PracHub
QuestionsCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/System Design/Anthropic

Find a Distributed Mode Efficiently

Last updated: Jul 14, 2026

Quick Overview

Design an exact distributed algorithm for finding the mode of a multiset partitioned across workers without shipping every raw item. Quantify communication, address skew and reducer hotspots, define deterministic tie-breaking and retries, and compare honest approximate alternatives.

  • hard
  • Anthropic
  • System Design
  • Software Engineer

Find a Distributed Mode Efficiently

Company: Anthropic

Role: Software Engineer

Category: System Design

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Onsite

# Find a Distributed Mode Efficiently A large multiset is partitioned across ten workers. Find the value with the highest total frequency across all workers. Network bandwidth is the bottleneck, so sending every raw item to one coordinator is unacceptable. Design an exact solution and, if useful, an approximate alternative. Specify worker, network, reducer, and coordinator responsibilities; tie-breaking; failure behavior; and the amount of data transferred in terms of local distinct values and global cardinality. ### Constraints & Assumptions - A value may appear on many workers and local partitions can be highly skewed. - The exact mode is required unless the caller explicitly chooses an approximate result. - Use a deterministic tie-breaker such as the smallest serialized value. - Workers can aggregate locally before communicating. - The coordinator should not become the only place that stores every raw record. ### Clarifying Questions to Ask - What is the value domain and approximate distinct cardinality? - Is the result one-time or continuously updated? - Are worker partitions replayable after failure? - Is an error probability or additive frequency error acceptable? - Can workers communicate with one another, or only with a service tier? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A correct global aggregation plan with quantified communication. - Partitioning and skew mitigation. - An explicit exact-versus-approximate contract. - Retry, deduplication, tie-breaking, and observability. ### Follow-up Questions 1. How would the design change for a sliding window? 2. How would you find the top one thousand values rather than one mode? 3. What happens when one value dominates a reducer partition? 4. Can you prove when a two-round candidate-pruning scheme is exact?

Quick Answer: Design an exact distributed algorithm for finding the mode of a multiset partitioned across workers without shipping every raw item. Quantify communication, address skew and reducer hotspots, define deterministic tie-breaking and retries, and compare honest approximate alternatives.

Related Interview Questions

  • Design a Dynamically Batched Inference API - Anthropic (hard)
  • Design a Concurrent Image Processing Service - Anthropic (hard)
  • Design a Prompt Playground - Anthropic (hard)
  • Deploy a Large Model to GPU Workers - Anthropic (hard)
  • Design a Distributed Rate Limiter - Anthropic (medium)
|Home/System Design/Anthropic

Find a Distributed Mode Efficiently

Anthropic logo
Anthropic
Jul 8, 2026, 12:00 AM
hardSoftware EngineerOnsiteSystem Design
2
0

Find a Distributed Mode Efficiently

A large multiset is partitioned across ten workers. Find the value with the highest total frequency across all workers. Network bandwidth is the bottleneck, so sending every raw item to one coordinator is unacceptable.

Design an exact solution and, if useful, an approximate alternative. Specify worker, network, reducer, and coordinator responsibilities; tie-breaking; failure behavior; and the amount of data transferred in terms of local distinct values and global cardinality.

Constraints & Assumptions

  • A value may appear on many workers and local partitions can be highly skewed.
  • The exact mode is required unless the caller explicitly chooses an approximate result.
  • Use a deterministic tie-breaker such as the smallest serialized value.
  • Workers can aggregate locally before communicating.
  • The coordinator should not become the only place that stores every raw record.

Clarifying Questions to Ask

  • What is the value domain and approximate distinct cardinality?
  • Is the result one-time or continuously updated?
  • Are worker partitions replayable after failure?
  • Is an error probability or additive frequency error acceptable?
  • Can workers communicate with one another, or only with a service tier?

What a Strong Answer Covers

  • A correct global aggregation plan with quantified communication.
  • Partitioning and skew mitigation.
  • An explicit exact-versus-approximate contract.
  • Retry, deduplication, tie-breaking, and observability.

Follow-up Questions

  1. How would the design change for a sliding window?
  2. How would you find the top one thousand values rather than one mode?
  3. What happens when one value dominates a reducer partition?
  4. Can you prove when a two-round candidate-pruning scheme is exact?

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More System Design•More Anthropic•More Software Engineer•Anthropic Software Engineer•Anthropic System Design•Software Engineer System Design

Your design canvas — auto-saved

PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,500+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • AI Coding Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.