Count distinct XOR results from nondecreasing index triples of a permutation. Allow repeated indices and preserve the distinction between counting triples and counting their resulting values.
### Problem
You are given an array `nums` of length `n` that is a permutation of the integers `1` through `n`.
For every index triple satisfying `0 <= i <= j <= k < n`, consider the value:
```text
nums[i] XOR nums[j] XOR nums[k]
```
Return the number of distinct values obtainable from all such triples. Equal indices are allowed, so the same array element may be used more than once in a triple. Count resulting XOR values, rather than the number of triples producing them.
### C++ Interface
```cpp
class Solution {
public:
int uniqueXorTriplets(vector<int>& nums) {
}
};
```
### Examples
**Example 1**
```text
Input: nums = [1]
Output: 1
```
The only index triple is `(0,0,0)`, whose value is `1 XOR 1 XOR 1 = 1`.
**Example 2**
```text
Input: nums = [4,2,1,3]
Output: 8
```
The distinct values are `0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7`. Each input value is obtained by using its own index three times. Additional witnesses include `1 XOR 2 XOR 3 = 0`, `4 XOR 2 XOR 3 = 5`, `4 XOR 1 XOR 3 = 6`, and `4 XOR 1 XOR 2 = 7`. Each witness can use indices in nondecreasing order. No larger value is possible for these inputs.
### Constraints
- `1 <= n == nums.length <= 100000`.
- `1 <= nums[i] <= n`.
- `nums` contains every integer from `1` through `n` exactly once.
### Clarifying Questions
- Must the three indices be different? No. The inequalities are non-strict.
- Does the array have to be sorted? No. Any permutation is valid.
- Is zero an eligible XOR result even though it is absent from the input? Yes, if a valid triple produces it.
- Should duplicate XOR results be counted again for different triples? No. Each resulting value counts once.
### What a Strong Answer Covers
- The permutation promise and the permitted repeated indices.
- The distinction between triples and their distinct XOR results.
- Completeness of the claimed result count for all valid triples.
- Small arrays and resource and numeric bounds up to `100000` elements.
### Follow-up Questions
- What would change in the definition if the three indices had to be strictly increasing?
- How would the requested result differ if the task counted index triples instead of distinct XOR values?
```hint Use the full value set
Every value from 1 through n is available, and XOR is unchanged when the three operands are reordered. Bound the possible result bits, then prove which values inside that bound can actually be formed; treat n = 1 and n = 2 separately.
```
Overview: Count distinct XOR results from nondecreasing index triples of a permutation. Allow repeated indices and preserve the distinction between counting triples and counting their resulting values.
You are given an array nums of length n that is a permutation of the integers 1 through n.
For every index triple satisfying 0 <= i <= j <= k < n, consider the value:
nums[i] XOR nums[j] XOR nums[k]
Return the number of distinct values obtainable from all such triples. Equal indices are allowed, so the same array element may be used more than once in a triple. Count resulting XOR values, rather than the number of triples producing them.
C++ Interface
class Solution {
public:
int uniqueXorTriplets(vector<int>& nums) {
}
};
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1]
Output: 1
The only index triple is (0,0,0), whose value is 1 XOR 1 XOR 1 = 1.
Example 2
Input: nums = [4,2,1,3]
Output: 8
The distinct values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Each input value is obtained by using its own index three times. Additional witnesses include 1 XOR 2 XOR 3 = 0, 4 XOR 2 XOR 3 = 5, 4 XOR 1 XOR 3 = 6, and 4 XOR 1 XOR 2 = 7. Each witness can use indices in nondecreasing order. No larger value is possible for these inputs.
Constraints
1 <= n == nums.length <= 100000
.
1 <= nums[i] <= n
.
nums
contains every integer from
1
through
n
exactly once.
Clarifying Questions Guidance
Must the three indices be different? No. The inequalities are non-strict.
Does the array have to be sorted? No. Any permutation is valid.
Is zero an eligible XOR result even though it is absent from the input? Yes, if a valid triple produces it.
Should duplicate XOR results be counted again for different triples? No. Each resulting value counts once.
What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance
The permutation promise and the permitted repeated indices.
The distinction between triples and their distinct XOR results.
Completeness of the claimed result count for all valid triples.
Small arrays and resource and numeric bounds up to
100000
elements.
Follow-up Questions Guidance
What would change in the definition if the three indices had to be strictly increasing?
How would the requested result differ if the task counted index triples instead of distinct XOR values?