Diagnose Violations of Linear Regression Assumptions

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

Review linear regression assumptions by purpose, then connect each failure mode to diagnostics and remedies. Separate coefficient identification, standard-error validity, and predictive performance.

Diagnose Violations of Linear Regression Assumptions

Company: Snapchat

Role: Data Scientist

Category: Statistics & Math

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

State the assumptions needed to interpret ordinary least squares estimates and common inferential statistics. For each important assumption, explain how you would diagnose a possible violation and what you would change if the assumption does not hold. ### Constraints & Assumptions - Distinguish assumptions needed for unbiased or consistent coefficient estimates from assumptions needed for conventional standard errors and exact small-sample tests. - Do not treat a single diagnostic test as proof that an assumption is true. - Include prediction concerns as well as coefficient interpretation. ### Clarifying Questions to Ask - Is the goal causal interpretation, descriptive association, or out-of-sample prediction? - Are observations cross-sectional, clustered, or ordered in time? - Is the model intended to support confidence intervals and hypothesis tests? - How large is the sample relative to the number of predictors? ```hint Organize by failure mode Separate functional-form problems, dependence, unequal variance, collinearity, influential observations, and distributional assumptions. ``` ### What a Strong Answer Covers - Linearity in parameters and an adequate conditional-mean specification. - Exogeneity and why residual plots cannot establish it. - Independence or a correctly modeled dependence structure. - Homoskedasticity, multicollinearity, influence, and residual normality in their proper roles. - Diagnostics, remedies, and the limitations of each remedy. ### Follow-up Questions - Which assumption is most important for a causal interpretation of one coefficient? - When are heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors insufficient? - How would your workflow change for a time series with autocorrelated errors?

Overview: Review linear regression assumptions by purpose, then connect each failure mode to diagnostics and remedies. Separate coefficient identification, standard-error validity, and predictive performance.

Read the full Snapchat Data Scientist interview experience this question came from

|Home/Statistics & Math/Snapchat
Snapchat logo
Snapchat
Aug 13, 2026
mediumData ScientistTechnical ScreenStatistics & Math
0
0

State the assumptions needed to interpret ordinary least squares estimates and common inferential statistics. For each important assumption, explain how you would diagnose a possible violation and what you would change if the assumption does not hold.

Constraints & Assumptions

  • Distinguish assumptions needed for unbiased or consistent coefficient estimates from assumptions needed for conventional standard errors and exact small-sample tests.
  • Do not treat a single diagnostic test as proof that an assumption is true.
  • Include prediction concerns as well as coefficient interpretation.

Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance

  • Is the goal causal interpretation, descriptive association, or out-of-sample prediction?
  • Are observations cross-sectional, clustered, or ordered in time?
  • Is the model intended to support confidence intervals and hypothesis tests?
  • How large is the sample relative to the number of predictors?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • Linearity in parameters and an adequate conditional-mean specification.
  • Exogeneity and why residual plots cannot establish it.
  • Independence or a correctly modeled dependence structure.
  • Homoskedasticity, multicollinearity, influence, and residual normality in their proper roles.
  • Diagnostics, remedies, and the limitations of each remedy.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Which assumption is most important for a causal interpretation of one coefficient?
  • When are heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors insufficient?
  • How would your workflow change for a time series with autocorrelated errors?
Loading comments...