YouTube Long-Range Strategy: Choosing Growth Bets and Sequencing Them Over Five Years

Quick Overview

A product strategy prompt asking a product manager to chart where YouTube should go over the next five years. It tests diagnosing YouTube's position with viewers, creators and advertisers, choosing and sequencing a few strategic bets, and defining how success and risk would be tracked.

YouTube Long-Range Strategy: Choosing Growth Bets and Sequencing Them Over Five Years

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are a product manager at Google, and leadership has asked you to set YouTube's product strategy for the next five years. Explain where YouTube stands today, which direction you would take it, which bets you would make and in what order, and how you would know the strategy is working. ```hint Diagnose before you bet Before naming any initiative, sketch who YouTube serves on each side of its platform and where their attention and money are likely to move over the coming years; let your bets follow from the gaps that sketch reveals. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Does the strategy cover the whole YouTube family (the main app, Shorts, Music, Premium and YouTube TV) or only the core video product? - Is the main objective growth in watch time, in revenue, or in the strength of the creator base, or should I propose the objective myself? - Are bets that need heavy spending on professionally produced or licensed content in scope, or should the plan stay within the creator-uploaded model? - Is this a global strategy, or should it weight particular regions? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A diagnosis of YouTube's current position with viewers, creators and advertisers, including its strengths, weak spots and main competitors - The shifts in viewing, creation and advertising most likely to matter over five years, and why they matter to YouTube - A small set of strategic bets chosen against explicit criteria, with what is deliberately left out and why - A sequence across the five years that shows how early moves enable later ones and draw on YouTube's existing advantages - Success measures with guardrails, plus the biggest risks and how to mitigate them ### Follow-up Questions - If you could fund only one of your bets, which would it be, and what would you stop doing to pay for it? - What would you expect to see by the end of year two that would tell you to change course? - How would your plan keep creators' trust if a bet shifts revenue between formats, or between creators and YouTube?

Overview: A product strategy prompt asking a product manager to chart where YouTube should go over the next five years. It tests diagnosing YouTube's position with viewers, creators and advertisers, choosing and sequencing a few strategic bets, and defining how success and risk would be tracked.

Google logo
Google
Feb 3, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are a product manager at Google, and leadership has asked you to set YouTube's product strategy for the next five years. Explain where YouTube stands today, which direction you would take it, which bets you would make and in what order, and how you would know the strategy is working.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Does the strategy cover the whole YouTube family (the main app, Shorts, Music, Premium and YouTube TV) or only the core video product?
  • Is the main objective growth in watch time, in revenue, or in the strength of the creator base, or should I propose the objective myself?
  • Are bets that need heavy spending on professionally produced or licensed content in scope, or should the plan stay within the creator-uploaded model?
  • Is this a global strategy, or should it weight particular regions?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A diagnosis of YouTube's current position with viewers, creators and advertisers, including its strengths, weak spots and main competitors
  • The shifts in viewing, creation and advertising most likely to matter over five years, and why they matter to YouTube
  • A small set of strategic bets chosen against explicit criteria, with what is deliberately left out and why
  • A sequence across the five years that shows how early moves enable later ones and draw on YouTube's existing advantages
  • Success measures with guardrails, plus the biggest risks and how to mitigate them

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • If you could fund only one of your bets, which would it be, and what would you stop doing to pay for it?
  • What would you expect to see by the end of year two that would tell you to change course?
  • How would your plan keep creators' trust if a bet shifts revenue between formats, or between creators and YouTube?