Investigate Why DAU Stagnates Despite High Downloads
Investigating High Daily Downloads but Flat DAU
Scenario
Adobe Express reports approximately 1M daily downloads, yet daily active users (DAU) remain flat.
Assume:
-
Daily downloads = app store installs on iOS/Android (unique devices), inclusive of organic and paid.
-
DAU = unique users who generate a qualifying in-app event per calendar day (e.g., app open or key activity), de-duplicated by user/account where available.
Task
Daily downloads are high but DAU is not growing. Outline a rigorous plan to investigate and resolve this discrepancy.
Your answer should cover:
-
Data cuts and instrumentation checks you would run.
-
Analyses (time series, funnels, cohorts) to diagnose where the gap occurs.
-
Key hypotheses that could explain the pattern and how you would test them.
-
Experiments or causal methods to validate fixes and measure impact.
Hints to Consider
-
Funnel drop-offs: install → first open → permissions → sign-up/login → activation event → repeat use.
-
Activation and retention cohorts (D0/D1/D7/D28).
-
Organic vs. paid installs; incrementality of paid channels.
-
Device/platform/app version issues (crashes/ANR, app size, OS compatibility).
-
User feedback (reviews, CS tickets, surveys) and store listing performance.
-
Reinstalls, duplicate devices, cross-platform cannibalization (mobile vs. web).
Constraints & Assumptions
-
Preserve the scope, facts, inputs, and requested outputs from the prompt above.
-
If the prompt leaves a detail unspecified, state a reasonable assumption before relying on it.
-
Keep the answer interview-ready: concise enough to present, but concrete enough to implement or evaluate.
Clarifying Questions to Ask
-
Clarify the business objective, unit of analysis, time window, exposure definition, and primary metric.
-
State assumptions about instrumentation, randomization, sample size, and data quality.
-
Separate descriptive analysis from causal claims.
What a Strong Answer Covers
-
A metric framework with primary, guardrail, and diagnostic metrics.
-
A credible analysis or experiment design with clear assumptions and bias checks.
-
SQL/statistical logic for segmentation, variance, confidence, and data validation where relevant.
-
An actionable recommendation that explains trade-offs and next steps.
Follow-up Questions
-
What sanity checks would you run before trusting the result?
-
How would you handle novelty effects, seasonality, or selection bias?
-
What decision would you make if metrics disagree?