Improve robustness of graph cycle detection code

Quick Overview

This question evaluates a candidate's competence in software engineering fundamentals—covering graph algorithms and dependency analysis, scalability and memory considerations, error handling and observability, testing strategy, and API and extensibility design for production systems.

Improve robustness of graph cycle detection code

Company: Uber

Role: Software Engineer

Category: Software Engineering Fundamentals

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

You have written code to detect cycles in a directed dependency graph of services, where nodes represent services and edges represent dependencies between services. In a real-world production environment, this code will be part of a larger system that validates service configurations before deployment. **Question:** How would you improve this cycle detection component so that it works better in a real-world setting? Discuss considerations and potential improvements in areas such as: - Code readability and maintainability - Handling large-scale graphs (performance, memory) - Error handling and edge cases (e.g., invalid or missing data) - Logging, monitoring, and observability - Testing strategy (unit tests, integration tests, property-based tests) - API design (inputs/outputs, how results are surfaced to other services or to users) - Extensibility for future requirements (e.g., reporting all cycles, not just existence) Provide concrete examples and rationale for the improvements you propose.

Quick Answer: This question evaluates a candidate's competence in software engineering fundamentals—covering graph algorithms and dependency analysis, scalability and memory considerations, error handling and observability, testing strategy, and API and extensibility design for production systems.

|Home/Software Engineering Fundamentals/Uber
Uber logo
Uber
Dec 8, 2025, 6:42 PM
mediumSoftware EngineerTechnical ScreenSoftware Engineering Fundamentals
6
0

You have written code to detect cycles in a directed dependency graph of services, where nodes represent services and edges represent dependencies between services.

In a real-world production environment, this code will be part of a larger system that validates service configurations before deployment.

Question:

How would you improve this cycle detection component so that it works better in a real-world setting? Discuss considerations and potential improvements in areas such as:

  • Code readability and maintainability
  • Handling large-scale graphs (performance, memory)
  • Error handling and edge cases (e.g., invalid or missing data)
  • Logging, monitoring, and observability
  • Testing strategy (unit tests, integration tests, property-based tests)
  • API design (inputs/outputs, how results are surfaced to other services or to users)
  • Extensibility for future requirements (e.g., reporting all cycles, not just existence)

Provide concrete examples and rationale for the improvements you propose.

Loading comments...