LLM Evaluation and Metrics for Product Use Cases
Asked of: Data Scientist
Last updated
-
What it is Evaluation and metrics for LLM-powered products is the discipline of measuring whether a model and the surrounding system achieve a user or business goal. It goes beyond academic benchmarks to include reliability, safety, latency, and cost in the actual workflow a product serves.
-
Why interviewers ask about it Data Scientists at consumer-scale companies care about shipping improvements that are measurable, safe, and cost-effective. They want to know you can turn open-ended generation into decision-ready metrics, design trustworthy offline tests, and validate with online experiments tied to product KPIs.
-
Core ideas to know
- Separate offline “golden set” evals from online A/B tests; use both to iterate and de-risk launches.
- Define task metrics: task success rate, exact match/F1 for structured outputs, groundedness/hallucination rate, and preference win rate versus a baseline.
- Include operational metrics: p95/p99 latency, cost per request/token, throughput, and reliability under load.
- Use human evaluation with clear rubrics and inter‑rater checks; calibrate any LLM‑as‑a‑judge against human panels.
- Build representative datasets: sample real traffic, synthesize templated variants, add adversarial and tail cases; prevent leakage from training data.
- Track safety and abuse: toxicity, PII leaks, jailbreak/prompt‑injection success rate, refusal accuracy, and content policy alignment.
- Continuously monitor post‑launch for quality drift and regressions; alert on metric thresholds and investigate with traces.
-
A common pitfall Candidates often optimize to public leaderboards and ignore whether the metric reflects the product’s actual job. They rely solely on LLM‑as‑a‑judge without validating agreement with humans, or they grade with the same model they’re testing, compounding bias. Another trap is evaluating the model in isolation while real failures come from retrieval, tools, or prompt orchestration. Strong answers tie eval design to a concrete KPI, use diverse, realistic test sets, and confirm offline gains with online win rates.
-
Further reading
- OpenAI — How evals drive the next chapter in AI for businesses. Practical framework for designing org‑specific evals that connect to workflows and KPIs. (openai.com)
- Judging LLM‑as‑a‑Judge with MT‑Bench and Chatbot Arena (NeurIPS 2023). Evidence and caveats on using models to grade models; helpful for preference/win‑rate design. (papers.nips.cc)
- Arize AI — LLM Evaluation eBook. Practitioner guide to offline/online evaluation, observability, and production monitoring patterns. (arize.com)