Master your tech interviews with 5000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

Questions
Learning Tracks
Premium
Careers

Community

Join Discord
Instagram
YouTube

Support

support@prachub.com
(916) 541-4762

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions (2025)

Home
/
Topics
/
SQL Data Manipulation Interview Questions
/
SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

HAVING questions test your ability to filter aggregated data, a critical skill that goes beyond basic GROUP BY.

Expect questions combining GROUP BY, aggregates (SUM, COUNT, AVG), and HAVING conditions.

Interviewers evaluate whether you understand the difference between WHERE and HAVING, and proper ordering of clauses.

571Questions

95Companies

Easy 23 • Medium 7 • Hard 0Difficulty mix

Common SQL HAVING interview patterns

Filtering groups with HAVING vs filtering rows with WHERE
HAVING with COUNT, SUM, AVG, and other aggregates
TOP N per group using HAVING with aggregates
Multiple conditions in HAVING clauses
HAVING with complex aggregate expressions
Combining GROUP BY, WHERE, and HAVING in the correct order

SQL HAVING clause interview questions

Filter and sort

Sort

All SQL questions

Determine Growth of Pirated Theme Installations Over Years

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Identify Repeat Advertisers from Consecutive Weeks

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Top Countries' Gmail Usage and MoM Change

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Second-Degree Followers for Each YouTuber

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Retention Metrics Using SQL and Python

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Create OHLC Aggregates from Tick Data in Python

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compute Total Spent in 2023 Excluding Refunds

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate and Compare Survey Response Rates for User Tenure

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Explore Titanic Dataset: Survival Rates, Age, and Correlations

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Derive Insights from DoorDash Order Database

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Late Delivery Percentage and Top Customers

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compare Spark RDDs, DataFrames, and SQL Performance Gains

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Order Spending Patterns Across Cities Using SQL

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Cross-Country Call Data for Recent Trends

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Retrieve Ad Metrics and Rates for Last 7 Days

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Seller Activity and Vehicle Listing Interactions

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze User and Merchant Behavior with Order Data

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compare Spark RDDs, DataFrames, and Spark SQL Benefits

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Customer Purchase Patterns Using SQL Query

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Conversion Rate from Ad Clicks to Page Visits

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

PreviousPage 27 of 29Next

Common mistakes with HAVING

Using WHERE instead of HAVING to filter aggregates
Incorrect clause ordering (HAVING before GROUP BY)
Aggregating already-aggregated values in HAVING
Confusion between row-level filters (WHERE) and group-level filters (HAVING)
Not considering NULL values in aggregate conditions

How HAVING questions are evaluated in interviews

Understanding the execution order of clauses is key.

Explain why WHERE filters rows but HAVING filters groups.

Demonstrate correct aggregate function usage in filtering contexts.

Related SQL concepts

SQL aggregation interview questions
SQL JOIN interview questions
SQL window function interview questions
SQL CASE WHEN interview questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview FAQs

What is the difference between WHERE and HAVING?

WHERE filters individual rows before aggregation occurs. HAVING filters groups after aggregation. You use WHERE to exclude rows from being aggregated, and HAVING to exclude groups from the final result.

Can you use HAVING without GROUP BY?

Some databases allow it, treating the entire result set as one group. However, this is generally considered non-standard and not recommended. Always pair HAVING with GROUP BY for clarity and portability.