Answer independent binary-string trade queries while counting active sections across the whole string. Restrict both trade steps to each substring and preserve its virtual boundary rules.
### Problem
You are given a binary string `s`, where `1` marks an active section and `0` marks an inactive section, and inclusive, zero-based queries `[l, r]`.
For each query independently, you may perform at most one trade entirely within `s[l...r]`. A trade has two ordered steps:
1. Change a contiguous block of `1`s immediately surrounded by `0`s into zeros.
2. In the resulting substring, change a contiguous block of `0`s immediately surrounded by `1`s into ones.
For this query's surrounding-character checks, treat its substring as `"1" + s[l...r] + "1"`. The added ones are not original sections and are not counted.
Return one answer per query: the maximum number of active sections in the **whole string `s`** after that query's allowed trade. Characters outside `[l,r]` remain unchanged. Queries do not accumulate changes; each starts with the original string. Performing no trade is allowed, but performing only the second step is not.
### C++ Interface
```cpp
class Solution {
public:
vector<int> maxActiveSectionsAfterTrade(string s, vector<vector<int>>& queries) {
}
};
```
### Examples
**Example 1**
```text
Input: s = "0011000100", queries = [[0,9],[1,8],[2,7],[4,9]]
Output: [8,7,3,8]
```
The original string has three ones. For `[0,9]`, changing the ones at indices `2,3` to zero and then changing indices `0...6` to one gives eight active sections. For `[1,8]`, the same first step followed by changing indices `1...6` to one gives seven. Query `[2,7]` permits no legal first step and leaves the global count at three. For `[4,9]`, trading the one at index `7` makes that entire six-character substring active; the two ones outside it bring the answer to eight.
**Example 2**
```text
Input: s = "110010001", queries = [[0,8],[3,6],[0,3],[5,5]]
Output: [9,7,4,4]
```
The original global count is four. In `[0,8]`, trading the one at index `4` can make the whole string active. In `[3,6]`, the substring is `"0100"`; completing its trade makes its four positions active, while three original ones outside the query remain, giving seven. Neither `[0,3]` nor `[5,5]` allows a first step, so their answers remain four.
### Constraints
- `1 <= n == s.length <= 100000`.
- `1 <= queries.length <= 100000`.
- Every `s[i]` is `0` or `1`.
- Each query contains exactly two integers `[l, r]`.
- `0 <= l <= r < n`.
### Clarifying Questions
- Does an answer count only ones inside the queried substring? No. It counts the whole string after changing only that substring.
- Do actual characters just outside the query determine whether its edge blocks are surrounded? No. Use the query's two added boundary ones.
- Do earlier answers change the string for later queries? No. All queries are independent.
- What happens if no trade is legal? Return the original string's active count for that query.
### What a Strong Answer Covers
- Both ordered trade steps, their legality inside the queried substring, and the option of no trade.
- Query-specific surrounding characters and their exclusion from the count.
- The whole-string answer and independence of different queries.
- Single-position queries, queries reaching string edges, and the maximum string and query counts.
- An optimality argument and suitable time, space, and numeric bounds.
### Follow-up Questions
- Can a query containing only zeros still have a positive answer under this whole-string counting rule?
- Which part of the specification would change if query effects were cumulative instead of independent?
```hint Reuse the unchanged string
Describe the string by its maximal zero and one runs. A trade that removes an internal one-run can gain the lengths of its two neighboring zero-runs. Precompute range maxima for fully included neighboring pairs, and handle zero-runs clipped by a query boundary separately.
```
Overview: Answer independent binary-string trade queries while counting active sections across the whole string. Restrict both trade steps to each substring and preserve its virtual boundary rules.
You are given a binary string s, where 1 marks an active section and 0 marks an inactive section, and inclusive, zero-based queries [l, r].
For each query independently, you may perform at most one trade entirely within s[l...r]. A trade has two ordered steps:
Change a contiguous block of
1
s immediately surrounded by
0
s into zeros.
In the resulting substring, change a contiguous block of
0
s immediately surrounded by
1
s into ones.
For this query's surrounding-character checks, treat its substring as "1" + s[l...r] + "1". The added ones are not original sections and are not counted.
Return one answer per query: the maximum number of active sections in the whole string s after that query's allowed trade. Characters outside [l,r] remain unchanged. Queries do not accumulate changes; each starts with the original string. Performing no trade is allowed, but performing only the second step is not.
Input: s = "0011000100", queries = [[0,9],[1,8],[2,7],[4,9]]
Output: [8,7,3,8]
The original string has three ones. For [0,9], changing the ones at indices 2,3 to zero and then changing indices 0...6 to one gives eight active sections. For [1,8], the same first step followed by changing indices 1...6 to one gives seven. Query [2,7] permits no legal first step and leaves the global count at three. For [4,9], trading the one at index 7 makes that entire six-character substring active; the two ones outside it bring the answer to eight.
Example 2
Input: s = "110010001", queries = [[0,8],[3,6],[0,3],[5,5]]
Output: [9,7,4,4]
The original global count is four. In [0,8], trading the one at index 4 can make the whole string active. In [3,6], the substring is "0100"; completing its trade makes its four positions active, while three original ones outside the query remain, giving seven. Neither [0,3] nor [5,5] allows a first step, so their answers remain four.
Constraints
1 <= n == s.length <= 100000
.
1 <= queries.length <= 100000
.
Every
s[i]
is
0
or
1
.
Each query contains exactly two integers
[l, r]
.
0 <= l <= r < n
.
Clarifying Questions Guidance
Does an answer count only ones inside the queried substring? No. It counts the whole string after changing only that substring.
Do actual characters just outside the query determine whether its edge blocks are surrounded? No. Use the query's two added boundary ones.
Do earlier answers change the string for later queries? No. All queries are independent.
What happens if no trade is legal? Return the original string's active count for that query.
What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance
Both ordered trade steps, their legality inside the queried substring, and the option of no trade.
Query-specific surrounding characters and their exclusion from the count.
The whole-string answer and independence of different queries.
Single-position queries, queries reaching string edges, and the maximum string and query counts.
An optimality argument and suitable time, space, and numeric bounds.
Follow-up Questions Guidance
Can a query containing only zeros still have a positive answer under this whole-string counting rule?
Which part of the specification would change if query effects were cumulative instead of independent?