Discuss Ethical Judgment and Unwanted Work
Company: Anthropic
Role: Software Engineer
Category: Behavioral & Leadership
Difficulty: medium
Interview Round: Onsite
You are interviewing for a **senior infrastructure software engineering** role. This is the **Culture / behavioral** round, and the interviewer is often *not* an engineer — so your answers must be clear, self-aware, and free of jargon. Two questions are asked, each with a built-in twist that tests how you reason under pressure rather than how polished a rehearsed story is.
### Constraints & Assumptions
- **Level**: Senior / staff infrastructure engineer. Expectations include self-awareness, ownership, sound judgment under pressure, and the ability to motivate peers without relying on authority.
- **Audience**: The interviewer may be a non-engineer (recruiter-adjacent or cross-functional). Answers should be intelligible without deep technical context.
- **Format**: These are improvised behavioral prompts with live follow-ups, not a single rehearsed STAR story. Expect the interviewer to push back or re-ask.
- **Honesty bar**: A non-answer ("I can't think of anything") reads as evasive or low self-awareness — the most common way candidates lose this round.
### Clarifying Questions to Ask
- Are you looking for examples from this role/team specifically, or is anything from my career fair game?
- For the persuasion part — should I assume the interviewer is a teammate I'd work with daily, or a peer on another team?
- Do you want the ethical example to be work-related, or is a broader life example acceptable?
- How much detail is useful — a quick situation, or the full arc including the resolution?
- For the "work I least enjoy" question, is it about the *type* of task, or about a phase of a project (e.g. early ambiguity vs. long-tail cleanup)?
### Part 1 — Work you least enjoy (and persuading a skeptic)
> What type of work do you *least* enjoy doing?
>
> After you answer, imagine the interviewer **also dislikes that exact same type of work**. Give a convincing reason why they should still do it when the team needs it.
```hint Where to start
This is really two tests stacked together: (1) self-awareness — can you name an honest dislike that doesn't read as a red flag (avoid making "documentation / on-call / debugging / collaboration" sound like core skills you resent)? and (2) influence-without-authority — can you motivate a peer who shares your aversion?
```
```hint The persuasion pivot
Don't argue "it's actually fun." The more durable move is to concede the dislike and then shift the frame toward *why it matters even to people who don't want to do it* — think about the costs of *not* doing it, shared goals, and who ends up holding the bag.
```
```hint Beyond "we must do it"
A senior signal is recognizing that motivation and ownership design matter. Think about what makes unpleasant-but-necessary work more bearable, more fairly distributed, or less necessary over time.
```
#### What This Part Should Cover
```premium-lock What This Part Should Cover
```
### Part 2 — Something you later considered ethically or morally wrong
> Tell me about a time when you did something that you *later* considered ethically or morally wrong. What happened, how did you handle it, and what did you learn?
```hint Choosing the story (this is the hardest part)
The trap is picking something so severe it disqualifies you, or so trivial ("I once took a long lunch") that it dodges the question. Aim for a genuine *judgment* lapse — an interpersonal or fairness misstep you owned and repaired — not fraud, harassment, discrimination, data/security misuse, or deliberate harm.
```
```hint Structure that shows accountability
Walk it as Situation → what you did wrong → who it affected → the concrete repair → the durable behavior change. The repair and the learning are what the interviewer scores; "what I'd do differently now" must be specific, not a platitude.
```
#### What This Part Should Cover
```premium-lock What This Part Should Cover
```
### What a Strong Answer Covers
```premium-lock What a Strong Answer Covers
```
### Follow-up Questions
- "Suppose you tried that persuasion and they still refused. What's your next move?"
- "You said you apologized — how did you know the repair actually rebuilt trust, rather than just making *you* feel better?"
- "Has the lesson from that ethical situation ever been tested again? Walk me through a time it came up after."
- "If the work you least enjoy is genuinely necessary and recurring, would you push to staff it differently, automate it away, or just absorb it — and why?"
Quick Answer: This behavioral interview question evaluates self-awareness, ethical judgment, and the ability to influence peers without relying on authority — core competencies for senior engineering roles. It tests whether candidates can honestly reflect on professional missteps, articulate their impact, and demonstrate lasting behavioral change under pressure from a non-technical interviewer.