Master your tech interviews with 5000+ real questions from top companies.

Product

Questions
Learning Tracks
Premium
Careers

Community

Join Discord
Instagram
YouTube

Support

support@prachub.com
(916) 541-4762

© 2026 PracHub. All rights reserved.

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions (2025)

Home
/
Topics
/
SQL Data Manipulation Interview Questions
/
SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview Questions

HAVING questions test your ability to filter aggregated data, a critical skill that goes beyond basic GROUP BY.

Expect questions combining GROUP BY, aggregates (SUM, COUNT, AVG), and HAVING conditions.

Interviewers evaluate whether you understand the difference between WHERE and HAVING, and proper ordering of clauses.

571Questions

95Companies

Easy 23 • Medium 7 • Hard 0Difficulty mix

Common SQL HAVING interview patterns

Filtering groups with HAVING vs filtering rows with WHERE
HAVING with COUNT, SUM, AVG, and other aggregates
TOP N per group using HAVING with aggregates
Multiple conditions in HAVING clauses
HAVING with complex aggregate expressions
Combining GROUP BY, WHERE, and HAVING in the correct order

SQL HAVING clause interview questions

Filter and sort

Sort

All SQL questions

Identify and Flag Bot Traffic in Online Forum

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Identify Date with Highest Total kWh Consumption Using Pandas

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Streaming Data with SQL for Monthly Trends

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Weekly Thread Engagement with Reactions in SQL

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Analyze Monthly Prime vs Non-Prime Sales and Price Buckets

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Create Country-Level Spend Report Using Pandas

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Identify SQL Joins and Correct Query Errors

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Aggregate User Activity, Fit Regression, Interpret Coefficients

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Determine Top Advertisers by Conversion Rate and CTR Analysis

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Determine Old vs. New Users' Shop Visibility Changes

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Implement Left Join Using Python Dictionaries Efficiently

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Week-over-Week Revenue Change Using SQL

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compute Customer Spend and Engineer Features for 2023

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compute User Retention and Analyze Event Data

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Calculate Survey Response Rate and Quality Metric in SQL

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Design SQL Query for Shop Visibility and User Activity Metrics

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Implement Binary Search for Policy Violation Logs

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Generate Friendship List with Acceptance Dates Using Pandas

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Sample and Simulate Price Adjustments in R with dplyr

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

Compute 3-Day Rolling Revenue Averages with Pandas

Data Manipulation (SQL/Python)

PreviousPage 3 of 29Next

Common mistakes with HAVING

Using WHERE instead of HAVING to filter aggregates
Incorrect clause ordering (HAVING before GROUP BY)
Aggregating already-aggregated values in HAVING
Confusion between row-level filters (WHERE) and group-level filters (HAVING)
Not considering NULL values in aggregate conditions

How HAVING questions are evaluated in interviews

Understanding the execution order of clauses is key.

Explain why WHERE filters rows but HAVING filters groups.

Demonstrate correct aggregate function usage in filtering contexts.

Related SQL concepts

SQL aggregation interview questions
SQL JOIN interview questions
SQL window function interview questions
SQL CASE WHEN interview questions

SQL HAVING Clause Interview FAQs

What is the difference between WHERE and HAVING?

WHERE filters individual rows before aggregation occurs. HAVING filters groups after aggregation. You use WHERE to exclude rows from being aggregated, and HAVING to exclude groups from the final result.

Can you use HAVING without GROUP BY?

Some databases allow it, treating the entire result set as one group. However, this is generally considered non-standard and not recommended. Always pair HAVING with GROUP BY for clarity and portability.