Lockton Companies · Software Engineer
Updated · 2026-10-02

Lockton Companies Software Engineer
Interview Guide

THE 60-SECOND BRIEF

At Lockton Companies, a Software Engineer does not just write code; they build the proprietary platforms, risk assessment tools, and actuarial valuation systems that drive the world's largest independent insurance brokerage. Because Lockton Companies operates without the pressure of public shareholders, the technology team has the unique freedom to focus on long-term client-centric solutions. Your work as a Software Engineer will directly impact how brokers, risk analysts, and actuaries analyze complex risk profiles, price policies, and deliver specialized consulting to global clients. Depending on the specific team you join, you might find yourself working as an Actuarial Developer building complex mathematical modeling engines, or as a Software Engineer focusing on property risk systems.

This guide is scoped to a Software Engineer candidate at Lockton Companies.

Lockton Companies candidates report 2 rounds over 2-4 weeks. The stages below are what candidates describe, not a published process.

Basic Technical QuestionsActuarial Software Development (Domain Knowledge)Technical Screening

18 min read

Browse Software Engineer questions

See the practice prompts

16Practice promptsAcross five skill areas

At Lockton Companies, a Software Engineer does not just write code; they build the proprietary platforms, risk assessment tools, and actuarial valuation systems that drive the world's largest independent insurance brokerage. Because Lockton Companies operates without the pressure of public shareholders, the technology team has the unique freedom to focus on long-term client-centric solutions. Your work as a Software Engineer will directly impact how brokers, risk analysts, and actuaries analyze complex risk profiles, price policies, and deliver specialized consulting to global clients. Depending on the specific team you join, you might find yourself working as an Actuarial Developer building complex mathematical modeling engines, or as a Software Engineer focusing on property risk systems. These systems process vast amounts of exposure data, requiring highly performant, scalable, and secure code. Engineers here work in a collaborative environment where technical skills are deeply integrated with business domain knowledge. By joining the technology team at Lockton Companies, you will work on modernizing legacy insurance workflows, developing predictive analytics platforms, and creating intuitive user interfaces. It is a highly collaborative and intellectually stimulating environment where your technical decisions have a visible, direct impact on the company's bottom-line performance and client satisfaction.

01

Virtual Screening

reported

Initial screening via Microsoft Teams focusing on career background, technical experience, and role alignment.

What to demonstrate

  • Initial screening via Microsoft Teams focusing on career background, technical experience, and role alignment
  • Depth in Basic Technical Questions

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: Explain the difference between an abstract class and an interface, and when you would use each.
  • Answer aloud and timed: How do you optimize a slow-running SQL query, and what is the role of indexing in database performance?
Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
02

Final Round Interview

reported

Conducted either in-person at regional offices or as a virtual panel with hiring managers and directors.

What to demonstrate

  • Conducted either in-person at regional offices or as a virtual panel with hiring managers and directors
  • Depth in Basic Technical Questions

How to prepare

  • Answer aloud and timed: Describe the principles of object-oriented programming and how you have applied them in your recent projects.
  • Answer aloud and timed: What are the differences between value types and reference types in your primary programming language?
Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗

PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.

01

Understand the Business Model

Take time to learn what an insurance broker does and how it differs from an insurance carrier. Showing that you understand Lockton's client-first advisory model will make a fantastic impression on the hiring managers.

02

Be Prepared for Behavioral Scenarios

Use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to structure your answers to behavioral questions. Focus on outcomes and highlight how you collaborated with others to achieve success.

03

Lockton values long-term career growth

During your interviews with directors and managers, express your interest in growing with the company and learning the business domain over time.

Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.

10 technical prompts0 include a worked solution

What are the differences between value types and reference types in your primary programming language?

medium
Technical & Core Programming

What are the differences between value types and reference types in your primary programming language?

Approach
  1. Say what the runtime actually does before reasoning about the code.
  2. Name what is shared across threads and what owns each piece of state.
  3. Identify the window where an invariant is briefly untrue.
  4. Distinguish a value from a reference to it, and say which one you handed out.
Follow-up
  • What happens if two callers reach this at the same time?
  • Where could this allocate more than you expect?

Collapse a redelivered event batch into per-aggregate high-water marks

easy
hashingat-least-onceaggregation

You drain a batch of up to 5,000,000 events, each (aggregate_id BIGINT, aggregate_version INT, event_type, payload). The log guarantees order within one aggregate only; the batch merges 64 partitions, and a relay failover has redelivered a range, so an older version for an aggregate can appear after a newer one. Given a map of last_applied_version per aggregate, produce the events worth applying, at most one per (aggregate_id, version), plus the count discarded. Target O(n) time. State the memory for 2,000,000 distinct aggregates and what you do when it does not fit.

Approach
  1. One pass, one hash map from aggregate_id to the highest version kept, and a discard counter. An event whose version is at or below last_applied_version for its aggregate is dropped without further work, which is the whole reason the event carries its version rather than a delta. O(n) expected time, O(d) space in distinct aggregates.
  2. Keep the maximum, never the last occurrence. The redelivered range means the final appearance of an aggregate in the batch can be an older version than one seen earlier in the same batch, so last-wins applies stale state over newer state and the projection regresses with no error anywhere.
  3. Cost the memory instead of calling it large: an 8-byte key plus a 4-byte version is 12 bytes of payload, and an open-addressed table held at a 0.7 load factor costs roughly 17 bytes per entry before per-slot metadata, so 2,000,000 aggregates is tens of megabytes in a native layout and several times that in a runtime that boxes both key and value.
  4. If the distinct set exceeds memory, partition on hash(aggregate_id) mod P and reduce each partition independently. Every event for one aggregate hashes to the same partition, so the per-partition result is exact and the merge is concatenation rather than a second reduction.
Follow-up
  • The payload is a patch rather than a snapshot, so applying only the highest version loses the intermediate changes. What changes in your reduction?
  • How do you detect that version 7 arrived while version 6 was never delivered, and what should the consumer do about the gap?

Merge partitioned event streams into one ordered feed with bounded lateness

hard
k-way mergewatermarksout-of-order streams

The read-model service consumes 64 log partitions carrying about 4,000 events per second in total. Each partition is ordered within itself, but partitions drift by up to 30 seconds, and the activity feed must present a tenant's events in occurred_at order. Produce the merge. State its complexity, the buffer it requires in events and in bytes, what happens when one partition is idle, and what you do with an event that arrives after you have already emitted its position. Payloads average 1 KB.

Approach
  1. Merge with a min-heap over the 64 partition heads keyed on (occurred_at, event_id): O(log P) per event and O(n log P) overall. The tie-break on event_id is what makes the output deterministic when two partitions carry the same millisecond, which matters because the feed is paginated and a non-deterministic order reorders pages under the reader.
  2. Emitting the heap head is only correct once every partition has produced everything up to that timestamp, so the emit condition is a watermark: the minimum across partitions of the highest occurred_at seen, less the allowed lateness. Events are held until the watermark passes them, which is what turns individually ordered streams into a jointly ordered one.
  3. Size the buffer from the lateness rather than guessing: 4,000 events per second times 30 seconds is 120,000 buffered events, and at 1 KB each about 120 MB of heap. That number is the real price of the ordering guarantee and belongs in front of whoever asked for it.
  4. Handle the idle partition explicitly, because it fails the feed rather than corrupting it: a partition with no traffic never advances its own maximum, so the watermark freezes and output stops entirely. Either every partition emits a periodic idle marker carrying the broker's current time, or the watermark falls back to wall clock for a partition silent beyond a threshold.
Follow-up
  • The lateness budget is raised to five minutes. What is the new buffer, and what besides memory changes?
  • The consumer restarts. Where does it resume from, and what does the feed look like for the first 30 seconds?

Built from the rounds and topics Lockton Companies candidates report.

Small steps. Visible outcomes.0 / 7 completed
ONE WEEK · YOUR PACE

Prepare, practise & reflect

One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.

0 / 7 done
01Map the Lockton Companies loop
  • Write out the reported sequence: Virtual Screening, Final Round Interview.
  • For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.

Deliverable: A one-page map of the 2 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.

02Work Basic Technical Questions
  • Spend the session on Basic Technical Questions, which Lockton Companies candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Basic Technical Questions and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Basic Technical Questions.

03Work Actuarial Software Development (Domain Knowledge)
  • Spend the session on Actuarial Software Development (Domain Knowledge), which Lockton Companies candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Actuarial Software Development (Domain Knowledge) and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Actuarial Software Development (Domain Knowledge).

04Work Technical Screening
  • Spend the session on Technical Screening, which Lockton Companies candidates report being tested on.
  • Write one worked example in Technical Screening and time yourself on it.

Deliverable: One timed worked example in Technical Screening.

05Answer out loud: Technical & Core Programming
  • Answer aloud, timed: Explain the difference between an abstract class and an interface, and when you would use each.
  • Answer aloud, timed: How do you optimize a slow-running SQL query, and what is the role of indexing in database performance?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical & Core Programming question(s), under time.

06Answer out loud: Domain & Practical Problem-Solving
  • Answer aloud, timed: How would you design a data ingestion pipeline to process large daily files containing property risk metrics?
  • Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time when you had to write code to perform complex mathematical or statistical calculations. How did you ensure accuracy?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Domain & Practical Problem-Solving question(s), under time.

07Answer out loud: Behavioral & Cultural Alignment
  • Answer aloud, timed: Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with non-technical stakeholders, such as actuaries or business brokers, to define project requirements. How did you ensure clear communication?
  • Answer aloud, timed: Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a technical decision made by a teammate. How did you resolve the conflict?

Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral & Cultural Alignment question(s), under time.

Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.

Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.

How do you handle exception management and logging in a distributed application?

medium
Technical & Core Programming

How do you handle exception management and logging in a distributed application?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a time when you had to write code to perform complex mathematical or statistical calculations. How di

medium
Domain & Practical Problem-Solving

Describe a time when you had to write code to perform complex mathematical or statistical calculations. How did you ensure accuracy?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with non-technical stakeholders, such as actuaries or busine

medium
Behavioral & Cultural Alignment

Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with non-technical stakeholders, such as actuaries or business brokers, to define project requirements. How did you ensure clear communication?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a technical decision made by a teammate. How did you resolve the

medium
Behavioral & Cultural Alignment

Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a technical decision made by a teammate. How did you resolve the conflict?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Describe a project that did not go according to plan. What went wrong, what did you learn, and how did you han

medium
Behavioral & Cultural Alignment

Describe a project that did not go according to plan. What went wrong, what did you learn, and how did you handle it?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?

Why do you want to work at an independent, family-owned brokerage like Lockton Companies rather than a traditi

medium
Behavioral & Cultural Alignment

Why do you want to work at an independent, family-owned brokerage like Lockton Companies rather than a traditional public tech company?

Approach
  1. Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
  2. State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
  3. Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
  4. Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
  • What would you do differently if you ran that again?
  • How did you know your change caused the improvement?
  • 01

    How do you handle exception management and logging in a distributed application?

  • 02

    Describe a time when you had to write code to perform complex mathematical or statistical calculations. How did you ensure accuracy?

  • 03

    Describe a situation where you had to collaborate with non-technical stakeholders, such as actuaries or business brokers, to define project requirements. How did you ensure clear communication?

  • 04

    Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a technical decision made by a teammate. How did you resolve the conflict?

PracHub preparation framework ↗
How technical are the software engineering interviews at Lockton Companies?

The interviews are highly practical. While you need a strong understanding of coding principles, databases, and system design, you will not face highly abstract, competitive-programming-style algorithms. The focus is on your ability to build real, maintainable software.

Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What is the work culture like for engineers?

The culture is highly collaborative, supportive, and entrepreneurial. Because Lockton Companies is privately held, there is less bureaucratic red tape, allowing engineering teams to move quickly, experiment, and have a tangible impact on business operations.

Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Does Lockton Companies offer remote or hybrid work options?

Yes, Lockton Companies generally supports a hybrid work model. Specific expectations vary by office location (such as London, Kansas City, or Minneapolis) and the specific team, but most engineering roles offer a balance of remote flexibility and in-office collaboration.

Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
How fast does the hiring team make a decision?

The interview process is known for being exceptionally efficient. Because the process typically consists of only two interview stages, candidates often receive feedback and next steps within a couple of weeks of their initial conversation.

Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
What topics does Lockton Companies test in interviews?

Lockton Companies interviews most often cover Problem Solving, Behavioral Interviewing, Stakeholder Management, In-Person Interviewing, and Communication Skills. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.

Lockton Companies Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗

No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.