The Software Engineer role at DataVisor is at the heart of our mission to combat sophisticated global fraud. As a member of our engineering team, you will build and scale high-performance systems capable of processing massive datasets in real-time. Your work directly impacts our ability to detect fraudulent activity patterns, protecting our clients and their users through advanced machine learning and data infrastructure. This position demands more than just coding proficiency; it requires a deep interest in large-scale distributed systems and algorithmic efficiency. You will collaborate with product managers, data scientists, and fellow engineers to translate complex fraud-detection challenges into robust, production-ready software. It is a high-impact role where your contributions are visible, measurable, and essential to maintaining the integrity of our platform. ##### Tip DataVisor moves at a rapid pace. Candidates who demonstrate both technical depth and a proactive, problem-solving mindset tend to thrive in our environment.
Technical Phone Screen
reportedInitial screening call focusing on technical skills and problem-solving abilities.
What to demonstrate
- Initial screening call focusing on technical skills and problem-solving abilities
- Depth in Algorithms (general)
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Onsite/Virtual Interviews
reportedMultiple rounds of interviews that include coding challenges and discussions about past projects.
What to demonstrate
- Multiple rounds of interviews that include coding challenges and discussions about past projects
- Depth in Algorithms (general)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Solve for the shortest path in a graph representing user connections.
- Answer aloud and timed: Write a function to perform string manipulation for log parsing.
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Think out loud
Never code in silence. Your interviewer needs to understand your thought process to evaluate your problem-solving approach.
Ask clarifying questions
Before jumping into code, ensure you fully understand the constraints and edge cases of the problem.
Prepare your stories
Use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to frame your responses to behavioral questions.
Know your resume
Be prepared to dive deep into any project you have listed; interviewers will often ask for specific details about the challenges you faced and the trade-offs you made.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Implement an efficient algorithm to detect patterns in a large stream of JSON data.
Implement an efficient algorithm to detect patterns in a large stream of JSON data.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Solve for the shortest path in a graph representing user connections.
Solve for the shortest path in a graph representing user connections.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Write a function to perform string manipulation for log parsing.
Write a function to perform string manipulation for log parsing.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Optimize a brute-force search algorithm to meet low-latency requirements.
Optimize a brute-force search algorithm to meet low-latency requirements.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
How do you manage concurrency and multithreading in Java-based applications?
How do you manage concurrency and multithreading in Java-based applications?
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
Find version gaps and relay lag with window functions
outbox_event holds event_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status ('pending','published','dead'), attempts, created_at, published_at. A projection is missing rows and you must decide whether the relay skipped events or the consumer dropped them. Write three queries over the last seven days: one listing every aggregate_id whose published aggregate_version sequence has a hole, one giving per-day counts with a running total, and one returning the newest published event per aggregate. For each, say where the window function is evaluated relative to WHERE and LIMIT. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Gaps: compute lead(aggregate_version) OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version) in a subquery, then filter next_version <> aggregate_version + 1 in the outer query. Window functions are evaluated after WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING and before the outer ORDER BY and LIMIT, so the predicate cannot sit in the same WHERE clause and PostgreSQL 16 has no QUALIFY.
- Say what the seven-day filter does to the answer: it truncates every partition, so the first row per aggregate has no predecessor inside the window and a hole spanning the boundary is invisible. Widen the window, or join to resource.version as the authority for the true maximum.
- Running total: SELECT date_trunc('day', created_at) AS d, count() AS n, sum(count()) OVER (ORDER BY date_trunc('day', created_at) ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING). An aggregate inside a window call is legal because grouping runs before windowing. The grouping key is unique per row here so ROWS and RANGE agree, but write the frame anyway — over ungrouped rows with tied timestamps the default RANGE frame pulls in every peer row and the total jumps.
- Newest per aggregate: DISTINCT ON (aggregate_id) ... ORDER BY aggregate_id, aggregate_version DESC is the cheap PostgreSQL-only form when an index matches that order; row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version DESC) = 1 is the portable form and needs a subquery for the same evaluation-order reason as the gap query.
Follow-up
- Relay failover redelivers events. Does a duplicate break the gap query, and how would you detect one from this table alone?
- Turn the gap check into a continuous monitor rather than a query someone runs after an incident. What does it watch?
Replace offset paging on the resource feed with keyset
resource holds resource_id, tenant_id, owner_user_id, title, body_ref, version, status ('draft','active','archived','deleted'), created_at, updated_at, deleted_at, with an index on (tenant_id, status, updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC). The listing endpoint returns active resources for one tenant, newest update first, 50 per page, today with LIMIT 50 OFFSET n. Tenants reach page 400 and rows are created while they read. Write the keyset query, define what the cursor carries and how it is encoded, and say which part of the index each predicate uses. Assume PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Name the two failures separately. OFFSET 20000 makes the server produce and discard 20,000 rows, so page cost grows with depth rather than with page size. Independently, any write that changes how many rows sort above the offset moves the window between two fetches, and the direction decides which anomaly you get: an insert lands at the head of updated_at DESC and pushes already-returned rows down past the boundary, so they are returned a second time; a delete above the offset, or a row whose updated_at is bumped above the cursor, pulls rows up and one is never returned at all. Nothing in the response reveals either.
- Write the seek: WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND status = 'active' AND (updated_at, resource_id) < ($2, $3) ORDER BY updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC LIMIT 50. The row-value comparison is one index range rather than a disjunction, and both columns are NOT NULL, which is what makes that comparison well defined.
- Map each predicate onto the index: tenant_id and status are equality on the leading columns, (updated_at, resource_id) is the range, and the ORDER BY matches the index order so no Sort node appears and the scan stops after 50 rows. The DESC in the definition only matters for mixed directions — a plain ascending btree on the same columns is read backwards for this query.
- Put both sort columns in the cursor and nothing the client can tamper with into another tenant: base64 of (updated_at, resource_id), validated server-side, with tenant_id taken from the principal.
Follow-up
- The client asks for 'jump to page 400'. What do you offer instead, and what does the honest version cost?
- Sort order becomes user-selectable across four columns. How many indexes is that, and which would you refuse to add?
Given a list of user events, how would you design a function to identify anomalies?
Given a list of user events, how would you design a function to identify anomalies?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Explain the role of Kafka in a real-time data processing pipeline.
Explain the role of Kafka in a real-time data processing pipeline.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
What are the advantages of using Redis for caching in a high-traffic environment?
What are the advantages of using Redis for caching in a high-traffic environment?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Describe the challenges of scaling a database under heavy write loads.
Describe the challenges of scaling a database under heavy write loads.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How does Spring Boot facilitate the development of microservices at scale?
How does Spring Boot facilitate the development of microservices at scale?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Every query on one table stalls for forty seconds mid-deploy
During a release on PostgreSQL, every query touching resource times out for about 40 seconds and then recovers with no intervention. The release ran one migration, ALTER TABLE resource ADD COLUMN archived_reason TEXT, and the migration log shows it completing in 6 ms. Unrelated tables showed no change in error rate. Explain how a 6 ms statement caused a 40-second stall, give the ordered checks you would run on a live system to confirm it, and give the migration procedure that prevents a repeat.
Approach
- Separate the statement's duration from the lock's duration. ADD COLUMN with no default is a catalogue-only change and genuinely runs in milliseconds, but it requires ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, and it cannot acquire that until every transaction already touching the table has finished.
- Account for the queueing, which is the part that surprises people. A lock request that is waiting blocks later requests for conflicting modes behind it rather than letting them overtake, so one long-open transaction holds the DDL and the DDL holds all the traffic. The stall length is set by the longest open transaction, not by the size of the change.
- Confirm on a live system in this order: pg_stat_activity for that table ordered by xact_start, looking for the oldest transaction and specifically for state = idle in transaction; then pg_locks where granted = false to find the waiter; then join them on pid to name blocker and blocked. pg_blocking_pids() does that join for you and is the fastest single call.
- Prevent rather than merely time it better. Set lock_timeout to a second or two on the migration session so the DDL abandons the queue after a bounded wait and is retried, instead of holding it for as long as the oldest transaction lives. Be exact about what that buys: queries arriving during the wait still queue behind the pending ACCESS EXCLUSIVE request, so each attempt costs them up to one lock_timeout of added latency. The outage goes from 40 seconds to about one second per attempt, not to zero. Also run migrations away from deploy-time peaks, and put a statement timeout and an idle-in-transaction timeout on the analytics role that opens the long transactions.
Follow-up
- The same release also wants NOT NULL on that column. What is the sequence that gets there without a long lock?
- Your lock_timeout retry fails ten times in a row because the analytics transaction is always open. What do you change?
Built from the rounds and topics DataVisor candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the DataVisor loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Technical Phone Screen, Onsite/Virtual Interviews.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 2 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Algorithms (general)
- Spend the session on Algorithms (general), which DataVisor candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Algorithms (general) and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Algorithms (general).
03Work Data Structures (general)
- Spend the session on Data Structures (general), which DataVisor candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Data Structures (general) and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Data Structures (general).
04Work Graph Algorithms
- Spend the session on Graph Algorithms, which DataVisor candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Graph Algorithms and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Graph Algorithms.
05Answer out loud: Coding and Algorithms
- Answer aloud, timed: Implement an efficient algorithm to detect patterns in a large stream of JSON data.
- Answer aloud, timed: Given a list of user events, how would you design a function to identify anomalies?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Coding and Algorithms question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Technical Domain Knowledge
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the role of Kafka in a real-time data processing pipeline.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you manage concurrency and multithreading in Java-based applications?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical Domain Knowledge question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Behavioral and Problem-Solving
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time you had to optimize a piece of code that was causing performance bottlenecks.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle ambiguity when a requirement is not clearly defined?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral and Problem-Solving question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
Describe a time you had to optimize a piece of code that was causing performance bottlenecks.
Describe a time you had to optimize a piece of code that was causing performance bottlenecks.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
How do you handle ambiguity when a requirement is not clearly defined?
How do you handle ambiguity when a requirement is not clearly defined?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Tell us about a technical disagreement you had with a teammate and how you resolved it.
Tell us about a technical disagreement you had with a teammate and how you resolved it.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Why do you want to apply your engineering skills to the fraud detection domain?
Why do you want to apply your engineering skills to the fraud detection domain?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
Describe a time you had to optimize a piece of code that was causing performance bottlenecks.
- 02
How do you handle ambiguity when a requirement is not clearly defined?
- 03
Tell us about a technical disagreement you had with a teammate and how you resolved it.
- 04
Why do you want to apply your engineering skills to the fraud detection domain?
How long does the entire process usually take?
The timeline varies, but generally, the process moves relatively quickly once you pass the initial screens. Be prepared for back-to-back rounds during the final stage.
DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Are the coding questions always language-specific?
While we often use Java, we are more interested in your problem-solving logic. You will generally be allowed to use the language you are most comfortable with, provided you can explain your implementation.
DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the culture like at DataVisor?
We are a fast-paced, high-output team. We value engineers who are self-starters, take ownership of their work, and are comfortable working in a high-stakes environment where precision matters.
DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Should I focus on LeetCode or system design?
Focus on both. You will face algorithmic challenges in nearly every round, but senior-level roles will also place significant weight on your ability to design and scale systems.
DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does DataVisor test in interviews?
DataVisor interviews most often cover Python, Feature Engineering, QA Engineering (General), Algorithms (general), and Security Engineering. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01DataVisor Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
Zebra Technologies Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Zebra Technologies asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Waters Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Waters asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
W.W. Grainger Software Engineer Interview Guide
What W.W. Grainger asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Virtusa Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Virtusa asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.