YouTube Music product improvement: pick a listener segment and prioritize fixes

Quick Overview

A product sense exercise on Google's YouTube Music app: choose a goal and a listener segment, find where the app falls short against the main YouTube app and rival streaming services, and propose a prioritized improvement. It tests user empathy, prioritization, success metrics and awareness of monetization trade-offs.

YouTube Music product improvement: pick a listener segment and prioritize fixes

Company: Google

Role: Product Manager

Category: Product Design & Strategy

Difficulty: medium

Interview Round: Other

You are a product manager at Google working on YouTube Music, the company's standalone music-streaming app. The interviewer asks one open question: how would you improve it? No goal, platform or target listener is given, so choosing them is part of the answer. ```hint Why a second app? The main YouTube app already plays most of the same songs. Work out what job someone hires a dedicated music app for, and where this one lets them down in that job. ``` ### Clarifying Questions - Should the improvement grow listening among people already using the app, convert free listeners to a paid plan, or win people whose main music app is a rival service? - Is the scope the mobile app only, or also desktop, smart speakers, cars and TVs? - Which listeners matter most: people who watch music videos on YouTube but have never opened the music app, free listeners who hear ads, or paying subscribers who get the app through a bundle? - Are pricing and plan changes in scope, or only product features? ### What a Strong Answer Covers - A stated goal and why it matters to Google, given that the main YouTube app already captures a lot of music listening. - One chosen listener segment and the concrete moments where the app fails it, such as listening with the phone locked, search results crowded with many uploads of the same song, or a music library left behind in another app. - Several solution options compared on impact, effort and risk, with one chosen and specified well enough to build. - A north-star metric with guardrails such as paid conversion, ad revenue and total listening across both YouTube apps. - Risks, especially the cost of changing what the free tier includes. ### Follow-up Questions - Leadership proposes letting free listeners keep music playing with the screen off. How would you evaluate the idea and test it without putting subscription revenue at risk? - How would you tell whether your change grew music listening overall or only moved it from the main YouTube app into the music app? - What result two months after launch would make you roll the change back?

Overview: A product sense exercise on Google's YouTube Music app: choose a goal and a listener segment, find where the app falls short against the main YouTube app and rival streaming services, and propose a prioritized improvement. It tests user empathy, prioritization, success metrics and awareness of monetization trade-offs.

Google logo
Google
Oct 30, 2024
mediumProduct ManagerOtherProduct Design & Strategy
0
0

You are a product manager at Google working on YouTube Music, the company's standalone music-streaming app. The interviewer asks one open question: how would you improve it? No goal, platform or target listener is given, so choosing them is part of the answer.

Clarifying Questions Guidance

  • Should the improvement grow listening among people already using the app, convert free listeners to a paid plan, or win people whose main music app is a rival service?
  • Is the scope the mobile app only, or also desktop, smart speakers, cars and TVs?
  • Which listeners matter most: people who watch music videos on YouTube but have never opened the music app, free listeners who hear ads, or paying subscribers who get the app through a bundle?
  • Are pricing and plan changes in scope, or only product features?

What a Strong Answer Covers Guidance

  • A stated goal and why it matters to Google, given that the main YouTube app already captures a lot of music listening.
  • One chosen listener segment and the concrete moments where the app fails it, such as listening with the phone locked, search results crowded with many uploads of the same song, or a music library left behind in another app.
  • Several solution options compared on impact, effort and risk, with one chosen and specified well enough to build.
  • A north-star metric with guardrails such as paid conversion, ad revenue and total listening across both YouTube apps.
  • Risks, especially the cost of changing what the free tier includes.

Follow-up Questions Guidance

  • Leadership proposes letting free listeners keep music playing with the screen off. How would you evaluate the idea and test it without putting subscription revenue at risk?
  • How would you tell whether your change grew music listening overall or only moved it from the main YouTube app into the music app?
  • What result two months after launch would make you roll the change back?