Pick and Defend LinkedIn's Next Major Product Investment

Quick Overview

A LinkedIn product manager strategy prompt that asks the candidate to choose the next thing LinkedIn should build and defend that choice. It tests goal setting tied to the mission, choosing among job seekers, recruiters and other member groups, prioritizing solutions in a two-sided marketplace, and defining success metrics with guardrails.

Pick and Defend LinkedIn's Next Major Product Investment

Company: LinkedIn

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are a product manager at LinkedIn. Make the case for the next thing LinkedIn should build: choose the opportunity you would invest in, explain why it beats the alternatives, and say how you would know it worked. ```hint Find the gap before the feature Start from LinkedIn's mission and the groups it serves (job seekers, recruiters, students, creators, sales teams), find the one where a step of their journey is clearly broken, and commit to it instead of offering a feature for everyone. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Is the aim of this bet engagement, revenue from lines such as Premium, hiring products and ads, or a stronger professional graph, or is the goal my call? - Should I stay inside LinkedIn's existing ecosystem of members, recruiters and advertisers, or is an adjacent new business in scope? - Are we looking for something that can ship within a year, or a multi-year strategic bet? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A goal anchored in LinkedIn's mission and business model, set before any ideas - A survey of member and customer segments with a reasoned choice of one to serve - Pain points drawn from that segment's journey, and solutions that use assets only LinkedIn has, such as its identity data, professional graph and hiring marketplace - Prioritization by impact, effort and risk, including the effect on the other side of the marketplace - A north-star metric, supporting metrics and guardrails, plus a cheap way to validate before scaling ### Follow-up Questions - Your idea needs employers to do more work or share more data. Why would they, and what happens if most of them do not? - How would you run an experiment in a two-sided marketplace where treating one job posting changes what applicants do on other postings? - Which alternative did you rank second, and what evidence would make you switch to it?

Overview: A LinkedIn product manager strategy prompt that asks the candidate to choose the next thing LinkedIn should build and defend that choice. It tests goal setting tied to the mission, choosing among job seekers, recruiters and other member groups, prioritizing solutions in a two-sided marketplace, and defining success metrics with guardrails.

LinkedIn logo
LinkedIn
Jun 13, 2025
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are a product manager at LinkedIn. Make the case for the next thing LinkedIn should build: choose the opportunity you would invest in, explain why it beats the alternatives, and say how you would know it worked.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Is the aim of this bet engagement, revenue from lines such as Premium, hiring products and ads, or a stronger professional graph, or is the goal my call?
  • Should I stay inside LinkedIn's existing ecosystem of members, recruiters and advertisers, or is an adjacent new business in scope?
  • Are we looking for something that can ship within a year, or a multi-year strategic bet?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A goal anchored in LinkedIn's mission and business model, set before any ideas
  • A survey of member and customer segments with a reasoned choice of one to serve
  • Pain points drawn from that segment's journey, and solutions that use assets only LinkedIn has, such as its identity data, professional graph and hiring marketplace
  • Prioritization by impact, effort and risk, including the effect on the other side of the marketplace
  • A north-star metric, supporting metrics and guardrails, plus a cheap way to validate before scaling

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Your idea needs employers to do more work or share more data. Why would they, and what happens if most of them do not?
  • How would you run an experiment in a two-sided marketplace where treating one job posting changes what applicants do on other postings?
  • Which alternative did you rank second, and what evidence would make you switch to it?