This question evaluates algorithmic problem-solving around interval overlap and time-complexity optimization, measuring the ability to determine the maximum team size given a core interval while reasoning about interval intersections and scalability; it is commonly asked to assess correctness and subquadratic runtime thinking, categorized under Coding & Algorithms and emphasizing practical algorithmic implementation. The follow-up evaluates combinatorics and counting under adjacency constraints with modular arithmetic and efficient handling of large parameters, commonly posed to test recurrence reasoning and scalable counting approaches, falling under combinatorics/dynamic programming and emphasizing conceptual understanding linked to practical algorithmic efficiency.
You are given n employees’ working-time intervals, where employee i works during the inclusive interval [startTime[i], endTime[i]].
You want to form a team such that:
Return the maximum possible team size.
startTime = [2, 5, 6, 8]
endTime = [5, 6, 10, 9]
3
Grace Hopper’s scheduling rule: you must assign processes to time slots so that no process occupies two consecutive time slots.
Given:
n_processes = n
(number of distinct processes, labeled
1..n
)
n_intervals = m
(number of time slots)
Count the number of valid allocations (sequences) of length m over n processes such that:
t > 1
,
assignment[t] != assignment[t-1]
Return the count modulo (10^9 + 7).
If n = 3, m = 2, valid sequences include (1,2), (1,3), (2,1), etc., but not (1,1).
n, m
efficiently (assume you may need near
O(log m)
or
O(m)
time, depending on constraints).