Behavioral: Handling Negative Feedback and Resolving a Conflict at Work

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

A two-part behavioral question from a culture-fit interview: describe a time you received negative feedback and how you responded, then a conflict at work and how you handled it. It tests openness to criticism, self-awareness, constructive disagreement and evidence of real behavior change.

Behavioral: Handling Negative Feedback and Resolving a Conflict at Work

Company: Clickup

Role: Software Engineer

Category: Behavioral & Leadership

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Onsite

In a culture-fit conversation for a software engineering role, you are asked standard behavioral questions, including the two below. Answer each with one specific story from your own experience. ### Clarifying Questions - Should the feedback example be formal feedback, such as a performance review, or is informal feedback from a peer or a code reviewer fine? - Is the conflict expected to be with a peer, a manager, or a partner team? - How much detail should each story include before you pause for follow-up questions? ### Part 1 — Negative feedback Tell me about a time you received negative feedback. What was it, how did you respond, and what changed as a result? ```hint Real feedback, real change Choose feedback that genuinely stung and led to a visible change in how you work, not a strength in disguise. ``` ```hint Your first reaction counts Be ready to describe how you reacted in the moment, and how you checked whether the feedback was accurate. ``` #### What This Part Should Cover - Specific, substantive feedback, with its source identified by role - A non-defensive response: asking for examples, understanding the gap, owning it - A concrete change in behavior, and evidence that it worked - What the candidate does differently since then ### Part 2 — A conflict Tell me about a conflict you had at work and how you handled it. ```hint Two reasonable positions The strongest stories involve a disagreement in which both sides had a point. Be ready to argue the other side's position. ``` ```hint What settled it Think about what actually resolved it: data, a trial, a trade-off both sides accepted, or a decision by someone else. ``` #### What This Part Should Cover - A concrete disagreement with stakes for the work - How the candidate understood the other side and moved the discussion toward evidence - The resolution, including disagreeing and committing if the decision went the other way - The outcome for the project and for the working relationship ### What a Strong Answer Covers - Specific stories with first-person actions and concrete results - Openness to criticism shown through actual changes in behavior, not claims - Constructive handling of disagreement without blaming others - Self-awareness about the candidate's own contribution to each problem - Evidence of how the candidate responds to a demanding performance bar ### Follow-up Questions - Tell me about feedback you disagreed with. What did you do with it? - How do you give negative feedback to a peer? - Suppose the team holds a very high performance bar, with frequent and direct feedback. How do you work and grow in that kind of environment? - Looking back at the conflict, what would the other person say you could have done better?

Overview: A two-part behavioral question from a culture-fit interview: describe a time you received negative feedback and how you responded, then a conflict at work and how you handled it. It tests openness to criticism, self-awareness, constructive disagreement and evidence of real behavior change.

Read the full Clickup Software Engineer interview experience this question came from

|Home/Behavioral & Leadership/Clickup
Clickup logo
Clickup
Jul 11, 2026
mediumSoftware EngineerOnsiteBehavioral & Leadership
0
0

In a culture-fit conversation for a software engineering role, you are asked standard behavioral questions, including the two below. Answer each with one specific story from your own experience.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Should the feedback example be formal feedback, such as a performance review, or is informal feedback from a peer or a code reviewer fine?
  • Is the conflict expected to be with a peer, a manager, or a partner team?
  • How much detail should each story include before you pause for follow-up questions?

Part 1 — Negative feedback

Tell me about a time you received negative feedback. What was it, how did you respond, and what changed as a result?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Specific, substantive feedback, with its source identified by role
  • A non-defensive response: asking for examples, understanding the gap, owning it
  • A concrete change in behavior, and evidence that it worked
  • What the candidate does differently since then

Part 2 — A conflict

Tell me about a conflict you had at work and how you handled it.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • A concrete disagreement with stakes for the work
  • How the candidate understood the other side and moved the discussion toward evidence
  • The resolution, including disagreeing and committing if the decision went the other way
  • The outcome for the project and for the working relationship

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • Specific stories with first-person actions and concrete results
  • Openness to criticism shown through actual changes in behavior, not claims
  • Constructive handling of disagreement without blaming others
  • Self-awareness about the candidate's own contribution to each problem
  • Evidence of how the candidate responds to a demanding performance bar

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Tell me about feedback you disagreed with. What did you do with it?
  • How do you give negative feedback to a peer?
  • Suppose the team holds a very high performance bar, with frequent and direct feedback. How do you work and grow in that kind of environment?
  • Looking back at the conflict, what would the other person say you could have done better?
Loading comments...