Type I and Type II errors in A/B testing evaluates statistical assumptions, hypothesis testing trade-offs, uncertainty, edge cases, and practical interpretation in an experimentation interview. A strong answer distinguishes false positives from false negatives, explains business impact, and shows how to validate conclusions clearly.
##### Scenario
Meta Data Scientist onsite round focused on statistical reasoning behind product experimentation.
##### Question
Explain the difference between Type I and Type II errors in A/B testing and how you would choose acceptable levels for each at Meta. If the metric distribution is highly skewed with outliers, how would you estimate treatment lift and construct a confidence interval?
##### Hints
Discuss α vs β, power analysis, non-parametric tests, bootstrapping or transforms for skewed data.
Quick Answer: Type I and Type II errors in A/B testing evaluates statistical assumptions, hypothesis testing trade-offs, uncertainty, edge cases, and practical interpretation in an experimentation interview. A strong answer distinguishes false positives from false negatives, explains business impact, and shows how to validate conclusions clearly.
A/B Testing Errors and Estimation Under Skewed Metrics
Context
You are analyzing an A/B experiment for a product feature. You need to explain the statistical error types and defend thresholds you would use. The primary metric can be heavy-tailed (e.g., time spent, revenue per user) with outliers.
Tasks
Define and contrast Type I and Type II errors in A/B testing, and explain how you would choose acceptable levels (α and β/power) in this context.
If the metric distribution is highly skewed with outliers, describe how you would estimate the treatment lift and construct a confidence interval. Discuss appropriate methods (e.g., non-parametric tests, bootstrapping, or transformations) and when you would use them.
Clarifying Questions to Ask Guidance
Clarify the random variables, distributional assumptions, independence assumptions, and desired output.
Show enough derivation for the interviewer to follow the reasoning.
Explain how you would validate the result with simulation or sensitivity checks.
What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance
A correct setup with definitions, formulas, and boundary conditions.
A step-by-step derivation or estimation plan.
Interpretation of the result, including uncertainty and practical limitations.
Checks for assumptions, edge cases, and numerical stability.
Follow-up Questions Guidance
How would the result change if the assumptions were relaxed?
Can you verify the answer with a simulation?
What is the most likely source of estimation error?