PracHub
QuestionsPremiumLearningGuidesCheatsheetNEWCoaches
|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/LinkedIn

Evaluate 'Job You May Be Interested In' Recommender

Last updated: Mar 29, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates skills in experimentation design, online and offline metrics for recommender systems, causal inference for A/B testing, and diagnostic analysis in a two-sided marketplace.

  • hard
  • LinkedIn
  • Analytics & Experimentation
  • Data Scientist

Evaluate 'Job You May Be Interested In' Recommender

Company: LinkedIn

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Onsite

Scenario: LinkedIn is rolling out an upgraded job recommendation algorithm. Question 1: Which key offline and online metrics would you track to judge success? Question 2: How would you design an A/B test to compare the new model against the current one while mitigating network effects? Question 3: How would you determine required sample size, exposure, and test duration? Question 4: If performance differs across user segments, how would you diagnose root causes and iterate?

Quick Answer: This question evaluates skills in experimentation design, online and offline metrics for recommender systems, causal inference for A/B testing, and diagnostic analysis in a two-sided marketplace.

Related Interview Questions

  • Test whether US uploads more videos - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Resolve Simpson’s paradox in email A/B test - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Choose single queue vs multiple queues - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Resolve Simpson’s paradox in A/B email test - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Do US members upload more videos than non-US? - LinkedIn (easy)
LinkedIn logo
LinkedIn
Jul 12, 2025, 6:59 PM
Data Scientist
Onsite
Analytics & Experimentation
17
0

LinkedIn Jobs Recommender Upgrade — Metrics, Experiment Design, Powering, and Diagnostics

Context

LinkedIn is upgrading the algorithm that recommends jobs to members across surfaces such as the Jobs tab, homepage modules, and notifications. This is a two‑sided marketplace: member outcomes (finding relevant jobs, applying) must improve without harming employer outcomes (quality and distribution of applications). Assume we can log impressions, positions, clicks, saves, apply starts/completions, response/latency, and eligibility sets per request.

Questions

  1. Which key offline and online metrics would you track to judge success?
  2. How would you design an A/B test to compare the new model against the current one while mitigating network effects?
  3. How would you determine required sample size, exposure, and test duration?
  4. If performance differs across user segments, how would you diagnose root causes and iterate?

Solution

Show

Comments (0)

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Analytics & Experimentation•More LinkedIn•More Data Scientist•LinkedIn Data Scientist•LinkedIn Analytics & Experimentation•Data Scientist Analytics & Experimentation
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 7,500+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.