Rate Limit an API During a Traffic Attack

Read the full interview experience this question came from →

Quick Overview

Design API rate limiting with token buckets, layered identities, endpoint costs, distributed-state tradeoffs, and measurable protection of legitimate traffic.

Rate Limit an API During a Traffic Attack

Company: Render

Role: Software Engineer

Category: System Design

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Technical Screen

After identifying high-volume client addresses in API logs, design rate limiting to protect the API during a denial-of-service incident. Explain the enforcement point, identity, algorithm, and failure behavior. ### Constraints & Assumptions The source asks how to rate limit after a log-analysis task. Request volume alone does not establish abuse, and an IP can represent many legitimate clients. No fixed traffic scale or limit is specified. ### Clarifying Questions Which endpoints and resources are saturated? Can clients authenticate? Are bursts legitimate? What limits can be enforced at the edge versus inside the service? What should happen if the shared limiter is unavailable? ### What a Strong Answer Covers Layered limits, appropriate keys, burst handling, distributed-state tradeoffs, clear responses, and monitoring of both attack reduction and legitimate-user impact. ### Follow-up Questions How do you handle clients behind NAT, distributed attacks, expensive endpoints, and an attacker rotating IPs? When would an approximate local limit be preferable to a globally exact counter?

Overview: Design API rate limiting with token buckets, layered identities, endpoint costs, distributed-state tradeoffs, and measurable protection of legitimate traffic.

Read the full Render Software Engineer interview experience this question came from

|Home/System Design/Render
Render logo
Render
Sep 17, 2026
mediumSoftware EngineerTechnical ScreenSystem Design
0
0

After identifying high-volume client addresses in API logs, design rate limiting to protect the API during a denial-of-service incident. Explain the enforcement point, identity, algorithm, and failure behavior.

Constraints & Assumptions

The source asks how to rate limit after a log-analysis task. Request volume alone does not establish abuse, and an IP can represent many legitimate clients. No fixed traffic scale or limit is specified.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

Which endpoints and resources are saturated? Can clients authenticate? Are bursts legitimate? What limits can be enforced at the edge versus inside the service? What should happen if the shared limiter is unavailable?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

Layered limits, appropriate keys, burst handling, distributed-state tradeoffs, clear responses, and monitoring of both attack reduction and legitimate-user impact.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

How do you handle clients behind NAT, distributed attacks, expensive endpoints, and an attacker rotating IPs? When would an approximate local limit be preferable to a globally exact counter?

Submit Your Answer to Earn 20XP

Sign in to leave a comment

Loading comments...