Prove That Lasso Can Be Written as a Quadratic Program
Company: Point72
Role: Quantitative Researcher
Category: Statistics & Math
Difficulty: medium
Interview Round: Technical Screen
# Prove That Lasso Can Be Written as a Quadratic Program
For a real matrix $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$, response $y\in\mathbb{R}^n$, and $\lambda>0$, consider the Lasso problem
$$\min_{\beta\in\mathbb{R}^p}\;\frac12\lVert y-X\beta\rVert_2^2+\lambda\lVert\beta\rVert_1.$$
Can it be expressed as a quadratic program? Give an explicit formulation and rigorously prove equivalence of optimal values and the correspondence of minimizers. Explain whether convexity or uniqueness requires $X$ to have full column rank.
### What a Strong Answer Covers
- A quadratic objective and linear constraints using auxiliary variables or coefficient splitting.
- Both directions of the equivalence argument, including why the absolute-value bound is tight at an optimum.
- A positive-semidefinite quadratic matrix and a correct distinction between convexity and uniqueness.
```hint Represent absolute values
Look for linear inequalities that force an auxiliary variable to upper-bound both signs of a coefficient.
```
### Follow-up Questions
- What changes in the equivalence argument if the penalty is zero?
- How would you leave an intercept unpenalized?
Overview: Derive the Lasso quadratic-program formulation and prove equivalence, convexity, minimizer correspondence, and rank-related uniqueness.
Prove That Lasso Can Be Written as a Quadratic Program
Point72
Sep 7, 2026
mediumQuantitative ResearcherTechnical ScreenStatistics & Math
0
0
Prove That Lasso Can Be Written as a Quadratic Program
For a real matrix X∈Rn×p, response y∈Rn, and λ>0, consider the Lasso problem
minβ∈Rp21∥y−Xβ∥22+λ∥β∥1.
Can it be expressed as a quadratic program? Give an explicit formulation and rigorously prove equivalence of optimal values and the correspondence of minimizers. Explain whether convexity or uniqueness requires X to have full column rank.
What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance
A quadratic objective and linear constraints using auxiliary variables or coefficient splitting.
Both directions of the equivalence argument, including why the absolute-value bound is tight at an optimum.
A positive-semidefinite quadratic matrix and a correct distinction between convexity and uniqueness.
Follow-up Questions Guidance
What changes in the equivalence argument if the penalty is zero?