The role of a Software Engineer at Kairos is pivotal in driving innovation and delivering robust technological solutions that enhance user experiences and streamline operations. As a Software Engineer, you will be at the forefront of developing software applications that power various products, enabling our clients to achieve their business objectives effectively. Your contributions will not only impact the functionality of our software but will also play a crucial role in shaping the strategic direction of our technology initiatives. At Kairos, your work will involve collaborating with diverse teams, including product management, design, and quality assurance, to create scalable and efficient software solutions. You will engage in projects that span multiple domains, from backend development using Java and Python to frontend engineering with frameworks like Angular and React. This role offers the opportunity to work on complex challenges, leveraging cutting-edge technologies to innovate and improve our product offerings, ultimately making a significant impact on our users and the business as a whole.
Initial Screening
reportedAn initial review of the candidate's qualifications and fit for the role.
What to demonstrate
- An initial review of the candidate's qualifications and fit for the role
- Depth in Backend Development
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Technical Assessment
reportedEvaluation of technical skills through coding challenges or assessments.
What to demonstrate
- Evaluation of technical skills through coding challenges or assessments
- Depth in Backend Development
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: What are the differences between REST and SOAP APIs?
- Answer aloud and timed: Can you explain the concept of closures in JavaScript?
Technical Interview
reportedInterviews with technical team members to assess problem-solving and technical capabilities.
What to demonstrate
- Interviews with technical team members to assess problem-solving and technical capabilities
- Depth in Backend Development
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you optimize performance in an Angular application?
- Answer aloud and timed: Describe a challenging technical problem you faced and how you resolved it.
HR Interview
reportedDiscussion with HR to evaluate soft skills and cultural fit within the company.
What to demonstrate
- Discussion with HR to evaluate soft skills and cultural fit within the company
- Depth in Backend Development
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How would you approach debugging a performance issue in a web application?
- Answer aloud and timed: If you were tasked with designing a new feature for an existing product, how would you begin?
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Prepare for coding challenges
Practice coding problems on platforms like LeetCode or HackerRank to sharpen your skills.
Understand the company values
Familiarize yourself with Kairos’ mission and values, and be ready to discuss how you align with them.
Show enthusiasm for technology
Demonstrate your passion for software development and continuous learning during your interviews.
Practice your communication skills
Be clear and articulate when discussing technical concepts, especially to non-technical stakeholders.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Can you explain the concept of closures in JavaScript?
Can you explain the concept of closures in JavaScript?
Approach
- Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
- Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
- Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
- Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
- What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
- Where could this allocate more than you expect?
Track a rolling failure rate per destination for circuit decisions
The egress service delivers about 1,500 webhooks per second across roughly 40,000 destinations, each call bounded by a 10 second timeout. Maintain, per destination, the failure rate over the trailing 60 seconds so a caller can ask before dispatch whether the circuit should open. Attempts arrive as (destination_id, finished_at_ms, outcome). Requirement: amortised O(1) per attempt, with total memory bounded by the destination count rather than by traffic. Give the structure, its exact memory, and the rule that stops a destination with three attempts from opening a circuit.
Approach
- Name the exact-deque version and then reject it as the default. Holding timestamps and advancing a tail pointer past anything older than now minus 60 seconds is a correct two-pointer window at amortised O(1) per attempt, but its memory tracks in-window traffic, so one destination in a retry storm holds hundreds of thousands of entries while thousands of quiet destinations hold none.
- Use a ring of 60 one-second buckets per destination, each bucket a pair of counters for attempts and failures. On an attempt, advance the ring by the elapsed whole seconds, zeroing at most min(elapsed, 60) buckets, then increment the head. That is amortised O(1) with a fixed footprint per destination.
- State the footprint: 60 buckets times two 4-byte counters is 480 bytes of payload per destination, so 40,000 destinations is roughly 20 to 25 MB with per-entry overhead, bounded by the catalogue rather than by the rate. The cost is granularity, since the oldest bucket ages out in whole seconds, which is far tighter than the decision needs.
- Require a minimum sample before the circuit may open. A destination with three attempts and three failures reads as 100 percent and is not evidence; a floor of roughly 20 attempts in the window makes the ratio meaningful, and below that floor use a run of consecutive failures as the trigger instead.
Follow-up
- The fleet is 30 instances and each sees roughly a thirtieth of a destination's traffic. Where does the rate actually live, and what does a per-instance answer get wrong?
- A destination answers in 9.5 seconds and succeeds. It is not failing but it is consuming your per-destination concurrency. What signal should open the circuit here?
Collapse a redelivered event batch into per-aggregate high-water marks
You drain a batch of up to 5,000,000 events, each (aggregate_id BIGINT, aggregate_version INT, event_type, payload). The log guarantees order within one aggregate only; the batch merges 64 partitions, and a relay failover has redelivered a range, so an older version for an aggregate can appear after a newer one. Given a map of last_applied_version per aggregate, produce the events worth applying, at most one per (aggregate_id, version), plus the count discarded. Target O(n) time. State the memory for 2,000,000 distinct aggregates and what you do when it does not fit.
Approach
- One pass, one hash map from aggregate_id to the highest version kept, and a discard counter. An event whose version is at or below last_applied_version for its aggregate is dropped without further work, which is the whole reason the event carries its version rather than a delta. O(n) expected time, O(d) space in distinct aggregates.
- Keep the maximum, never the last occurrence. The redelivered range means the final appearance of an aggregate in the batch can be an older version than one seen earlier in the same batch, so last-wins applies stale state over newer state and the projection regresses with no error anywhere.
- Cost the memory instead of calling it large: an 8-byte key plus a 4-byte version is 12 bytes of payload, and an open-addressed table held at a 0.7 load factor costs roughly 17 bytes per entry before per-slot metadata, so 2,000,000 aggregates is tens of megabytes in a native layout and several times that in a runtime that boxes both key and value.
- If the distinct set exceeds memory, partition on hash(aggregate_id) mod P and reduce each partition independently. Every event for one aggregate hashes to the same partition, so the per-partition result is exact and the merge is concatenation rather than a second reduction.
Follow-up
- The payload is a patch rather than a snapshot, so applying only the highest version loses the intermediate changes. What changes in your reduction?
- How do you detect that version 7 arrived while version 6 was never delivered, and what should the consumer do about the gap?
Stop tag and share joins from fanning out a page
resource_tag is (resource_id, tag_id) with PK (resource_id, tag_id); resource_share is (resource_id, shared_with_user_id, permission). The tagged-and-shared listing inner-joins resource to both, filters tenant_id, tag_id = ANY($2) and shared_with_user_id = $3, orders by updated_at DESC and takes 50. Pages come back with fewer than 50 distinct resources and the total in the header is far too high. Explain the row multiplication, rewrite both the page query and the count query so each is correct, and name the index each one needs. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Do the arithmetic against the predicates that are actually there. An inner join emits one row per matching child row, and both joins are filtered: tag_id = ANY($2) admits only the requested tags, shared_with_user_id = $3 admits one user's share rows. So a resource holding three of the requested tags and shared with $3 once yields three rows, not one — the multiplier is its count of matching tags times its share rows for that single user, and that second factor is 1 unless the table admits duplicate (resource_id, shared_with_user_id) pairs. LIMIT 50 then limits rows rather than resources, and COUNT(*) counts pairs — the header is the product, not the population.
- Reject DISTINCT as the fix. It deduplicates after the product has been built, so the planner must materialise and sort the fanned-out set before the LIMIT can apply, and it leaves any SUM or AVG in the same select list wrong.
- Rewrite both filters as semi-joins, keeping resource as the only row source: AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM resource_tag rt WHERE rt.resource_id = r.resource_id AND rt.tag_id = ANY($2)) and the same shape against resource_share. A semi-join stops at the first match per resource and preserves the driving index order, so ORDER BY updated_at DESC, resource_id DESC LIMIT 50 still stops after 50 rows.
- Count with the same predicates and no join at all: SELECT count(*) FROM resource r WHERE r.tenant_id = $1 AND r.status = 'active' AND EXISTS (...) AND EXISTS (...). Nothing multiplies a resource, so the number is the population.
Follow-up
- The filter changes from 'any of these tags' to 'all of these tags'. Rewrite it and state what it costs relative to the ANY form.
- A resource can be shared with the same user twice under different permissions. Does your count change, and should it?
Find version gaps and relay lag with window functions
outbox_event holds event_id, aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status ('pending','published','dead'), attempts, created_at, published_at. A projection is missing rows and you must decide whether the relay skipped events or the consumer dropped them. Write three queries over the last seven days: one listing every aggregate_id whose published aggregate_version sequence has a hole, one giving per-day counts with a running total, and one returning the newest published event per aggregate. For each, say where the window function is evaluated relative to WHERE and LIMIT. PostgreSQL 16.
Approach
- Gaps: compute lead(aggregate_version) OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version) in a subquery, then filter next_version <> aggregate_version + 1 in the outer query. Window functions are evaluated after WHERE, GROUP BY and HAVING and before the outer ORDER BY and LIMIT, so the predicate cannot sit in the same WHERE clause and PostgreSQL 16 has no QUALIFY.
- Say what the seven-day filter does to the answer: it truncates every partition, so the first row per aggregate has no predecessor inside the window and a hole spanning the boundary is invisible. Widen the window, or join to resource.version as the authority for the true maximum.
- Running total: SELECT date_trunc('day', created_at) AS d, count() AS n, sum(count()) OVER (ORDER BY date_trunc('day', created_at) ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING). An aggregate inside a window call is legal because grouping runs before windowing. The grouping key is unique per row here so ROWS and RANGE agree, but write the frame anyway — over ungrouped rows with tied timestamps the default RANGE frame pulls in every peer row and the total jumps.
- Newest per aggregate: DISTINCT ON (aggregate_id) ... ORDER BY aggregate_id, aggregate_version DESC is the cheap PostgreSQL-only form when an index matches that order; row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY aggregate_id ORDER BY aggregate_version DESC) = 1 is the portable form and needs a subquery for the same evaluation-order reason as the gap query.
Follow-up
- Relay failover redelivers events. Does a duplicate break the gap query, and how would you detect one from this table alone?
- Turn the gap check into a continuous monitor rather than a query someone runs after an incident. What does it watch?
What are the differences between REST and SOAP APIs?
What are the differences between REST and SOAP APIs?
Approach
- Say who the caller is and what they do when the call fails halfway.
- Define the identity of a request so a retry cannot double-apply it.
- Separate accepted, pending, failed and confirmed; they are different facts.
- Design the error taxonomy before the success shape; callers branch on it.
Follow-up
- What happens if the caller retries after a timeout?
- How does a client discover it is on an old version of this contract?
How do you optimize performance in an Angular application?
How do you optimize performance in an Angular application?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Describe a challenging technical problem you faced and how you resolved it.
Describe a challenging technical problem you faced and how you resolved it.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
If you were tasked with designing a new feature for an existing product, how would you begin?
If you were tasked with designing a new feature for an existing product, how would you begin?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How would you design a scalable notification system for a web application?
How would you design a scalable notification system for a web application?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
What considerations do you take into account when designing a microservices architecture?
What considerations do you take into account when designing a microservices architecture?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
How would you approach debugging a performance issue in a web application?
How would you approach debugging a performance issue in a web application?
Approach
- Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
- Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
- Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
- Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.
Follow-up
- What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
- How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?
Built from the rounds and topics Kairos candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the Kairos loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Technical Assessment, Technical Interview, HR Interview.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Backend Development
- Spend the session on Backend Development, which Kairos candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Backend Development and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Backend Development.
03Work Angular
- Spend the session on Angular, which Kairos candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Angular and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Angular.
04Work Cloud Architecture
- Spend the session on Cloud Architecture, which Kairos candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Cloud Architecture and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Cloud Architecture.
05Answer out loud: Technical / Domain Questions
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe your experience with JavaScript and its applications in web development.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you handle asynchronous programming in Java?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical / Domain Questions question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Problem-Solving / Case Studies
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a challenging technical problem you faced and how you resolved it.
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach debugging a performance issue in a web application?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Problem-Solving / Case Studies question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Behavioral / Leadership
- Answer aloud, timed: Tell me about a time when you had to collaborate with a difficult team member. How did you handle it?
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a situation where you had to adapt to significant changes in your project scope or technology stack.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral / Leadership question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
Describe your experience with JavaScript and its applications in web development.
Describe your experience with JavaScript and its applications in web development.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
How do you handle asynchronous programming in Java?
How do you handle asynchronous programming in Java?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Tell me about a time when you had to collaborate with a difficult team member. How did you handle it?
Tell me about a time when you had to collaborate with a difficult team member. How did you handle it?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Describe a situation where you had to adapt to significant changes in your project scope or technology stack.
Describe a situation where you had to adapt to significant changes in your project scope or technology stack.
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
What motivates you as a Software Engineer, and how do you stay current with technological advancements?
What motivates you as a Software Engineer, and how do you stay current with technological advancements?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
Describe your experience with JavaScript and its applications in web development.
- 02
How do you handle asynchronous programming in Java?
- 03
Tell me about a time when you had to collaborate with a difficult team member. How did you handle it?
- 04
Describe a situation where you had to adapt to significant changes in your project scope or technology stack.
What is the typical interview difficulty level?
The interview difficulty is generally moderate, focusing on both technical and behavioral aspects. Candidates should prepare for coding challenges as well as discussions about past experiences and problem-solving approaches.
Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How long does the interview process usually take?
Candidates can expect the process to take a few weeks from the initial screening to the final interviews, depending on availability and scheduling.
Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What differentiates successful candidates at Kairos?
Successful candidates typically exhibit a strong technical foundation, effective problem-solving skills, and an ability to collaborate well within teams while aligning with the company’s values.
Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the company culture like at Kairos?
The culture at Kairos emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and continuous learning. Employees are encouraged to share ideas and contribute to projects that drive the company’s mission forward.
Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does Kairos test in interviews?
Kairos interviews most often cover JavaScript, Angular, Backend Engineering, React, and Test Automation. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01Kairos Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22
Explore related engineering environments and compare the preparation focus.
WorldWide Technology Holding Software Engineer Interview Guide
What WorldWide Technology Holding asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
XYZ Software Engineer Interview Guide
What XYZ asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
Walgreens Boots Alliance Software Engineer Interview Guide
What Walgreens Boots Alliance asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.
The Federal National Mortgage Association - Fannie Mae Software Engineer Interview Guide
What The Federal National Mortgage Association - Fannie Mae asks Software Engineer candidates, from reported rounds and questions.