Balance Customer Satisfaction with Fraud Prevention: Key Metrics to Track
Company: TikTok
Role: Data Scientist
Category: Analytics & Experimentation
Difficulty: medium
Interview Round: Onsite
##### Scenario
Product and risk teams disagree about how aggressively to block suspicious transactions because it may hurt legitimate customers.
##### Question
How would you balance customer satisfaction with fraud prevention? Which metrics would you track to evaluate whether the balance is working over time?
##### Hints
Discuss precision-recall trade-off, false-positive rate, dispute rate, NPS, A/B tests, cost-benefit.
Quick Answer: Evaluates risk-decisioning trade-offs between customer experience and fraud prevention in payment products. Strong answers cover cost-sensitive thresholds, false declines, fraud loss, experimentation, monitoring, and delayed labels.
Balancing Customer Satisfaction and Fraud Prevention
In a consumer app with payments, Product wants minimal friction for legitimate users while Risk wants to reduce fraud losses. These goals can conflict when the system decides whether to allow, challenge, review, or block a transaction.
Explain how you would balance customer satisfaction with fraud prevention and which metrics you would track over time.
Constraints & Assumptions
Treat this as a risk decisioning problem with asymmetric costs.
Include both model-quality metrics and customer-experience metrics.
Account for delayed fraud labels, manual-review capacity, and segment-specific thresholds.
Do not optimize fraud loss in isolation if it creates excessive false declines.
Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance
What actions are available: allow, step-up verification, manual review, hold, or block?
What are the business costs of fraud loss, false declines, customer friction, and manual review?
How delayed and reliable are labels such as chargebacks or confirmed fraud?
Which user segments, transaction types, or payout flows are most sensitive?
Part 1 - Decision Strategy
Describe how you would decide when to allow, step up, manually review, or block.
What This Part Should Cover Guidance
Use calibrated fraud-risk scores and multiple thresholds rather than a single binary rule.