Handle two teams duplicating work
Company: Google
Role: Software Engineer
Category: Behavioral & Leadership
Difficulty: hard
Interview Round: Technical Screen
If you discover that two different teams are independently working on the same project or solving the same problem, how would you handle the situation?
Quick Answer: This question evaluates leadership competencies such as cross-team communication, stakeholder alignment, prioritization, and conflict-resolution skills.
Solution
A strong answer should show collaboration, ownership, and good judgment.
## Good structure for the answer
### 1. Verify the situation first
I would first confirm whether the work is truly duplicated or whether the two teams are solving related but different parts of the problem. I would gather facts about:
- goals and scope
- timelines
- stakeholders
- dependencies
- why each team started the work
### 2. Talk to the relevant people early
I would speak with the leads or managers of both teams to understand the context, not to assign blame. My goal would be to surface overlap quickly and prevent wasted effort.
### 3. Align on the best path forward
Once I understand the overlap, I would help drive a decision such as:
- consolidate the work under one team
- split responsibilities clearly if both teams should stay involved
- merge the best parts of both approaches
I would focus on what is best for the company: minimizing duplicated effort, reducing confusion, and keeping delivery on track.
### 4. Document ownership and next steps
After alignment, I would make sure there is a clear written decision:
- who owns what
- what the timeline is
- how handoff or collaboration will work
- what stakeholders need to know
This prevents the same confusion from happening again.
### 5. Escalate only if needed
If the teams cannot align or there is significant organizational risk, I would escalate to the appropriate manager or leadership with a clear summary of options and trade-offs, rather than just reporting a problem.
### 6. Prevent recurrence
I would also look for process improvements, such as:
- better roadmap sharing
- clearer ownership definitions
- design reviews across teams
- regular cross-team planning meetings
## Example concise answer
"First, I would verify whether the two teams are actually duplicating work or just working on adjacent pieces. Then I would talk with both teams' leads to understand scope, timeline, and goals. If there is real overlap, I would help align everyone on a single plan—either consolidating the work, dividing ownership clearly, or merging the strongest parts of each approach. I would document the decision and communicate it to stakeholders so there is no ambiguity. If needed, I would escalate with recommended options, not just the problem. Finally, I would suggest a process change so the overlap does not happen again."