Top Dasher Program: Decision Framework, Experiment with Interference, Anti-Gaming, and Ethics
Context
You are a data scientist at a food delivery marketplace. Product proposes a "Top Dasher" program that grants the top 10% of drivers priority dispatch and flexible scheduling if they maintain an acceptance rate ≥ 70% and a completion rate ≥ 95% over the last 30 days.
Assume: the program is an overlay on the existing dispatch algorithm (priority bump in ranking), and flexible scheduling means earlier access to shift slots in constrained markets.
Tasks
-
Decision framework
-
Should we launch? Build a framework that quantifies expected value and risks.
-
Identify primary success metrics (e.g., order ETAs, fulfillment rate, cancellations, driver earnings dispersion, merchant and consumer NPS) and guardrails.
-
Define an explicit go/no-go decision rule.
-
Experiment design with marketplace interference
-
Design an experiment to estimate causal impact given that priority reallocates orders among drivers (violating standard SUTVA).
-
Specify unit of randomization (driver, zone, market-day), clustering, sample size and duration.
-
Explain how to mitigate SUTVA violations and spillovers.
-
Gaming and selection bias
-
How will you prevent gaming (e.g., acceptance-rate manipulation) and selection bias?
-
Propose instrumentation and a pre-registered analysis plan, including CUPED or pre-period covariate adjustment.
-
Heterogeneity
-
Outline heterogeneity analyses (new vs. veteran drivers, peak vs. off-peak, high vs. low supply markets) and how their results would change the rollout plan.
-
Ethics and operations
-
Discuss ethical and operational tradeoffs (fairness across drivers, small-market impacts, earnings volatility).
-
Propose guardrail thresholds and a rollback plan.