Accessible Ride-Hailing Product Design for Riders with Disabilities

Quick Overview

A product design question that asks how to build a car-sharing service, modeled on Uber, for people with disabilities. It tests choosing which riders to serve first, mapping pain points across the whole trip, prioritizing rider-side and vehicle-supply solutions, and defining success metrics with guardrails.

Accessible Ride-Hailing Product Design for Riders with Disabilities

Company: Uber

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

Design a car-sharing platform, modeled on Uber, for people with disabilities. Explain which riders you would design for first, what goes wrong for them when they try to get a ride today, which product changes you would build and in what order, and how you would know the service is succeeding. ```hint Follow one trip end to end Different disabilities break different steps of a ride. Once you have picked whom to serve, walk their trip from booking to reaching the building entrance and mark the step where it fails most often. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Which disabilities are in scope: mobility impairments, blindness or low vision, deafness or hard of hearing, cognitive disabilities, or all of them? - Is this a new standalone service, or an accessibility offering inside Uber's existing app and driver network? - Does "car sharing" here mean rides with a driver, as on Uber, or access to vehicles the rider drives themselves? - Which market is this for, given that accessibility law and the supply of wheelchair-accessible vehicles differ from country to country? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A scoped choice of which riders and disabilities to serve first, with the reason - Pain points across the whole trip: booking, waiting, boarding, riding, drop-off and the final stretch to the door - Solutions on both the rider side and the vehicle-and-driver side, prioritized with explicit criteria - How the service stays reliable and financially sustainable when suitable vehicles and trained drivers are scarce - A primary metric with guardrails, and the risks specific to this rider population ### Follow-up Questions - Accessible vehicles cost more to buy and operate and may sit idle between requests; how would you get enough of them on the platform, and who pays? - What would you do about drivers who cancel after learning about a rider's wheelchair or guide dog? - How would you launch and evaluate the service in one city without withholding it from riders who need it?

Overview: A product design question that asks how to build a car-sharing service, modeled on Uber, for people with disabilities. It tests choosing which riders to serve first, mapping pain points across the whole trip, prioritizing rider-side and vehicle-supply solutions, and defining success metrics with guardrails.

Uber logo
Uber
Mar 26, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

Design a car-sharing platform, modeled on Uber, for people with disabilities. Explain which riders you would design for first, what goes wrong for them when they try to get a ride today, which product changes you would build and in what order, and how you would know the service is succeeding.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Which disabilities are in scope: mobility impairments, blindness or low vision, deafness or hard of hearing, cognitive disabilities, or all of them?
  • Is this a new standalone service, or an accessibility offering inside Uber's existing app and driver network?
  • Does "car sharing" here mean rides with a driver, as on Uber, or access to vehicles the rider drives themselves?
  • Which market is this for, given that accessibility law and the supply of wheelchair-accessible vehicles differ from country to country?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A scoped choice of which riders and disabilities to serve first, with the reason
  • Pain points across the whole trip: booking, waiting, boarding, riding, drop-off and the final stretch to the door
  • Solutions on both the rider side and the vehicle-and-driver side, prioritized with explicit criteria
  • How the service stays reliable and financially sustainable when suitable vehicles and trained drivers are scarce
  • A primary metric with guardrails, and the risks specific to this rider population

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Accessible vehicles cost more to buy and operate and may sit idle between requests; how would you get enough of them on the platform, and who pays?
  • What would you do about drivers who cancel after learning about a rider's wheelchair or guide dog?
  • How would you launch and evaluate the service in one city without withholding it from riders who need it?