##### Question
Please introduce yourself.
Why do you want to join Amazon?
Tell me about a time you were criticised and how you responded.
Describe a situation where you had to quickly learn something new and apply it.
Tell me about a time you missed a deadline and what you learned.
Quick Answer: This set of behavioral prompts evaluates competencies such as handling criticism, learning agility, accountability for missed deadlines, communication, and leadership within a software engineering context.
Solution
# How to Approach Behavioral Questions (for a SWE Phone Screen)
- Use STAR(L): Situation, Task, Action, Result, Learning.
- Choose recent, high-impact examples (ideally from the last 1–2 years) with clear metrics (latency, reliability, cost, adoption).
- Timebox: 60–90 seconds for the intro; 2–3 minutes per story.
- Emphasize relevant leadership traits: Customer Obsession, Ownership, Bias for Action, Learn and Be Curious, Deliver Results, Earn Trust, Dive Deep.
---
## 1) Introduce Yourself
Structure (Present → Past → Future):
- Present: Role, core stack, domain, scale.
- Past: 1–2 achievements with metrics.
- Future: What you want next and why it aligns with Amazon.
Example (adapt as needed):
- Present: "I’m a software engineer with 4 years’ experience building distributed backend services in Java and Python on AWS. I focus on low-latency APIs and data-intensive microservices."
- Past achievements: "Recently, I led a cache redesign using Redis and asynchronous I/O that reduced P95 latency by 38% and cut compute cost by 22%. Before that, I productionized a feature-flagged rollout that handled 15k RPS with zero downtime."
- Future: "I’m excited to work on large-scale services where I can dive deep into performance and reliability, learn from bar-raising peers, and contribute to customer-facing impact."
Checklist:
- Keep it to ~60–90 seconds.
- Use 1–2 metrics; avoid jargon unless it supports impact.
- Convey ownership and scale.
---
## 2) Why Do You Want to Join Amazon?
Structure (3 concrete reasons):
1) Customer/problem focus: Specific products/scale that motivate you.
2) Role fit: Your skills match the team’s challenges (e.g., distributed systems, reliability, ML platforms).
3) Growth/culture: Leadership Principles that resonate (e.g., Customer Obsession, Dive Deep).
Example:
"Three reasons: First, the scale and customer impact—building services that handle millions of requests per second is uniquely motivating. Second, the engineering challenges match my strengths in low-latency, fault-tolerant systems on AWS; I’ve delivered double-digit latency improvements and cost reductions that I’d like to replicate at greater scale. Third, the leadership culture—especially Customer Obsession and Dive Deep—aligns with how I work: I instrument everything, read the logs, and trace issues to root cause. I’m looking for an environment that rewards ownership and learning."
Pitfalls to avoid:
- Generic praise without specifics.
- Talking primarily about compensation or prestige.
- Vague statements with no link to your track record.
---
## 3) Tell Me About a Time You Were Criticized and How You Responded
What to demonstrate: Earn Trust, Ownership, Learn and Be Curious. Show openness, action, and measurable improvement.
Framework:
- Situation/Task: Context and the feedback you received.
- Action: How you processed it (asked clarifying questions, sought examples), what you changed, and how you verified improvement.
- Result: Quantified outcome.
- Learning: What you institutionalized.
Example:
- Situation: "During a code review for a new messaging service, a senior engineer criticized my test strategy as too narrow—unit tests only, limited integration coverage."
- Action: "I set up a 30-minute session to understand failure modes they’d seen. I added contract tests with Pact, property-based tests for edge cases, and a test container to simulate Kafka. I also wrote a short design doc to align on test scope."
- Result: "Escaped defects in staging dropped by 60%, and we caught a serialization bug pre-release that would have caused message loss. CI time increased by 8% but saved multiple on-call pages."
- Learning: "Now I start designs with a risks-and-tests section and request early feedback. I also contributed a testing template to our team wiki."
Tips:
- Own it; avoid defensiveness.
- Show the mechanism you changed, not just the immediate fix.
---
## 4) Describe a Situation Where You Had to Quickly Learn Something New and Apply It
What to demonstrate: Learn and Be Curious, Bias for Action, Deliver Results.
Framework:
- Situation/Task: Urgency and why the new skill/tool was required.
- Action: Concrete learning steps (docs, POCs, pairing) and how you de-risked.
- Result: Measurable impact.
- Learning: Reusable playbook or artifacts.
Example:
- Situation: "We needed blue/green deployments, but our stack lacked a robust solution; we chose Kubernetes with Helm, which I hadn’t used."
- Action: "I took a targeted approach: completed the official Helm tutorial, spun up a kind cluster locally, and paired with our SRE on manifests. I built a minimal service with liveness/readiness probes and automated canaries with a 5% traffic ramp."
- Result: "Deployment time dropped from 90 to 25 minutes; on-call pages during releases fell by 50% over 2 months. I documented a runbook and created a Helm chart template used by 3 other services."
- Learning: "When learning under time pressure, start with a lab environment, define a rollback plan, and instrument early."
---
## 5) Tell Me About a Time You Missed a Deadline and What You Learned
What to demonstrate: Ownership, Dive Deep, Deliver Results, Earn Trust. Avoid blame; show proactive recovery and prevention.
Framework:
- Situation/Task: State the deadline and why it mattered.
- Action: How you communicated, triaged scope, recovered, and prevented recurrence.
- Result: Outcome with data.
- Learning: Process/estimation improvements.
Example:
- Situation: "I owned an ETL migration off a legacy warehouse with a quarter-end reporting deadline. I underestimated backfill complexity and we slipped by 5 business days."
- Action: "I notified stakeholders early, proposed a phased plan (critical reports first, long-tail later), added feature flags, and set hourly status updates. Post-release, I ran a postmortem, added dependency mapping to our planning template, and adopted story point estimation with historical velocity."
- Result: "Critical reports shipped with 99.9% availability; downstream bugs decreased by 40% week-over-week due to improved validation checks."
- Learning: "I now include risk buffers for data migrations, define clear exit criteria, and schedule dry runs with success metrics."
Pitfalls:
- Blaming others or leaving out your role.
- No concrete mitigation or prevention steps.
---
## Final Preparation Checklist
- Prepare 6–8 STAR stories mapped to common themes: ownership, conflict/feedback, ambiguity, failure/recovery, learning, delivering under constraints.
- Bake in metrics: latency (P95/P99), error rates, cost, throughput, uptime, deployment frequency.
- Practice aloud; target 2–3 minutes per story. Have a 10–15 second "headline" for each.
- Use "I" to highlight your contributions; credit others where appropriate.
- Bring mechanisms: design docs, runbooks, tests, dashboards—show how you make improvements stick.