Google Flights: Find a Traveler Pain Point and Propose a Product Improvement

Quick Overview

A product improvement question for a Google product manager interview: choose a traveler segment for Google Flights, find a pain point across the whole trip journey, and propose and prioritize a feature. It tests segmentation, goal setting, prioritization and choosing success metrics with guardrails.

Google Flights: Find a Traveler Pain Point and Propose a Product Improvement

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are interviewing for a product manager role at Google and are asked how you would make Google Flights, Google's flight search and fare comparison product, better. Decide who you are improving it for, which problem you are solving for them, and what you would build. ```hint Walk the whole trip Go from "we should take a trip" to the day of travel and note every point where a traveler leaves Google Flights for another tool or a group chat. Those exits are where an improvement can earn its place. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Is the goal more searches, more bookings handed off to airlines and travel agencies, or better trip outcomes for travelers, and should the change protect revenue from those partners? - Should I focus on travelers planning on their phones or on desktop, and on the US market or worldwide? - Are business travelers who book through company travel tools in scope, or only leisure travelers? - Since most bookings are completed on an airline or agency site, are ideas that depend on owning the booking (changes, refunds, delay help) in bounds? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A goal tied to both traveler value and Google's role in travel (sending qualified travelers to booking partners and organizing travel information). - Segmentation of travelers by trip type, with one segment chosen for a stated reason. - Pain points drawn from the full trip journey, not only the results page, ranked by how common they are and how poorly they are solved today. - Two or three distinct solutions, one picked with a reason and cut down to a first version. - Success metrics with a guardrail, and risks such as partner conflicts, compute cost or how rarely people plan trips. ### Follow-up Questions - Most people use a flight search tool only a few times a year. How does that change the metric you would use to judge success? - Your feature reduces how often travelers click through to booking partners. Would you still launch it? - How would you know whether the feature helped travelers rather than just adding clutter to the results page?

Overview: A product improvement question for a Google product manager interview: choose a traveler segment for Google Flights, find a pain point across the whole trip journey, and propose and prioritize a feature. It tests segmentation, goal setting, prioritization and choosing success metrics with guardrails.

Google logo
Google
Dec 26, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are interviewing for a product manager role at Google and are asked how you would make Google Flights, Google's flight search and fare comparison product, better. Decide who you are improving it for, which problem you are solving for them, and what you would build.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Is the goal more searches, more bookings handed off to airlines and travel agencies, or better trip outcomes for travelers, and should the change protect revenue from those partners?
  • Should I focus on travelers planning on their phones or on desktop, and on the US market or worldwide?
  • Are business travelers who book through company travel tools in scope, or only leisure travelers?
  • Since most bookings are completed on an airline or agency site, are ideas that depend on owning the booking (changes, refunds, delay help) in bounds?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A goal tied to both traveler value and Google's role in travel (sending qualified travelers to booking partners and organizing travel information).
  • Segmentation of travelers by trip type, with one segment chosen for a stated reason.
  • Pain points drawn from the full trip journey, not only the results page, ranked by how common they are and how poorly they are solved today.
  • Two or three distinct solutions, one picked with a reason and cut down to a first version.
  • Success metrics with a guardrail, and risks such as partner conflicts, compute cost or how rarely people plan trips.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Most people use a flight search tool only a few times a year. How does that change the metric you would use to judge success?
  • Your feature reduces how often travelers click through to booking partners. Would you still launch it?
  • How would you know whether the feature helped travelers rather than just adding clutter to the results page?