Determine Metrics to Evaluate Notification Impact on Users

Quick Overview

Evaluates product analytics judgment for Facebook push notifications, including how to measure helpful versus harmful notifications, design an event-notification experiment, and balance short-term clicks against retention, fatigue, and opt-out guardrails. Strong answers build a metric hierarchy and use causal measurement.

Determine Metrics to Evaluate Notification Impact on Users

Company: Meta

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Analytics & Experimentation

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Onsite

##### Scenario Facebook has multiple types of push notifications and is considering launching a new one that tells you a friend plans to attend an event. ##### Question Which data and metrics would you use to determine whether an existing notification is helpful or harmful to users? What analyses or experiments would you run to decide whether to launch the new event-based notification? ##### Hints Think funnel metrics, user experience trade-offs, A/B tests, downstream engagement and churn.

Quick Answer: Evaluates product analytics judgment for Facebook push notifications, including how to measure helpful versus harmful notifications, design an event-notification experiment, and balance short-term clicks against retention, fatigue, and opt-out guardrails. Strong answers build a metric hierarchy and use causal measurement.

|Home/Analytics & Experimentation/Meta
Meta logo
Meta
Jul 12, 2025, 6:59 PM
mediumData ScientistOnsiteAnalytics & Experimentation
14
0

Determine Metrics to Evaluate Notification Impact on Users

Facebook sends several types of push notifications and is considering a new notification that tells a user when a friend plans to attend an event. You are asked to evaluate whether notifications are helping users or creating harm.

Constraints & Assumptions

  • Treat this as a product analytics and experimentation question, not a notification-ranking implementation problem.
  • Assume notification delivery, opens, dismissals, app sessions, event interactions, settings changes, and retention can be logged at user and notification-type level.
  • Preserve user experience: a notification can increase clicks while still being harmful if it causes opt-outs, churn, or poor long-term engagement.
  • Do not assume the new event notification is useful until demand and incremental value are measured.

Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance

  • Is the evaluation for one existing notification type, all notification types, or the new event notification?
  • What is the main product objective: event discovery, meaningful interactions, app retention, or notification quality?
  • Are we allowed to run randomized experiments, or must we rely on observational data?
  • Which users are eligible for the event notification, and how frequently could they receive it?

Part 1 - Evaluate Existing Notifications

Which data and metrics would you use to determine whether an existing notification is helpful or harmful to users?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Delivery, open, click-through, downstream action, dismissal, mute, opt-out, and uninstall signals.
  • User-level outcomes such as sessions, retention, time to next session, notification setting changes, and long-term engagement.
  • Segmentation by notification type, user cohort, device, market, time of day, notification frequency, and relationship strength.
  • A distinction between short-term engagement and durable user value.

Part 2 - Decide Whether to Launch the Event Notification

What analyses or experiments would you run to decide whether to launch the friend-attending-event notification?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Pre-launch opportunity sizing and relevance checks using event attendance, friend graph, event browsing, and RSVP behavior.
  • A randomized experiment or holdout design that measures incremental event engagement rather than raw notification opens.
  • Guardrail metrics for notification fatigue, opt-outs, hides, uninstalls, negative feedback, and cannibalization of other surfaces.
  • Launch criteria that balance primary lift, statistical confidence, user harm, and heterogeneous treatment effects.

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

A strong answer builds a metric hierarchy, separates notification-level and user-level measurement, proposes a credible experiment, and explains how to interpret trade-offs when clicks rise but quality or retention falls.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • How would your plan change for new users versus highly active users?
  • How would you measure notification fatigue over several weeks?
  • If the experiment improves event RSVPs but increases notification opt-outs, what would you recommend?
Loading comments...