Design an Editable Text Buffer
Company: OpenAI
Role: Machine Learning Engineer
Category: Coding & Algorithms
Difficulty: medium
Interview Round: Technical Screen
Quick Answer: This question evaluates data structure design, mutable state management, undo/redo semantics, and prefix-based autocomplete indexing with dynamic frequency tracking.
Part 1: Basic Text Buffer
Constraints
- 0 <= len(operations) <= 5000
- 0 <= total number of inserted characters <= 100000
- Insert positions and delete ranges are always valid for the current text
- text may be an empty string
Examples
Input: [('insert', 0, 'hello'), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['hello']
Explanation: Insert into an empty buffer, then read the full text.
Input: [('insert', 0, 'heo'), ('insert', 2, 'l'), ('insert', 3, 'l'), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['hello']
Explanation: Two middle insertions build the word hello.
Input: [('insert', 0, 'abcdef'), ('delete', 2, 4), ('get',), ('insert', 2, 'CD'), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['abef', 'abCDef']
Explanation: Delete removes positions 2 and 3, then a new substring is inserted at that gap.
Input: [('insert', 0, 'x'), ('delete', 0, 1), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['']
Explanation: Deleting the only character leaves an empty buffer.
Input: []
Expected Output: []
Explanation: No operations means no output.
Hints
- Python strings are immutable, so repeatedly rebuilding a string can be costly.
- A mutable sequence such as a list of characters supports slice insertions and deletions cleanly.
Part 2: Text Buffer with Undo and Redo
Constraints
- 0 <= len(operations) <= 10000
- 0 <= total number of inserted characters <= 100000
- All insert positions and delete ranges are valid for the current text
- undo and redo on empty history should not raise errors
Examples
Input: [('insert', 0, 'hello'), ('undo',), ('get',), ('redo',), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['', 'hello']
Explanation: Undo removes the insertion, and redo re-applies it.
Input: [('insert', 0, 'abcdef'), ('delete', 2, 5), ('get',), ('undo',), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['abf', 'abcdef']
Explanation: Undo restores the deleted substring.
Input: [('insert', 0, 'abc'), ('undo',), ('insert', 0, 'z'), ('redo',), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['z']
Explanation: A new edit after undo clears the redo stack, so redo does nothing.
Input: [('undo',), ('redo',), ('get',)]
Expected Output: ['']
Explanation: Undo and redo are no-ops when there is no history.
Hints
- For each edit, store enough information to reverse it later.
- Two stacks usually model undo and redo cleanly.
Part 3: Dynamic Prefix Autocomplete
Constraints
- 0 <= len(operations) <= 10000
- Words contain only lowercase English letters
- 1 <= len(word) <= 20 for add/remove operations
- 0 <= k <= 20
- Removing a word with frequency 0 should do nothing
Examples
Input: [('add', 'apple'), ('add', 'app'), ('add', 'apple'), ('suggest', 'ap', 2)]
Expected Output: [['apple', 'app']]
Explanation: apple has frequency 2 and app has frequency 1.
Input: [('add', 'ball'), ('add', 'bat'), ('suggest', 'b', 2)]
Expected Output: [['ball', 'bat']]
Explanation: The frequencies are tied, so lexicographical order breaks the tie.
Input: [('add', 'apple'), ('add', 'apple'), ('add', 'app'), ('remove', 'apple'), ('suggest', 'ap', 2)]
Expected Output: [['app', 'apple']]
Explanation: After removal, both words have frequency 1, so app comes first lexicographically.
Input: [('remove', 'ghost'), ('add', 'dog'), ('add', 'deer'), ('add', 'dog'), ('suggest', '', 2), ('suggest', 'cat', 3)]
Expected Output: [['dog', 'deer'], []]
Explanation: Removing a missing word is ignored. Empty prefix means top words overall. Unknown prefixes return no suggestions.
Hints
- A trie helps you jump directly to the subtree for a prefix.
- To make results deterministic, sort matches by frequency descending and word ascending.