PracHub
QuestionsPremiumCoachesLearningGuidesInterview Prep
|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/LinkedIn

Measure Relevant Feed Success

Last updated: Apr 2, 2026

Quick Overview

This question evaluates a data scientist's competency in product analytics and experimentation, specifically metric definition, A/B test design, interpreting engagement versus high-quality engagement, and balancing viewer-side and poster-side marketplace effects like reach, incentives, and fairness.

  • hard
  • LinkedIn
  • Analytics & Experimentation
  • Data Scientist

Measure Relevant Feed Success

Company: LinkedIn

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: hard

Interview Round: Technical Screen

LinkedIn changes the Home Feed default experience from showing all content to showing only content predicted to be relevant to each viewer. How would you evaluate whether this change is successful? Your answer should cover both sides of the marketplace: - **Viewer side:** engagement, satisfaction, content discovery, and retention. - **Poster side:** reach, quality of engagement, incentives to keep posting, and fairness of distribution. Please describe: - The primary success metrics and guardrail metrics you would choose. - How you would design an A/B test for this change. - How you would define and measure "high-quality engagement" rather than raw engagement alone. - What risks this change may create, such as filter bubbles, lower creator reach, reduced diversity, or concentration of attention on a small set of posters. - How you would decide whether the launch is beneficial in the short term and sustainable in the long term. Also answer this follow-up: if viewers show higher click and like rates under the new relevant-only feed, but posters worry that their content reaches fewer people, how would you analyze and respond to that concern?

Quick Answer: This question evaluates a data scientist's competency in product analytics and experimentation, specifically metric definition, A/B test design, interpreting engagement versus high-quality engagement, and balancing viewer-side and poster-side marketplace effects like reach, incentives, and fairness.

Related Interview Questions

  • Test whether US uploads more videos - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Resolve Simpson’s paradox in email A/B test - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Choose single queue vs multiple queues - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Resolve Simpson’s paradox in A/B email test - LinkedIn (easy)
  • Do US members upload more videos than non-US? - LinkedIn (easy)
LinkedIn logo
LinkedIn
Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM
Data Scientist
Technical Screen
Analytics & Experimentation
2
0
Loading...

LinkedIn changes the Home Feed default experience from showing all content to showing only content predicted to be relevant to each viewer.

How would you evaluate whether this change is successful?

Your answer should cover both sides of the marketplace:

  • Viewer side: engagement, satisfaction, content discovery, and retention.
  • Poster side: reach, quality of engagement, incentives to keep posting, and fairness of distribution.

Please describe:

  • The primary success metrics and guardrail metrics you would choose.
  • How you would design an A/B test for this change.
  • How you would define and measure "high-quality engagement" rather than raw engagement alone.
  • What risks this change may create, such as filter bubbles, lower creator reach, reduced diversity, or concentration of attention on a small set of posters.
  • How you would decide whether the launch is beneficial in the short term and sustainable in the long term.

Also answer this follow-up: if viewers show higher click and like rates under the new relevant-only feed, but posters worry that their content reaches fewer people, how would you analyze and respond to that concern?

Solution

Show

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...

Browse More Questions

More Analytics & Experimentation•More LinkedIn•More Data Scientist•LinkedIn Data Scientist•LinkedIn Analytics & Experimentation•Data Scientist Analytics & Experimentation
PracHub

Master your tech interviews with 8,000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

  • Questions
  • Learning Tracks
  • Interview Guides
  • Resources
  • Premium
  • For Universities
  • Student Access

Browse

  • By Company
  • By Role
  • By Category
  • Topic Hubs
  • SQL Questions
  • Compare Platforms
  • Discord Community

Support

  • support@prachub.com
  • (916) 541-4762

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.