PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Statistics & Math/Meta

Estimate delayed CVR nonparametrically with censored data

Last updated: Mar 29, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates competence in handling right-censored time-to-event data, nonparametric estimation and inference for delayed conversions, construction of confidence intervals and distribution-free bounds, diagnostic checks for nonstationarity, and reasoning about identifiability under aggregated data.

  • Medium
  • Meta
  • Statistics & Math
  • Data Scientist

Estimate delayed CVR nonparametrically with censored data

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Statistics & Math

Difficulty: Medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

Today is 2025-09-01. We need the 14-day conversion rate (CVR14) for impressions served between 2025-08-18 and 2025-09-01, but many conversions occur with unknown delays up to 14 days, so recent impressions are right-censored. You cannot assume any parametric delay distribution. Tasks: 1) Propose a nonparametric estimator for CVR14 that uses historical cohorts to learn the time-to-convert survival function and applies it to the current, partially observed cohort (e.g., Kaplan–Meier for conversion delay with right-censoring, then inverse-probability weighting to debias the observed-to-date converts). Write formulas for the estimator and indicate the data each term uses. 2) Construct a 95% confidence interval using Greenwood’s formula for the KM variance and the delta method for the transformed CVR, stating assumptions. Explain how you would widen intervals if you suspect non-stationarity of delays. 3) Provide a distribution-free conservative bound for CVR14 that makes minimal assumptions (e.g., DKW inequality on the empirical CDF of delays or Clopper–Pearson on observed conversions plus a worst-case bound for yet-unfinished impressions). Show how to compute it from raw counts available today. 4) Describe diagnostics to check whether the historical delay distribution is applicable now (e.g., compare covariate-shift via PSI/KS tests on traffic mix, day-of-week effects, or device splits) and how to stratify/weight if shift is detected. 5) If you can observe only aggregated daily counts of impressions and same-day conversions (no user-level data), outline an identifiable approach and the additional assumptions required to estimate or bound CVR14.

Quick Answer: This question evaluates competence in handling right-censored time-to-event data, nonparametric estimation and inference for delayed conversions, construction of confidence intervals and distribution-free bounds, diagnostic checks for nonstationarity, and reasoning about identifiability under aggregated data.

Related Interview Questions

  • Compute probability an account is fake - Meta (easy)
  • Compute Bayes probability for fake accounts - Meta (easy)
  • Compute probabilities for chatbot response quality - Meta (easy)
  • Compute posterior fake probability using Bayes' rule - Meta (medium)
  • Estimate bots and CI from DAU spike - Meta (medium)
Meta logo
Meta
Oct 13, 2025, 9:49 PM
Data Scientist
Technical Screen
Statistics & Math
6
0

Today is 2025-09-01. We need the 14-day conversion rate (CVR14) for impressions served between 2025-08-18 and 2025-09-01, but many conversions occur with unknown delays up to 14 days, so recent impressions are right-censored. You cannot assume any parametric delay distribution. Tasks:

  1. Propose a nonparametric estimator for CVR14 that uses historical cohorts to learn the time-to-convert survival function and applies it to the current, partially observed cohort (e.g., Kaplan–Meier for conversion delay with right-censoring, then inverse-probability weighting to debias the observed-to-date converts). Write formulas for the estimator and indicate the data each term uses.
  2. Construct a 95% confidence interval using Greenwood’s formula for the KM variance and the delta method for the transformed CVR, stating assumptions. Explain how you would widen intervals if you suspect non-stationarity of delays.
  3. Provide a distribution-free conservative bound for CVR14 that makes minimal assumptions (e.g., DKW inequality on the empirical CDF of delays or Clopper–Pearson on observed conversions plus a worst-case bound for yet-unfinished impressions). Show how to compute it from raw counts available today.
  4. Describe diagnostics to check whether the historical delay distribution is applicable now (e.g., compare covariate-shift via PSI/KS tests on traffic mix, day-of-week effects, or device splits) and how to stratify/weight if shift is detected.
  5. If you can observe only aggregated daily counts of impressions and same-day conversions (no user-level data), outline an identifiable approach and the additional assumptions required to estimate or bound CVR14.

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Statistics & Math•More Meta•More Data Scientist•Meta Data Scientist•Meta Statistics & Math•Data Scientist Statistics & Math
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.