PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Attentive

Diagnose March Uber ride-volume drop

Last updated: Mar 29, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates a candidate's competency in diagnostic analytics, causal attribution, instrumentation validation, metric design, and experimentation for a rideshare marketplace, testing abilities in data slicing, time-series comparison, and comparative analysis.

  • hard
  • Attentive
  • Analytics & Experimentation
  • Data Scientist

Diagnose March Uber ride-volume drop

Company: Attentive

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Technical Screen

Uber observes a March ride-volume drop. After normalizing for days-in-month, completed trips are down 14% vs February and 9% vs the prior-year March. Design a diagnostic plan to (a) confirm the drop is real (not instrumentation/definition drift), (b) decompose it into demand-side vs supply-side drivers, and (c) quantify the top two root causes. Be specific: 1) Define the primary and guardrail metrics (e.g., request rate, conversion to accepted, pickup ETA, cancellation rate by initiator, completion rate, price indices, surge exposure, wait-time distribution, session-to-request funnel). 2) List the exact data points and cuts you’ll check first: by city/region, hour-of-day, weekday/weekend, rider/driver cohorts (tenure, loyalty), product type (UberX/Pool/Lux), price buckets, promo exposure, surge bins, weather, events/holidays (DST shift, spring break), airport vs non-airport, device/app version, major app releases. 3) Describe how you’d separate demand shrinkage from supply constraints (e.g., rides=requests×P(accept)×P(complete); use pickup ETA/cancellation elasticity, driver online minutes, active driver count, queue depth). 4) Specify statistical methods to establish “significant drop” and attribute causes (e.g., interrupted time series with seasonality/holiday controls, difference-in-differences across unaffected control cities, synthetic control). 5) Outline checks for measurement artifacts (schema changes, event loss, sampling, timezone/DST alignment, deduplication). 6) Propose 1–2 quick experiments or natural experiments to validate a suspected cause (e.g., restore prior promo budget in matched markets; temporarily cap ETA via supply incentives) including success metrics, MDE, and duration.

Quick Answer: This question evaluates a candidate's competency in diagnostic analytics, causal attribution, instrumentation validation, metric design, and experimentation for a rideshare marketplace, testing abilities in data slicing, time-series comparison, and comparative analysis.

Related Interview Questions

  • Investigate SMS delivery-rate drop at Attentive - Attentive (hard)
  • Interpret Results and Address Multiple Testing Concerns - Attentive (medium)
  • Apply Multiple Testing Corrections for Valid Results Analysis - Attentive (medium)
Attentive logo
Attentive
Oct 13, 2025, 9:49 PM
Data Scientist
Technical Screen
Analytics & Experimentation
3
0

Diagnostic Plan: March Ride-Volume Drop

Context

After normalizing for days-in-month, completed trips in March are down 14% vs February and down 9% vs prior-year March. Build a data-driven diagnostic plan to:

  • (a) Confirm the drop is real (not instrumentation/definition drift).
  • (b) Decompose it into demand-side vs supply-side drivers.
  • (c) Quantify the top two root causes.

Assume access to standard mobility marketplace logs (rider sessions/requests, driver online/acceptance, pricing/surge, cancellations, ETA, trips) and supporting data (weather, events, promotions, app versions).

Requirements

  1. Define primary and guardrail metrics (e.g., request rate, conversion to accepted, pickup ETA, cancellation rate by initiator, completion rate, price indices, surge exposure, wait-time distribution, session-to-request funnel).
  2. List the exact data points and cuts you will check first: by city/region, hour-of-day, weekday/weekend, rider/driver cohorts (tenure, loyalty), product type (UberX/Pool/Lux), price buckets, promo exposure, surge bins, weather, events/holidays (DST shift, spring break), airport vs non-airport, device/app version, major app releases.
  3. Describe how you would separate demand shrinkage from supply constraints (e.g., rides = requests × P(accept) × P(complete); use pickup ETA/cancellation elasticity, driver online minutes, active driver count, queue depth).
  4. Specify statistical methods to establish significant drop and attribute causes (e.g., interrupted time series with seasonality/holiday controls, difference-in-differences across unaffected control cities, synthetic control).
  5. Outline checks for measurement artifacts (schema changes, event loss, sampling, timezone/DST alignment, deduplication).
  6. Propose 1–2 quick experiments or natural experiments to validate a suspected cause (e.g., restore prior promo budget in matched markets; temporarily cap ETA via supply incentives), including success metrics, minimum detectable effect (MDE), and duration.

Solution

Show

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Analytics & Experimentation•More Attentive•More Data Scientist•Attentive Data Scientist•Attentive Analytics & Experimentation•Data Scientist Analytics & Experimentation
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.