As a Software Engineer at HiLabs, you are at the forefront of transforming healthcare data into actionable intelligence. This role is critical to our mission of cleaning and organizing complex, messy healthcare datasets, which directly impacts the quality of patient care and the efficiency of healthcare providers. You will build and scale robust systems that handle massive volumes of information, requiring a blend of technical precision and creative problem-solving. You will contribute to our core product architecture, working alongside cross-functional teams to tackle challenges ranging from data ingestion and processing to building responsive, intuitive front-end interfaces. Because our work sits at the intersection of healthcare technology and data engineering, you will be expected to balance high-level system design with the implementation of performant, maintainable code. This is a role for engineers who thrive on complexity and are motivated by the tangible impact their software has on the healthcare ecosystem.
Technical Screening
reportedInitial assessment of your practical engineering skills, often involving coding or system design.
What to demonstrate
- Initial assessment of your practical engineering skills, often involving coding or system design
- Depth in Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Implement a binary search algorithm to find an element in a sorted array.
- Answer aloud and timed: Explain the logic behind hashing and how you would handle collisions.
Deep-Dive Interviews
reportedIn-depth discussions focusing on specific technical skills and architectural knowledge.
What to demonstrate
- In-depth discussions focusing on specific technical skills and architectural knowledge
- Depth in Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Write a function to print elements from a nested array in JavaScript.
- Answer aloud and timed: Solve a string manipulation problem with a focus on optimal performance.
Managerial Discussion
reportedFinal conversation with management to evaluate fit within the team and company culture.
What to demonstrate
- Final conversation with management to evaluate fit within the team and company culture
- Depth in Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA)
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Build a specific React component based on a set of requirements.
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you handle efficient data fetching and state management in a large-scale React application?
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Clarify early
Always ask clarifying questions before starting a coding problem. It demonstrates that you think before you act.
Think aloud
Your interviewer wants to hear your thought process. Even if you are stuck, communicate what you are considering.
Be prepared for resume deep-dives
Expect to discuss the most challenging project you have worked on in detail. Be ready to explain the technical hurdles you faced and how you overcame them.
Know the stack
Research the technologies used at HiLabs and be ready to discuss how your previous experience translates to our stack.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Implement a binary search algorithm to find an element in a sorted array.
Implement a binary search algorithm to find an element in a sorted array.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Explain the logic behind hashing and how you would handle collisions.
Explain the logic behind hashing and how you would handle collisions.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Write a function to print elements from a nested array in JavaScript.
Write a function to print elements from a nested array in JavaScript.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Solve a string manipulation problem with a focus on optimal performance.
Solve a string manipulation problem with a focus on optimal performance.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
How would you optimize SQL queries for a high-traffic database?
How would you optimize SQL queries for a high-traffic database?
Approach
- Name the grain you start from and join outward from it.
- Check whether any join is one-to-many before aggregating, or the sums inflate.
- Say which index the query would use, and what makes it unusable.
- Handle the rows that do not match: that is usually the actual question.
Follow-up
- How does the query change if that join becomes one-to-many?
- What happens to this when the table is ten times larger?
Explain why the owner filter ignores the listing index
The only index on resource is (tenant_id, status, updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC). A new endpoint returns one user's resources across all statuses, newest created first: WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND owner_user_id = $2 ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20. On a tenant with 2M rows it takes 900 ms and EXPLAIN shows a sort above a large scan. Explain precisely why the existing index cannot serve it, give the index that can, and state which of these the new index still will not help: owner_user_id alone across tenants; the same query ordered by updated_at. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Separate the two jobs an index does. For filtering, a composite btree is seekable only on a left prefix, so with no predicate on status the scan can at best range over tenant_id and test owner_user_id per row; PostgreSQL 16 has no btree skip scan to jump the unconstrained column.
- For ordering, the index is sorted by (status, updated_at) within a tenant and not by created_at, so the LIMIT cannot stop early: every matching row is read and then sorted. That is the 'Sort Method: top-N heapsort' line, and it is why the plan reads 2M rows to answer with 20.
- Derive the replacement from the access path — equality, equality, then the ordering column: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON resource (tenant_id, owner_user_id, created_at DESC). The scan seeks to the (tenant, owner) range and walks 20 entries in order, so the Sort node disappears along with the row-read.
- Treat INCLUDE (title, status) as conditional, not free. An index-only scan still visits the heap for any row whose page is not marked all-visible, so on a table taking 1.2k writes/second the win depends on autovacuum keeping the visibility map current, and the wider index costs more on every insert.
Follow-up
- 90% of rows are status='active'. Would a partial index WHERE status = 'active' change your answer, and for which of the three queries?
- A dashboard runs this for 40 owners in one page load. What changes about the design?
Build a specific React component based on a set of requirements.
Build a specific React component based on a set of requirements.
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Implement a custom CSS design from scratch.
Implement a custom CSS design from scratch.
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Explain the lifecycle of an API call from the UI layer to the backend.
Explain the lifecycle of an API call from the UI layer to the backend.
Approach
- Say who the caller is and what they do when the call fails halfway.
- Define the identity of a request so a retry cannot double-apply it.
- Separate accepted, pending, failed and confirmed; they are different facts.
- Design the error taxonomy before the success shape; callers branch on it.
Follow-up
- What happens if the caller retries after a timeout?
- How does a client discover it is on an old version of this contract?
Design a scalable system component; explain your choice of database and schema.
Design a scalable system component; explain your choice of database and schema.
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Discuss the differences between various database indexing strategies.
Discuss the differences between various database indexing strategies.
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Explain the principles of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) and how you implement them in Java or Spring Boot.
Explain the principles of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) and how you implement them in Java or Spring Boot.
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
Every query on one table stalls for forty seconds mid-deploy
During a release on PostgreSQL, every query touching resource times out for about 40 seconds and then recovers with no intervention. The release ran one migration, ALTER TABLE resource ADD COLUMN archived_reason TEXT, and the migration log shows it completing in 6 ms. Unrelated tables showed no change in error rate. Explain how a 6 ms statement caused a 40-second stall, give the ordered checks you would run on a live system to confirm it, and give the migration procedure that prevents a repeat.
Approach
- Separate the statement's duration from the lock's duration. ADD COLUMN with no default is a catalogue-only change and genuinely runs in milliseconds, but it requires ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, and it cannot acquire that until every transaction already touching the table has finished.
- Account for the queueing, which is the part that surprises people. A lock request that is waiting blocks later requests for conflicting modes behind it rather than letting them overtake, so one long-open transaction holds the DDL and the DDL holds all the traffic. The stall length is set by the longest open transaction, not by the size of the change.
- Confirm on a live system in this order: pg_stat_activity for that table ordered by xact_start, looking for the oldest transaction and specifically for state = idle in transaction; then pg_locks where granted = false to find the waiter; then join them on pid to name blocker and blocked. pg_blocking_pids() does that join for you and is the fastest single call.
- Prevent rather than merely time it better. Set lock_timeout to a second or two on the migration session so the DDL abandons the queue after a bounded wait and is retried, instead of holding it for as long as the oldest transaction lives. Be exact about what that buys: queries arriving during the wait still queue behind the pending ACCESS EXCLUSIVE request, so each attempt costs them up to one lock_timeout of added latency. The outage goes from 40 seconds to about one second per attempt, not to zero. Also run migrations away from deploy-time peaks, and put a statement timeout and an idle-in-transaction timeout on the analytics role that opens the long transactions.
Follow-up
- The same release also wants NOT NULL on that column. What is the sequence that gets there without a long lock?
- Your lock_timeout retry fails ten times in a row because the analytics transaction is always open. What do you change?
Built from the rounds and topics HiLabs candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the HiLabs loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Technical Screening, Deep-Dive Interviews, Managerial Discussion.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 3 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA)
- Spend the session on Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA), which HiLabs candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA) and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA).
03Work React
- Spend the session on React, which HiLabs candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in React and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in React.
04Work System Design
- Spend the session on System Design, which HiLabs candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in System Design and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in System Design.
05Answer out loud: Data Structures and Algorithms
- Answer aloud, timed: Implement a binary search algorithm to find an element in a sorted array.
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the logic behind hashing and how you would handle collisions.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Data Structures and Algorithms question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Web Development and Frontend Architecture
- Answer aloud, timed: Build a specific React component based on a set of requirements.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle efficient data fetching and state management in a large-scale React application?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Web Development and Frontend Architecture question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: System Design and Backend Fundamentals
- Answer aloud, timed: Design a scalable system component; explain your choice of database and schema.
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you optimize SQL queries for a high-traffic database?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported System Design and Backend Fundamentals question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
How do you handle efficient data fetching and state management in a large-scale React application?
How do you handle efficient data fetching and state management in a large-scale React application?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Narrate an outage you owned from page to postmortem
Pick an incident you personally drove, ideally one where writes were affected rather than reads. In six to eight minutes: state the symptom as it first appeared on a dashboard, the blast radius you established before you knew the cause, the mitigation you applied and when, the mechanism you eventually proved, and the follow-up that would prevent a repeat. Bring numbers: error rate, tenants affected, minutes to mitigate, minutes to resolve. If you cannot name what you measured, choose a different incident.
Approach
- Open on the signal rather than the cause: which metric at which percentile moved, on which service, at what time, so the listener follows the same evidence you had rather than a conclusion you already reached.
- Separate mitigation from diagnosis out loud. State what you did to stop the bleeding (flag off, shed traffic, drain a lease, roll back a deploy) and say plainly that you did it before the mechanism was known, because those are two jobs with different deadlines.
- Establish blast radius in countable terms: how many tenants, how many writes, and crucially whether the effect was loss or only delay. An append-only revision table or a pending outbox row means the change survived and the projection was merely behind, which is a repair rather than a data-loss incident.
- Prove the mechanism instead of asserting it. Name the trace span that grew, the plan that flipped to a sequential scan, the lease that expired, plus one alternative you ruled out and the signal that stayed flat while you ruled it out.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently in the first five minutes, given the same dashboard and no more information?
- Which follow-up action did you deliberately not take, and why was dropping it the right call?
Argue against a design, lose, and commit anyway
Describe a design you argued against and lost. State the failure you predicted as a named mechanism, not a feeling about complexity: two services that would need one transaction, a projection with no rebuild path, a write path with no idempotency key. Say what evidence you brought, what the decision maker weighed instead, and what you did after the decision was made: what you instrumented, what you wrote down, and whether the prediction came true. Five minutes.
Approach
- State the prediction in falsifiable form up front: the mechanism, the condition that triggers it, and the observable outcome. A prediction that cannot be checked also cannot be credited to you later.
- Show the evidence you had at the time and label each piece honestly as measured, analogous, or intuition. Keeping the intuition is fine; disguising it as data is the thing that erodes your standing in the next argument.
- Represent the opposing case at full strength, including the constraint you did not control: a fixed date, a team boundary, or the fact that the decision was cheap to reverse and yours was not.
- Make disagree-and-commit concrete. Name the artefact you left behind so the prediction could be settled without you: the alert and its threshold, the counter on the dashboard, the decision note that recorded the trade-off and the condition that would revisit it.
Follow-up
- What threshold on that alert would have proved you right, and did anyone ever look at it?
- If the same proposal arrived tomorrow with the same deadline, would you argue it the same way?
- 01
How do you handle efficient data fetching and state management in a large-scale React application?
- 02
Pick an incident you personally drove, ideally one where writes were affected rather than reads. In six to eight minutes: state the symptom as it first appeared on a dashboard, the blast radius you established before you knew the cause, the mitigation you applied and when, the mechanism you eventually proved, and the follow-up that would prevent a repeat. Bring numbers: error rate, tenants affected, minutes to mitigate, minutes to resolve. If you cannot name what you measured, choose a different incident.
- 03
Describe a design you argued against and lost. State the failure you predicted as a named mechanism, not a feeling about complexity: two services that would need one transaction, a projection with no rebuild path, a write path with no idempotency key. Say what evidence you brought, what the decision maker weighed instead, and what you did after the decision was made: what you instrumented, what you wrote down, and whether the prediction came true. Five minutes.
How difficult are the technical interviews?
The difficulty is generally average to challenging. The focus is on practical, real-world application rather than "trick" questions.
HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Should I expect a take-home assignment?
While some rounds involve machine coding, the process is primarily centered on live, interactive interviews. Expect to code on a whiteboard or a shared editor.
HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the culture like at HiLabs?
We pride ourselves on a culture of transparency and collaboration. We value engineers who are eager to learn and who support their peers.
HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How long does the process typically take?
The process is designed to be efficient. You can expect a decision or update within a few days after your final round. ##### Tip The "work from anywhere" culture is a key part of our identity. Feel free to ask your interviewer how they maintain team cohesion in a distributed environment.
HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does HiLabs test in interviews?
HiLabs interviews most often cover Data Structures & Algorithms (DSA), SQL, Stakeholder Communication, Python, and Playwright. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01HiLabs Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
GitHub Software Engineer Interview Questions & Guide 2026
Testing exercises for GitHub software engineer prep: choosing boundary cases over repetition, isolating tests from shared clock and ordering, and treating an intermittent failure as a defect rather than noise.
Zoom Communications Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Zoom Communications asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Zemoso Technologies Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Zemoso Technologies asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
YASH Technologies Software Engineer Interview Guide
What YASH Technologies asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.