Havis · Software Engineer
Updated · 2026-10-02

Havis Software Engineer
Interview Guide

THE 60-SECOND BRIEF

At Havis, the role of an engineer—whether focused on project, field service, or software-integrated systems—is fundamental to our mission of enhancing safety and productivity through mobility solutions. You will work at the intersection of complex hardware and software, ensuring that our technology performs reliably in the high-stakes environments our customers serve, such as Public Safety, Military Defense, and Healthcare. Your impact will be felt across the entire product life cycle. From diagnosing intricate system failures to defining integration requirements for firmware and drivers, you are the technical bridge between our innovative designs and the real-world performance our clients demand.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at Havis.

Havis candidates report 4 rounds over 3-5 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

TroubleshootingElectrical/Electronic SystemsRoot Cause Analysis (RCA)

20 min read

Browse Software Engineer questions

See the practice prompts

15Practice promptsAcross five skill areas

At Havis, the role of an engineer—whether focused on project, field service, or software-integrated systems—is fundamental to our mission of enhancing safety and productivity through mobility solutions. You will work at the intersection of complex hardware and software, ensuring that our technology performs reliably in the high-stakes environments our customers serve, such as Public Safety, Military Defense, and Healthcare. Your impact will be felt across the entire product life cycle. From diagnosing intricate system failures to defining integration requirements for firmware and drivers, you are the technical bridge between our innovative designs and the real-world performance our clients demand. This role is for those who thrive on technical rigor, enjoy solving complex, multi-disciplinary problems, and take pride in creating clear, actionable documentation that keeps our systems running at peak efficiency.

01

Application Review

reported

Initial evaluation of credentials to assess fit for the role.

What to demonstrate

  • Initial evaluation of credentials to assess fit for the role
  • Depth in Troubleshooting

How to prepare

  • Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
  • Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
02

Standardized Testing

reported

Candidates may undergo logic and competency exams to evaluate skills.

What to demonstrate

  • Candidates may undergo logic and competency exams to evaluate skills
  • Depth in Troubleshooting

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you approach the integration of software and firmware with hardware components?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Describe your process for diagnosing a complex system failure.
Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
03

Face-to-Face Interactions

reported

In-person or virtual meetings with departmental leads to discuss technical capabilities.

What to demonstrate

  • In-person or virtual meetings with departmental leads to discuss technical capabilities
  • Depth in Troubleshooting

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you ensure compatibility across different computing platforms and power management systems?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.
Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
04

Technical Assessments

reported

In-depth evaluations of technical skills relevant to the product ecosystem.

What to demonstrate

  • In-depth evaluations of technical skills relevant to the product ecosystem
  • Depth in Troubleshooting

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple customer-reported issues simultaneously?
  • Answer aloud and timed: Describe a situation where you identified a product limitation or non-conformance; how did you communicate this to your team?
Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗

PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.

01

Own your resume

Be prepared to speak to every line item on your CV. If you list a project, be ready to explain the "why" and "how" behind your technical choices.

02

Be ready for role-playing

If asked to participate in a role-playing exercise, treat it as a real-world scenario. Focus on being professional, clear, and service-oriented.

03

Understand the industry

Familiarize yourself with the sectors we serve, such as Public Safety and Logistics, as your work will directly impact these industries.

04

Ask meaningful questions

Use the end of your interview to ask about the team’s current challenges or the product lifecycle; this shows you are already thinking like a member of the team.

Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.

11 technical prompts0 include a worked solution

Find overlapping job attempts and peak concurrency from lease records

medium
sweep lineintervalsleases

A day of job_run history yields about 50,000,000 attempt records: (job_run_id, job_type, attempt, started_at, finished_at which is NULL when the worker died, lease_expires_at). Leases expire on a clock, so a job that outran its lease ran twice. Produce (a) every job_run_id whose attempts overlapped in wall-clock time and (b) the peak number of simultaneously running attempts per job_type with the minute it occurred. Target O(n log n). State how you treat a NULL finished_at and what clock skew does to your answer.

Approach
  1. Define the interval before sorting anything: an attempt occupies [started_at, COALESCE(finished_at, lease_expires_at)). finished_at is observed and lease_expires_at is only a promise, so every attempt without a finish contributes an estimate and the whole result is a lower bound on overlap rather than an exact count.
  2. For peak concurrency, sweep: emit 2n endpoints, sort by (timestamp, kind) with ends ordered before starts at equal timestamps, then walk the sequence maintaining a counter per job_type and record each type's maximum with its timestamp. O(n log n) dominated by the sort, O(n) space, or O(1) extra if the sort is external and the walk streams.
  3. For overlap detection, do not compare attempts pairwise. A single global sort by (job_run_id, started_at) gives both the grouping and the order; within a group, keep the maximum end seen so far and report an overlap exactly when the next start is less than that running maximum, which is one linear pass after the sort.
  4. Half-open intervals matter and are easy to get wrong: with closed intervals an attempt ending at the same millisecond another begins reads as concurrency two, and across 50,000,000 records that artefact swamps the real signal.
Follow-up
  • A handler is not idempotent and you have found 400 overlapping jobs. Which of them actually caused damage, and what would you query to find out?
  • Peak concurrency for one job_type is 4 against a configured cap of 4. Is the cap working, or is the data hiding attempts that never started?

Track a rolling failure rate per destination for circuit decisions

easy
sliding windowring buffercircuit breaker

The egress service delivers about 1,500 webhooks per second across roughly 40,000 destinations, each call bounded by a 10 second timeout. Maintain, per destination, the failure rate over the trailing 60 seconds so a caller can ask before dispatch whether the circuit should open. Attempts arrive as (destination_id, finished_at_ms, outcome). Requirement: amortised O(1) per attempt, with total memory bounded by the destination count rather than by traffic. Give the structure, its exact memory, and the rule that stops a destination with three attempts from opening a circuit.

Approach
  1. Name the exact-deque version and then reject it as the default. Holding timestamps and advancing a tail pointer past anything older than now minus 60 seconds is a correct two-pointer window at amortised O(1) per attempt, but its memory tracks in-window traffic, so one destination in a retry storm holds hundreds of thousands of entries while thousands of quiet destinations hold none.
  2. Use a ring of 60 one-second buckets per destination, each bucket a pair of counters for attempts and failures. On an attempt, advance the ring by the elapsed whole seconds, zeroing at most min(elapsed, 60) buckets, then increment the head. That is amortised O(1) with a fixed footprint per destination.
  3. State the footprint: 60 buckets times two 4-byte counters is 480 bytes of payload per destination, so 40,000 destinations is roughly 20 to 25 MB with per-entry overhead, bounded by the catalogue rather than by the rate. The cost is granularity, since the oldest bucket ages out in whole seconds, which is far tighter than the decision needs.
  4. Require a minimum sample before the circuit may open. A destination with three attempts and three failures reads as 100 percent and is not evidence; a floor of roughly 20 attempts in the window makes the ratio meaningful, and below that floor use a run of consecutive failures as the trigger instead.
Follow-up
  • The fleet is 30 instances and each sees roughly a thirtieth of a destination's traffic. Where does the rate actually live, and what does a per-instance answer get wrong?
  • A destination answers in 9.5 seconds and succeeds. It is not failing but it is consuming your per-destination concurrency. What signal should open the circuit here?

Merge partitioned event streams into one ordered feed with bounded lateness

hard
k-way mergewatermarksout-of-order streams

The read-model service consumes 64 log partitions carrying about 4,000 events per second in total. Each partition is ordered within itself, but partitions drift by up to 30 seconds, and the activity feed must present a tenant's events in occurred_at order. Produce the merge. State its complexity, the buffer it requires in events and in bytes, what happens when one partition is idle, and what you do with an event that arrives after you have already emitted its position. Payloads average 1 KB.

Approach
  1. Merge with a min-heap over the 64 partition heads keyed on (occurred_at, event_id): O(log P) per event and O(n log P) overall. The tie-break on event_id is what makes the output deterministic when two partitions carry the same millisecond, which matters because the feed is paginated and a non-deterministic order reorders pages under the reader.
  2. Emitting the heap head is only correct once every partition has produced everything up to that timestamp, so the emit condition is a watermark: the minimum across partitions of the highest occurred_at seen, less the allowed lateness. Events are held until the watermark passes them, which is what turns individually ordered streams into a jointly ordered one.
  3. Size the buffer from the lateness rather than guessing: 4,000 events per second times 30 seconds is 120,000 buffered events, and at 1 KB each about 120 MB of heap. That number is the real price of the ordering guarantee and belongs in front of whoever asked for it.
  4. Handle the idle partition explicitly, because it fails the feed rather than corrupting it: a partition with no traffic never advances its own maximum, so the watermark freezes and output stops entirely. Either every partition emits a periodic idle marker carrying the broker's current time, or the watermark falls back to wall clock for a partition silent beyond a threshold.
Follow-up
  • The lateness budget is raised to five minutes. What is the new buffer, and what besides memory changes?
  • The consumer restarts. Where does it resume from, and what does the feed look like for the first 30 seconds?

Built from the rounds and topics Havis candidates report.

Small steps. Visible outcomes.0 / 7 completed
ONE WEEK · YOUR PACE

Prepare, practise & reflect

One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.

0 / 7 done
01Map the Havis loop
  • Write out the reported sequence: Application Review, Standardized Testing, Face-to-Face Interactions, Technical Assessments.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

02Work Troubleshooting
  • Spend the session on Troubleshooting, which Havis candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Troubleshooting and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Troubleshooting.

03Work Electrical/Electronic Systems
  • Spend the session on Electrical/Electronic Systems, which Havis candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Electrical/Electronic Systems and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Electrical/Electronic Systems.

04Work Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
  • Spend the session on Root Cause Analysis (RCA), which Havis candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Root Cause Analysis (RCA).

05Answer out loud: Technical & Domain Knowledge
  • Answer aloud, timed: Talk to me about this design project listed on your resume.
  • Answer aloud, timed: What is your understanding of the duties of this position?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical & Domain Knowledge question(s), under time.

06Answer out loud: Behavioral & Problem-Solving
  • Answer aloud, timed: Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple customer-reported issues simultaneously?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral & Problem-Solving question(s), under time.

07Dry run for Havis
  • Run one full mock under time, then write down the two questions you most want to ask your interviewers.

Deliverable: A completed timed mock and two questions to ask.

Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

medium
Behavioral & Problem-Solving

Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple customer-reported issues simultaneously?

medium
Behavioral & Problem-Solving

How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple customer-reported issues simultaneously?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a situation where you identified a product limitation or non-conformance; how did you communicate thi

medium
Behavioral & Problem-Solving

Describe a situation where you identified a product limitation or non-conformance; how did you communicate this to your team?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

How do you handle feedback on your technical design or documentation?

medium
Behavioral & Problem-Solving

How do you handle feedback on your technical design or documentation?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?
  • 01

    Tell me about a time you had to explain a complex technical concept to a non-technical stakeholder.

  • 02

    How do you prioritize tasks when managing multiple customer-reported issues simultaneously?

  • 03

    Describe a situation where you identified a product limitation or non-conformance; how did you communicate this to your team?

  • 04

    How do you handle feedback on your technical design or documentation?

PracHub preparation framework ↗
How long should I spend preparing for the technical assessment?

Dedicate at least 5–7 days to reviewing your core engineering principles and practicing your technical writing. The assessments are designed to be challenging, so being well-rested and prepared is essential.

Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What is the most common reason candidates do not move forward?

The most common reason is an inability to clearly articulate their problem-solving process or a lack of preparation regarding the specific design projects listed on their resume.

Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Will I be working alone or in a team?

You will work independently on technical tasks but will be part of a broader engineering department that relies on your input to improve future product cycles.

Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Is there significant travel involved?

Yes, many roles require approximately 25% travel, which may occasionally include international trips for site visits or product deployments.

Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What topics does Havis test in interviews?

Havis interviews most often cover CRM (Salesforce or Comparable CRM), Troubleshooting, B2B Sales (New Business Development), Electrical/Electronic Systems, and Sales Pipeline Management. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.

Havis Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗

No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.