Disagreeing with a Manager's Decision and Holding Your Position Under Pushback

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

A senior behavioral prompt pair: describe disagreeing with a decision made by your manager or a senior leader, and a time you kept pushing for a course of action despite resistance from others. It assesses evidence-based challenge, influence, and committing once a decision is made.

Disagreeing with a Manager's Decision and Holding Your Position Under Pushback

Company: Amazon

Role: Software Engineer

Category: Behavioral & Leadership

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

This behavioral round tests how you handle disagreement with the people who own a decision, and how firmly you stand behind a course of action you believe is right. Answer both prompts with specific situations from your own work, using a different story for each. ### Constraints and Clarifications - Each story should be something you personally drove, with real consequences for a project, a team, customers or production. - The role is senior, so the interviewer is listening for judgment: when to push, how hard, and when to commit to a decision you argued against. - Expect detailed follow-up questions on each story, so choose situations you remember well. ### Clarifying Questions - Does the disagreement in the first prompt need to be with my direct manager, or can it be with another senior leader? - Can the disagreement be with a peer instead of someone senior, provided the issue was one I considered very important to the business? - Is a story in which my position turned out to be wrong acceptable? - Would you like more depth on the technical substance of the disagreement, or on how I handled the people involved? ### Part 1 — Disagreeing with a manager's decision Tell me about a time you disagreed with a decision made by your manager or by someone more senior than you. What was decided, why did you think it was wrong, how did you raise it, and what happened next? The prompt also comes in a broader form: the other person can be a peer rather than someone senior, and the disagreement should be a strong one about something you saw as very important to the business. ```hint Show your basis Make clear what evidence or reasoning drove your view, and what you did to find out whether the decision-maker knew something you did not. ``` #### What This Part Should Cover - The decision, what was at stake, and the specific grounds for disagreeing - How, when and to whom the concern was raised, and what alternatives were offered - What the candidate did once the decision was final, including committing to it if it stood - The result and what the candidate learned ### Part 2 — Holding your ground under pushback Tell me about a time you kept pressing for a decision or a course of action even though other people resisted it. Who pushed back and why, how did you move things forward, and how did it end? ```hint Conviction versus stubbornness Be ready to say what evidence would have changed your mind, and how you kept the people who disagreed engaged instead of overriding them. ``` #### What This Part Should Cover - Why the course of action mattered and what the strongest objections were - How the candidate built support: data, prototypes, small experiments, written proposals or escalation - How working relationships held up during and after the disagreement - A measurable outcome and an honest reflection ### What a Strong Answer Covers - First-person stories with real stakes, specific actions and quantified results - Positions grounded in customer or business impact rather than personal preference - Respectful, evidence-based challenge, followed by full commitment once a decision is made - Openness to being wrong, and the ability to say what would change their mind - No blaming or caricaturing of the other people in the story ### Follow-up Questions - What would you have done if your manager had listened to your case and still overruled you? - Tell me about a time someone pushed back on you and turned out to be right. - When is going above your manager the right call, and how do you do it without damaging the relationship? - Looking back at either story, what would you do differently?

Overview: A senior behavioral prompt pair: describe disagreeing with a decision made by your manager or a senior leader, and a time you kept pushing for a course of action despite resistance from others. It assesses evidence-based challenge, influence, and committing once a decision is made.

Read the full Amazon Software Engineer interview experience this question came from

Amazon logo
Amazon
Jun 19, 2026
mediumSoftware EngineerOtherBehavioral & Leadership
0
0

This behavioral round tests how you handle disagreement with the people who own a decision, and how firmly you stand behind a course of action you believe is right. Answer both prompts with specific situations from your own work, using a different story for each.

Constraints and Clarifications

  • Each story should be something you personally drove, with real consequences for a project, a team, customers or production.
  • The role is senior, so the interviewer is listening for judgment: when to push, how hard, and when to commit to a decision you argued against.
  • Expect detailed follow-up questions on each story, so choose situations you remember well.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Does the disagreement in the first prompt need to be with my direct manager, or can it be with another senior leader?
  • Can the disagreement be with a peer instead of someone senior, provided the issue was one I considered very important to the business?
  • Is a story in which my position turned out to be wrong acceptable?
  • Would you like more depth on the technical substance of the disagreement, or on how I handled the people involved?

Part 1 — Disagreeing with a manager's decision

Tell me about a time you disagreed with a decision made by your manager or by someone more senior than you. What was decided, why did you think it was wrong, how did you raise it, and what happened next? The prompt also comes in a broader form: the other person can be a peer rather than someone senior, and the disagreement should be a strong one about something you saw as very important to the business.

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • The decision, what was at stake, and the specific grounds for disagreeing
  • How, when and to whom the concern was raised, and what alternatives were offered
  • What the candidate did once the decision was final, including committing to it if it stood
  • The result and what the candidate learned

Part 2 — Holding your ground under pushback

Tell me about a time you kept pressing for a decision or a course of action even though other people resisted it. Who pushed back and why, how did you move things forward, and how did it end?

What This Part Should Cover Guidance

  • Why the course of action mattered and what the strongest objections were
  • How the candidate built support: data, prototypes, small experiments, written proposals or escalation
  • How working relationships held up during and after the disagreement
  • A measurable outcome and an honest reflection

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • First-person stories with real stakes, specific actions and quantified results
  • Positions grounded in customer or business impact rather than personal preference
  • Respectful, evidence-based challenge, followed by full commitment once a decision is made
  • Openness to being wrong, and the ability to say what would change their mind
  • No blaming or caricaturing of the other people in the story

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • What would you have done if your manager had listened to your case and still overruled you?
  • Tell me about a time someone pushed back on you and turned out to be right.
  • When is going above your manager the right call, and how do you do it without damaging the relationship?
  • Looking back at either story, what would you do differently?