-space trade-offs by requiring population of sibling pointers across each level while meeting O(n) time and O(1) extra space constraints.
Constraints
- 0 <= len(values) <= 100000
- -10^9 <= values[i] <= 10^9 for every non-None value
- The tree uses heap-style array indexing with `None` placeholders for missing nodes
- The linking step should run in O(n) time
- Do not use a BFS queue; use O(1) auxiliary space for connecting pointers
Examples
Input: []
Expected Output: []
Explanation: An empty tree has no levels, so the serialized result is empty.
Input: [1]
Expected Output: [1, '#']
Explanation: There is only one node, and it has no neighbor on its level.
Input: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, None, 7]
Expected Output: [1, '#', 2, 3, '#', 4, 5, 7, '#']
Explanation: Level 1: 1. Level 2: 2 -> 3. Level 3: 4 -> 5 -> 7.
Input: [1, 2, 3, 4, None, None, 5]
Expected Output: [1, '#', 2, 3, '#', 4, 5, '#']
Explanation: The nodes 4 and 5 must be connected across different parents on the same level.
Input: [1, 2, 3, None, 4, 5, None, None, None, 6]
Expected Output: [1, '#', 2, 3, '#', 4, 5, '#', 6, '#']
Explanation: This sparse tree verifies that the algorithm correctly finds the next available child when nodes are missing.
Hints
- Once one level is connected, you can traverse that entire level using `next` pointers instead of a queue.
- While scanning the current level, build the next level's linked list using a dummy head and a moving tail pointer.