Compare Two Rare-Event Rates with Different Exposure

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

Compare sparse event rates across unequal mileage using a two-sample Poisson framework, exact conditional testing, and honest uncertainty.

Compare Two Rare-Event Rates with Different Exposure

Company: Waymo

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Statistics & Math

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

# Compare Two Rare-Event Rates with Different Exposure Two versions were observed over different amounts of mileage, and each produced only a small number of events. Can you treat the estimated event rate of one version as a known value when computing a p-value for the other? Explain how you would compare the rates and report uncertainty. No event counts or mileages are supplied. ### What a Strong Answer Covers - Uncertainty in both estimated rates and a distinction from an externally fixed benchmark. - A count/exposure model and a valid two-sample comparison for sparse events. - Interpretation of zero counts, confidence intervals, and practical effect sizes. - Comparability of operating conditions and assumptions behind independent Poisson events. ```hint Condition on the total number of events Under a shared-rate null, ask how the total events should be allocated between two different exposure amounts. ``` ### Follow-up Questions - What if one version has zero observed events? - How would different mixes of operating conditions affect the comparison?

Overview: Compare sparse event rates across unequal mileage using a two-sample Poisson framework, exact conditional testing, and honest uncertainty.

Read the full Waymo Data Scientist interview experience this question came from

|Home/Statistics & Math/Waymo
Waymo logo
Waymo
Sep 28, 2026
mediumData ScientistTechnical ScreenStatistics & Math
0
0

Compare Two Rare-Event Rates with Different Exposure

Two versions were observed over different amounts of mileage, and each produced only a small number of events. Can you treat the estimated event rate of one version as a known value when computing a p-value for the other? Explain how you would compare the rates and report uncertainty. No event counts or mileages are supplied.

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • Uncertainty in both estimated rates and a distinction from an externally fixed benchmark.
  • A count/exposure model and a valid two-sample comparison for sparse events.
  • Interpretation of zero counts, confidence intervals, and practical effect sizes.
  • Comparability of operating conditions and assumptions behind independent Poisson events.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • What if one version has zero observed events?
  • How would different mixes of operating conditions affect the comparison?
Loading comments...