The role of Software Engineer at Core BTS is pivotal to our mission of delivering innovative technology solutions that empower businesses across various sectors. As a Software Engineer, you will contribute to the design, development, and implementation of software applications that enhance operational efficiency and drive business value. This role requires a blend of technical expertise, problem-solving skills, and a keen understanding of user needs, making it both challenging and rewarding. Your contributions as a Software Engineer directly impact our products and services, ensuring they are robust, user-friendly, and aligned with industry standards. You will work collaboratively within cross-functional teams, addressing complex technical challenges while focusing on scalability and performance. Engaging with diverse problem spaces—ranging from cloud solutions to system integrations—this position offers a unique opportunity to influence the strategic direction of our technology initiatives.
Initial Screening
reportedFirst contact with a recruiter to assess candidate qualifications and fit.
What to demonstrate
- First contact with a recruiter to assess candidate qualifications and fit
- Depth in Observability / Application Performance Monitoring
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Team Interviews
reportedOne or two rounds of interviews with team leaders or senior engineers, including technical assessments.
What to demonstrate
- One or two rounds of interviews with team leaders or senior engineers
- Including technical assessments
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Describe your experience with version control systems.
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you ensure code quality and maintainability?
Behavioral Questions
reportedInterviews will include behavioral questions to evaluate cultural fit within the team.
What to demonstrate
- Interviews will include behavioral questions to evaluate cultural fit within the team
- Depth in Observability / Application Performance Monitoring
How to prepare
- Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
- Re-read the description of the behavioral questions above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Prepare Examples
Be ready to share specific examples of your work. Use the STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) method to structure your responses.
Ask Questions
Show your interest in the role and the company by asking insightful questions about team dynamics, project priorities, and company culture.
Be Yourself
Authenticity is valued at Core BTS. Be genuine in your responses, as cultural fit is as important as technical skills.
Remember that interviews are a two-way street
Use this opportunity to assess if Core BTS aligns with your career goals and values.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Write a function that reverses a string.
Write a function that reverses a string.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Explain the time complexity of your solution to a particular algorithm problem.
Explain the time complexity of your solution to a particular algorithm problem.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Describe how you would implement a search algorithm for a large dataset.
Describe how you would implement a search algorithm for a large dataset.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Hold a per-tenant active cap against concurrent creates
A tenant on the standard plan may hold at most 50 resources with status='active'. The create handler runs SELECT count(*) FROM resource WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND status = 'active', compares to 50, then inserts. Two creates arrive 3 ms apart on different instances and the tenant lands at 51. Name the anomaly, say whether PostgreSQL 16 READ COMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ prevents it and why, then give an implementation that holds the cap at READ COMMITTED with the exact statements. Finally, say what changes when the cap is 'at most one running export per tenant' on job_run.
Approach
- Name it: write skew. The two transactions read an overlapping set and write disjoint rows, so there is no row-level conflict for the engine to detect and each commit is individually legal.
- Rule out the levels precisely. READ COMMITTED takes a fresh snapshot per statement and takes no lock on the counted rows, so both see 49. PostgreSQL's REPEATABLE READ is snapshot isolation: it removes non-repeatable reads and phantoms within the snapshot but still admits write skew, because the anomaly is not a re-read of a changed row, it is a read of a set that a concurrent transaction invalidates. Only SERIALIZABLE closes it, by tracking the read dependency and aborting one transaction with SQLSTATE 40001 — a guarantee that exists only if the application re-runs the whole transaction from the read.
- Convert the set predicate into a single-row conflict: keep tenant.active_resource_count and run UPDATE tenant SET active_resource_count = active_resource_count + 1 WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND active_resource_count < 50 in the same transaction as the INSERT. Zero affected rows is the cap, returned as 409. The row lock serialises the decision at any isolation level, and contention is bounded to one tenant's row — which is also the fair-scheduling unit, unlike a global counter that would convoy every tenant behind one row.
- State the cost you just took on: a counter is a second source of truth that can drift, so every path that changes status must adjust it inside the same transaction, and a periodic reconciliation has to exist, with resource_revision as the authority for what the count should have been.
Follow-up
- A resource moves from archived back to active. Which statements change, and what breaks if the counter update and the status change land in different transactions?
- The cap becomes plan-dependent and a plan can change mid-month. Where does the number 50 live, and who reads it?
Stop tag and share joins from fanning out a page
resource_tag is (resource_id, tag_id) with PK (resource_id, tag_id); resource_share is (resource_id, shared_with_user_id, permission). The tagged-and-shared listing inner-joins resource to both, filters tenant_id, tag_id = ANY($2) and shared_with_user_id = $3, orders by updated_at DESC and takes 50. Pages come back with fewer than 50 distinct resources and the total in the header is far too high. Explain the row multiplication, rewrite both the page query and the count query so each is correct, and name the index each one needs. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Do the arithmetic against the predicates that are actually there. An inner join emits one row per matching child row, and both joins are filtered: tag_id = ANY($2) admits only the requested tags, shared_with_user_id = $3 admits one user's share rows. So a resource holding three of the requested tags and shared with $3 once yields three rows, not one — the multiplier is its count of matching tags times its share rows for that single user, and that second factor is 1 unless the table admits duplicate (resource_id, shared_with_user_id) pairs. LIMIT 50 then limits rows rather than resources, and COUNT(*) counts pairs — the header is the product, not the population.
- Reject DISTINCT as the fix. It deduplicates after the product has been built, so the planner must materialise and sort the fanned-out set before the LIMIT can apply, and it leaves any SUM or AVG in the same select list wrong.
- Rewrite both filters as semi-joins, keeping resource as the only row source: AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM resource_tag rt WHERE rt.resource_id = r.resource_id AND rt.tag_id = ANY($2)) and the same shape against resource_share. A semi-join stops at the first match per resource and preserves the driving index order, so ORDER BY updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC LIMIT 50 still stops after 50 rows.
- Count with the same predicates and no join at all: SELECT count(*) FROM resource r WHERE r.tenant_id = $1 AND r.status = 'active' AND EXISTS (...) AND EXISTS (...). Nothing multiplies a resource, so the number is the population.
Follow-up
- The filter changes from 'any of these tags' to 'all of these tags'. Rewrite it and state what it costs relative to the ANY form.
- A resource can be shared with the same user twice under different permissions. Does your count change, and should it?
What design patterns do you frequently use, and why?
What design patterns do you frequently use, and why?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How do you ensure code quality and maintainability?
How do you ensure code quality and maintainability?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Can you discuss a recent project where you applied agile methodologies?
Can you discuss a recent project where you applied agile methodologies?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
What steps would you take to optimize a slow-running application?
What steps would you take to optimize a slow-running application?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
If given a set of requirements, how would you estimate the time needed to complete the project?
If given a set of requirements, how would you estimate the time needed to complete the project?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Explain the process you follow to troubleshoot application errors.
Explain the process you follow to troubleshoot application errors.
Approach
- Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
- Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
- Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
- Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.
Follow-up
- What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
- How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?
Built from the rounds and topics Core BTS candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the Core BTS loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Team Interviews, Behavioral Questions.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 3 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Observability / Application Performance Monitoring
- Spend the session on Observability / Application Performance Monitoring, which Core BTS candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Observability / Application Performance Monitoring and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Observability / Application Performance Monitoring.
03Work Troubleshooting (Server Access)
- Spend the session on Troubleshooting (Server Access), which Core BTS candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Troubleshooting (Server Access) and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Troubleshooting (Server Access).
04Work Infrastructure Engineering
- Spend the session on Infrastructure Engineering, which Core BTS candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Infrastructure Engineering and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Infrastructure Engineering.
05Answer out loud: Technical / Domain Questions
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the process you follow to troubleshoot application errors.
- Answer aloud, timed: What design patterns do you frequently use, and why?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical / Domain Questions question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Behavioral / Leadership
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time when you faced a significant obstacle in a project. How did you overcome it?
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle conflicts within a team?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral / Leadership question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Problem-Solving / Case Studies
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach designing a new feature for an existing application?
- Answer aloud, timed: Discuss a time when you turned a vague requirement into a clear technical solution.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Problem-Solving / Case Studies question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
Describe your experience with version control systems.
Describe your experience with version control systems.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Describe a time when you faced a significant obstacle in a project. How did you overcome it?
Describe a time when you faced a significant obstacle in a project. How did you overcome it?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
How do you handle conflicts within a team?
How do you handle conflicts within a team?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Can you provide an example of how you have mentored a colleague?
Can you provide an example of how you have mentored a colleague?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
What motivates you to deliver high-quality work?
What motivates you to deliver high-quality work?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
How do you prioritize tasks when working on multiple projects?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Discuss a time when you turned a vague requirement into a clear technical solution.
Discuss a time when you turned a vague requirement into a clear technical solution.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
Describe your experience with version control systems.
- 02
Describe a time when you faced a significant obstacle in a project. How did you overcome it?
- 03
How do you handle conflicts within a team?
- 04
Can you provide an example of how you have mentored a colleague?
What is the typical difficulty level of the interviews?
The difficulty can vary by team, but candidates generally report a mix of technical and behavioral questions. Adequate preparation will help you feel confident and capable during the interviews.
Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How long does the interview process usually take?
From initial contact to offer, the process typically takes a few weeks. However, the timeline can vary depending on the availability of interviewers and candidates.
Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What differentiates successful candidates at Core BTS?
Successful candidates often demonstrate a strong technical foundation, effective problem-solving skills, and a genuine enthusiasm for collaboration and learning.
Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Is remote work an option for this role?
While some positions allow for remote work, others may require on-site presence. It's best to confirm the expectations during your initial discussions with the recruiter.
Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does Core BTS test in interviews?
Core BTS interviews most often cover Stakeholder Management, Requirements Gathering, Data Engineering, ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), and Systems Engineering. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01Core BTS Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
Vercel Software Engineer Interview Guide
Debugging practice for Vercel software engineer prep built on a reproduction you trust, narrowing to the smallest failing input, and changing one variable per run so the result stays attributable.
Together Ai Software Engineer Interview Guide
Failure-handling practice for Together Ai software engineer candidates: requests whose outcome a timeout leaves unknown, where a retry is safe, and deduplicating at the receiver instead of assuming exactly-once delivery.
Lambda Software Engineer Interview Guide
Failure-handling practice for Lambda software engineer candidates: requests whose outcome a timeout leaves unknown, where a retry is safe, and deduplicating at the receiver instead of assuming exactly-once delivery.
CoreWeave Software Engineer Interview Guide
Failure-handling practice for CoreWeave software engineer candidates: requests whose outcome a timeout leaves unknown, where a retry is safe, and deduplicating at the receiver instead of assuming exactly-once delivery.