Evaluate and monitor a credit risk model
Company: Capital One
Role: Data Scientist
Category: Machine Learning
Difficulty: hard
Interview Round: Technical Screen
You are shipping a credit-risk model (probability of default within 12 months) for a consumer lender with a 1% default rate. Misclassification costs: a false negative (approve a defaulter) costs $1,200; a false positive (decline a good applicant) costs $60. The regulator expects stability and explainability over pure accuracy. Pick the three most important evaluation priorities for this context and justify them. Then design an end-to-end plan covering: (1) offline evaluation (temporal cross-validation, class imbalance handling, choice of metrics such as AUC-PR, expected cost, calibration error, KS, and reason for each); (2) threshold selection to minimize expected cost subject to max 4% decline rate; (3) backtesting on out-of-time cohorts and stress periods; (4) a champion–challenger live test with guardrails; (5) production monitoring (data/label drift, calibration monitoring, PSI thresholds, stability by segment, and an alert/runbook). Be specific about calculations, acceptance criteria, and what you would do if calibration drifts while rank ordering remains stable.
Overview: This question evaluates competency in designing, evaluating, and monitoring cost-sensitive consumer credit probability-of-default (PD) models, emphasizing calibration, rank ordering, threshold selection, backtesting, champion–challenger experimentation, and production monitoring under regulatory stability and explainability constraints.
Read the full Capital One Data Scientist interview experience this question came from