Master your tech interviews with 5000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

Questions
Learning Tracks
Premium
Careers

Community

Join Discord
Instagram
YouTube

Support

support@prachub.com
(916) 541-4762

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions (2025)

Home
/
Topics
/
SQL Data Manipulation Interview Questions
/
SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

HAVING questions test your ability to filter aggregated data, a critical skill that goes beyond basic GROUP BY.

Expect questions combining GROUP BY, aggregates (SUM, COUNT, AVG), and HAVING conditions.

Interviewers evaluate whether you understand the difference between WHERE and HAVING, and proper ordering of clauses.

571Questions

95Companies

Easy 23 • Medium 7 • Hard 0Difficulty mix

Common SQL HAVING interview patterns

Filtering groups with HAVING vs filtering rows with WHERE
HAVING with COUNT, SUM, AVG, and other aggregates
TOP N per group using HAVING with aggregates
Multiple conditions in HAVING clauses
HAVING with complex aggregate expressions
Combining GROUP BY, WHERE, and HAVING in the correct order

SQL HAVING clause interview questions

Filter and sort

Sort

All SQL questions

Compute invalid event percentage by pixel

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Return top-3 content per category

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Recommend two-hop follows in Python

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compute cumulative metrics with full joins

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Answer SQL MCQs with reasoning

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Write SQL for Transactions and Customers

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Implement pagination and clump grouping

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Write SQL for active follow connections

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Machine Learning Engineer

Train and analyze a classifier

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Pivot data without date libraries

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Compute delivery metrics and top-K queries

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compare WHERE vs HAVING with aggregates

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Machine Learning Engineer

Implement simulation-based portfolio optimizer in Python

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Write conditional aggregates with CASE WHEN

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Machine Learning Engineer

Process CSV for portfolio returns and metrics

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Find posts with >60s unconnected viewing time

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Create SQL report of top extensions by weekday

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Compute unique visitors by department

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Software Engineer

Count IoT devices matching date and threshold

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Write SQL for rolling default rates

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

PreviousPage 28 of 29Next

Common mistakes with HAVING

Using WHERE instead of HAVING to filter aggregates
Incorrect clause ordering (HAVING before GROUP BY)
Aggregating already-aggregated values in HAVING
Confusion between row-level filters (WHERE) and group-level filters (HAVING)
Not considering NULL values in aggregate conditions

How HAVING questions are evaluated in interviews

Understanding the execution order of clauses is key.

Explain why WHERE filters rows but HAVING filters groups.

Demonstrate correct aggregate function usage in filtering contexts.

Related SQL concepts

SQL aggregation interview questions
SQL JOIN interview questions
SQL window function interview questions
SQL CASE WHEN interview questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview FAQs

What is the difference between WHERE and HAVING?

WHERE filters individual rows before aggregation occurs. HAVING filters groups after aggregation. You use WHERE to exclude rows from being aggregated, and HAVING to exclude groups from the final result.

Can you use HAVING without GROUP BY?

Some databases allow it, treating the entire result set as one group. However, this is generally considered non-standard and not recommended. Always pair HAVING with GROUP BY for clarity and portability.