PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Uber

Determine Sample Size for Promotion Campaign A/B Test

Last updated: Jun 15, 2026

Quick Overview

An Uber Data Scientist technical-screen question on evaluating a promotion campaign with an A/B test. It probes business rationale, primary/secondary/guardrail metric selection, statistical power and sample-size estimation, interpreting a 0.5% minimum detectable effect, and explaining a small, non-significant +0.3% revenue lift to a product manager.

  • medium
  • Uber
  • Analytics & Experimentation
  • Data Scientist

Determine Sample Size for Promotion Campaign A/B Test

Company: Uber

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

##### Scenario Uber plans to launch a promotion campaign and wants to evaluate its effectiveness with an A/B experiment. Two concrete variants of the offer have come up in interviews: - A spend-threshold discount (e.g., **20% off when a user spends $40**), and - A geo-targeted promo limited to a single market (e.g., a **January-2024 campaign available only to San-Francisco users**). Treat the offer as a generic promotion; the reasoning below applies to either framing. ##### Question 1. **Business rationale.** Why might the company want to launch this promotion campaign? (If geo-limited, why restrict it to a single market like San Francisco?) 2. **Success metrics.** Which business metrics would you monitor to judge success? Distinguish primary, secondary/diagnostic, and guardrail metrics. 3. **Sample size.** How would you determine the required sample size for the study? What inputs, assumptions, and factors influence it? 4. **Interpreting the MDE.** Revenue is chosen as the primary metric and the product manager sets the minimum detectable effect (MDE) to **0.5%**. How do you interpret this value and how does it affect the sample-size calculation? 5. **Non-significant result.** Suppose the observed lift is **+0.3%** but the result is not statistically significant. How would you interpret this outcome and communicate it to the product manager? ##### Hints Think about goal alignment, primary/secondary/guardrail KPIs, baseline mean and variance, power and Type-I/Type-II errors, effect size, significance level, variance reduction (e.g., CUPED), and how to explain a small, directional-but-non-significant effect to a stakeholder.

Quick Answer: An Uber Data Scientist technical-screen question on evaluating a promotion campaign with an A/B test. It probes business rationale, primary/secondary/guardrail metric selection, statistical power and sample-size estimation, interpreting a 0.5% minimum detectable effect, and explaining a small, non-significant +0.3% revenue lift to a product manager.

Related Interview Questions

  • Design a Maps Address Search Bar - Uber
  • Evaluate a cold-start rating launch - Uber (medium)
  • Design Pricing Model Experiment - Uber (medium)
  • Evaluate marketplace interventions - Uber (medium)
  • Evaluate UberEATS priority delivery and membership - Uber (medium)
Uber logo
Uber
Aug 4, 2025, 10:55 AM
Data Scientist
Technical Screen
Analytics & Experimentation
70
0
Scenario

Uber plans to launch a promotion campaign and wants to evaluate its effectiveness with an A/B experiment. Two concrete variants of the offer have come up in interviews:

  • A spend-threshold discount (e.g., 20% off when a user spends $40 ), and
  • A geo-targeted promo limited to a single market (e.g., a January-2024 campaign available only to San-Francisco users ).

Treat the offer as a generic promotion; the reasoning below applies to either framing.

Question
  1. Business rationale. Why might the company want to launch this promotion campaign? (If geo-limited, why restrict it to a single market like San Francisco?)
  2. Success metrics. Which business metrics would you monitor to judge success? Distinguish primary, secondary/diagnostic, and guardrail metrics.
  3. Sample size. How would you determine the required sample size for the study? What inputs, assumptions, and factors influence it?
  4. Interpreting the MDE. Revenue is chosen as the primary metric and the product manager sets the minimum detectable effect (MDE) to 0.5% . How do you interpret this value and how does it affect the sample-size calculation?
  5. Non-significant result. Suppose the observed lift is +0.3% but the result is not statistically significant. How would you interpret this outcome and communicate it to the product manager?
Hints

Think about goal alignment, primary/secondary/guardrail KPIs, baseline mean and variance, power and Type-I/Type-II errors, effect size, significance level, variance reduction (e.g., CUPED), and how to explain a small, directional-but-non-significant effect to a stakeholder.

Solution

Show

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Analytics & Experimentation•More Uber•More Data Scientist•Uber Data Scientist•Uber Analytics & Experimentation•Data Scientist Analytics & Experimentation
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.