PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Statistics & Math/Meta

Estimate CTR lift with binomial tests and errors

Last updated: Mar 29, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates statistical inference for proportions, sequential monitoring, and multiple-comparison error control—assessing competence with binomial-based CTR comparison, pooled standard errors, z-tests and confidence intervals, Type I error inflation from peeking, and FWER/FDR considerations.

  • hard
  • Meta
  • Statistics & Math
  • Data Scientist

Estimate CTR lift with binomial tests and errors

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Statistics & Math

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Onsite

In an A B test, control shows 10,000,000 impressions with 1.20% CTR; treatment shows 10,000,000 impressions with 1.23% CTR. (a) Compute the absolute and relative lift, the pooled standard error, z statistic, and two-sided p value. Provide a 95% confidence interval for the relative lift. (b) If you peeked daily over 14 days without alpha spending, quantify approximate Type I error inflation and propose a corrected sequential plan using alpha spending or a Bayesian alternative with a prior on lift. (c) If you also track 8 guardrail metrics, explain how you would control familywise error or false discovery rate.

Quick Answer: This question evaluates statistical inference for proportions, sequential monitoring, and multiple-comparison error control—assessing competence with binomial-based CTR comparison, pooled standard errors, z-tests and confidence intervals, Type I error inflation from peeking, and FWER/FDR considerations.

Related Interview Questions

  • Compute probability an account is fake - Meta (easy)
  • Compute Bayes probability for fake accounts - Meta (easy)
  • Compute probabilities for chatbot response quality - Meta (easy)
  • Compute posterior fake probability using Bayes' rule - Meta (medium)
  • Estimate bots and CI from DAU spike - Meta (medium)
Meta logo
Meta
Oct 13, 2025, 9:49 PM
Data Scientist
Onsite
Statistics & Math
4
0

A/B Test Inference, Peeking, and Multiple Comparisons

You run a two-arm A/B test of click-through rate (CTR).

  • Control: n_c = 10,000,000 impressions, CTR_c = 1.20%.
  • Treatment: n_t = 10,000,000 impressions, CTR_t = 1.23%.

Let p_c and p_t be the CTRs (as proportions).

(a) Compute:

  1. Absolute lift (p_t − p_c) and relative lift (p_t/p_c − 1).
  2. The pooled standard error for the difference in proportions, the z-statistic for H0: p_t = p_c, and the two-sided p-value.
  3. A 95% confidence interval for the relative lift.

(b) Suppose you peeked at significance daily over 14 days using the same test threshold each day (no alpha spending). Quantify the approximate inflation of the overall Type I error, and then propose a corrected sequential monitoring plan using either:

  • An alpha-spending/group-sequential design, or
  • A Bayesian sequential alternative with a prior on lift.

(c) You also track 8 guardrail metrics. Explain how you would control familywise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR) across these guardrails (and how this interacts with sequential monitoring).

Solution

Show

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Statistics & Math•More Meta•More Data Scientist•Meta Data Scientist•Meta Statistics & Math•Data Scientist Statistics & Math
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,500+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.