As a Software Engineer at Novant Health, you will play a crucial role in enhancing the technological capabilities of one of the leading healthcare organizations. Your contributions will directly impact patient care systems, streamline operations, and improve the overall user experience for both staff and patients. This role is critical in ensuring that Novant Health remains at the forefront of delivering innovative healthcare solutions, enabling seamless integration of advanced technologies within the organization. In your capacity as a Software Engineer, you will engage with diverse teams to develop, maintain, and enhance applications that support healthcare delivery. You will work on various projects that involve complex data systems, electronic health records, and patient management systems. Your work will not only influence the efficiency of operations but also elevate the standard of care provided to patients, making it a rewarding and impactful career path.
Initial Screening
reportedThe process begins with an initial screening round to assess basic qualifications and fit.
What to demonstrate
- The process begins with an initial screening round to assess basic qualifications and fit
- Depth in Technical Interview Round
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Technical Interviews
reportedCandidates undergo multiple technical interviews to evaluate their technical skills and problem-solving capabilities.
What to demonstrate
- Candidates undergo multiple technical interviews to evaluate their technical skills and problem-solving capabilities
- Depth in Technical Interview Round
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you ensure code quality and maintainability in your projects?
- Answer aloud and timed: Describe a challenging technical problem you solved in your previous work.
Final Round
reportedA final interview round with senior leadership to assess overall fit and alignment with company values.
What to demonstrate
- A final interview round with senior leadership to assess overall fit and alignment with company values
- Depth in Technical Interview Round
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: Design a system for managing patient records. What considerations would you include for data privacy and security?
- Answer aloud and timed: How would you approach scaling an application to handle increased user traffic?
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Research the company
Understanding Novant Health’s mission and values will help you align your responses during the interview.
Practice coding challenges
Use platforms like LeetCode or HackerRank to sharpen your coding skills and prepare for technical assessments.
Prepare for behavioral questions
Reflect on past experiences and be ready to discuss how you handled challenges, worked in teams, and contributed to projects.
Engage with interviewers
Ask thoughtful questions about the team, projects, and company culture to demonstrate your interest.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Solve a coding challenge focused on data structures. For example, how would you implement a stack or a queue?
Solve a coding challenge focused on data structures. For example, how would you implement a stack or a queue?
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Explain the difference between breadth-first search and depth-first search algorithms.
Explain the difference between breadth-first search and depth-first search algorithms.
Approach
- Restate the input: its shape, its size, and what is guaranteed about it.
- Name the brute-force solution and its complexity before improving on it.
- Choose the data structure from the access pattern, not from familiarity.
- State the target complexity and say which constraint rules the naive version out.
Follow-up
- How does this change if the input no longer fits in memory?
- What is the worst case, and how likely is it on real data?
Find overlapping job attempts and peak concurrency from lease records
A day of job_run history yields about 50,000,000 attempt records: (job_run_id, job_type, attempt, started_at, finished_at which is NULL when the worker died, lease_expires_at). Leases expire on a clock, so a job that outran its lease ran twice. Produce (a) every job_run_id whose attempts overlapped in wall-clock time and (b) the peak number of simultaneously running attempts per job_type with the minute it occurred. Target O(n log n). State how you treat a NULL finished_at and what clock skew does to your answer.
Approach
- Define the interval before sorting anything: an attempt occupies [started_at, COALESCE(finished_at, lease_expires_at)). finished_at is observed and lease_expires_at is only a promise, so every attempt without a finish contributes an estimate and the whole result is a lower bound on overlap rather than an exact count.
- For peak concurrency, sweep: emit 2n endpoints, sort by (timestamp, kind) with ends ordered before starts at equal timestamps, then walk the sequence maintaining a counter per job_type and record each type's maximum with its timestamp. O(n log n) dominated by the sort, O(n) space, or O(1) extra if the sort is external and the walk streams.
- For overlap detection, do not compare attempts pairwise. A single global sort by (job_run_id, started_at) gives both the grouping and the order; within a group, keep the maximum end seen so far and report an overlap exactly when the next start is less than that running maximum, which is one linear pass after the sort.
- Half-open intervals matter and are easy to get wrong: with closed intervals an attempt ending at the same millisecond another begins reads as concurrency two, and across 50,000,000 records that artefact swamps the real signal.
Follow-up
- A handler is not idempotent and you have found 400 overlapping jobs. Which of them actually caused damage, and what would you query to find out?
- Peak concurrency for one job_type is 4 against a configured cap of 4. Is the cap working, or is the data hiding attempts that never started?
Write the update path that detects a concurrent edit
resource carries version INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 1. resource_revision holds revision_id, resource_id, version, actor_user_id, change_kind, patch JSONB, request_id, created_at with UNIQUE (resource_id, version). outbox_event holds aggregate_type, aggregate_id, aggregate_version, event_type, payload, status. A PUT carries the version the client read. Write the exact statements for the single transaction that applies the edit, records the revision and enqueues 'resource.updated', and give the handler's branch on zero affected rows. Then say what PostgreSQL 16 does under READ COMMITTED when two of these updates hit one row at once.
Approach
- One transaction, three writes, no network call inside it: UPDATE resource SET title = $3, version = version + 1, updated_at = now() WHERE resource_id = $1 AND tenant_id = $4 AND version = $2; then INSERT the resource_revision row at version $2 + 1; then INSERT the outbox_event row at the same aggregate_version. The event goes to a table rather than a broker because no transaction spans both.
- Branch on the affected-row count before doing anything else. Zero has three causes — stale version, wrong tenant, row gone — so re-read once and map to 409 carrying the current version, or 404 for an id outside the caller's tenant, which also stops the endpoint confirming that another tenant's id exists.
- State the engine behaviour instead of assuming it. Under READ COMMITTED the second UPDATE blocks on the row lock, and when the first commits PostgreSQL re-evaluates the WHERE clause against the newly committed row, so the version predicate now fails and the statement reports zero rows. Under REPEATABLE READ the identical collision raises SQLSTATE 40001 instead, so the handler must fold both shapes into one conflict response.
- Keep UNIQUE (resource_id, version) even though the predicate already serialises writers. It is what makes a lost update unwritable if any other path ever reaches the revision table, and it converts a logic bug into 23505 rather than into a silently missing history row.
Follow-up
- A client sends the version it read ten minutes ago and the resource has moved three versions. What is in your 409 so it can resolve the conflict without a full re-fetch?
- Two editors, two disjoint fields, no overlap. Does your answer still refuse the second write, and should it?
Hold a per-tenant active cap against concurrent creates
A tenant on the standard plan may hold at most 50 resources with status='active'. The create handler runs SELECT count(*) FROM resource WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND status = 'active', compares to 50, then inserts. Two creates arrive 3 ms apart on different instances and the tenant lands at 51. Name the anomaly, say whether PostgreSQL 16 READ COMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ prevents it and why, then give an implementation that holds the cap at READ COMMITTED with the exact statements. Finally, say what changes when the cap is 'at most one running export per tenant' on job_run.
Approach
- Name it: write skew. The two transactions read an overlapping set and write disjoint rows, so there is no row-level conflict for the engine to detect and each commit is individually legal.
- Rule out the levels precisely. READ COMMITTED takes a fresh snapshot per statement and takes no lock on the counted rows, so both see 49. PostgreSQL's REPEATABLE READ is snapshot isolation: it removes non-repeatable reads and phantoms within the snapshot but still admits write skew, because the anomaly is not a re-read of a changed row, it is a read of a set that a concurrent transaction invalidates. Only SERIALIZABLE closes it, by tracking the read dependency and aborting one transaction with SQLSTATE 40001 — a guarantee that exists only if the application re-runs the whole transaction from the read.
- Convert the set predicate into a single-row conflict: keep tenant.active_resource_count and run UPDATE tenant SET active_resource_count = active_resource_count + 1 WHERE tenant_id = $1 AND active_resource_count < 50 in the same transaction as the INSERT. Zero affected rows is the cap, returned as 409. The row lock serialises the decision at any isolation level, and contention is bounded to one tenant's row — which is also the fair-scheduling unit, unlike a global counter that would convoy every tenant behind one row.
- State the cost you just took on: a counter is a second source of truth that can drift, so every path that changes status must adjust it inside the same transaction, and a periodic reconciliation has to exist, with resource_revision as the authority for what the count should have been.
Follow-up
- A resource moves from archived back to active. Which statements change, and what breaks if the counter update and the status change land in different transactions?
- The cap becomes plan-dependent and a plan can change mid-month. Where does the number 50 live, and who reads it?
Explain the concept of object-oriented programming (OOP) and its principles.
Explain the concept of object-oriented programming (OOP) and its principles.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How do you ensure code quality and maintainability in your projects?
How do you ensure code quality and maintainability in your projects?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Describe a challenging technical problem you solved in your previous work.
Describe a challenging technical problem you solved in your previous work.
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
Design a system for managing patient records. What considerations would you include for data privacy and secur
Design a system for managing patient records. What considerations would you include for data privacy and security?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
How would you approach scaling an application to handle increased user traffic?
How would you approach scaling an application to handle increased user traffic?
Approach
- Fix the scope first: who calls this, how often, and what they do when it fails.
- Name the read and write paths separately; they rarely have the same bottleneck.
- Choose a partition key and say what query it makes expensive.
- State the consistency you need, and where you are willing to be stale.
Follow-up
- What breaks first when traffic grows ten times?
- How does this behave when that dependency is down for an hour?
If tasked with improving an existing application, what steps would you take to assess its current performance?
If tasked with improving an existing application, what steps would you take to assess its current performance?
Approach
- Clarify what is being asked and what a complete answer contains.
- State your assumptions explicitly before working the problem.
- Say what you would check first and why it is the highest-information step.
- Work from the requirement backwards to the design.
Follow-up
- What assumption would you test first?
- How would you know your answer was wrong?
How would you approach debugging a system that is showing inconsistent results?
How would you approach debugging a system that is showing inconsistent results?
Approach
- Establish what changed and when, before forming any theory.
- Pick a bisection that eliminates candidates whichever way it turns out.
- Check the instrumentation before believing the symptom.
- Separate the trigger from the cause; the deploy is rarely the bug.
Follow-up
- What would you look at first, and what would it rule out?
- How would you tell a cause from a coincidence here?
Built from the rounds and topics Novant Health candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the Novant Health loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Technical Interviews, Final Round.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 3 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work Technical Interview Round
- Spend the session on Technical Interview Round, which Novant Health candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Technical Interview Round and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Technical Interview Round.
03Work Python
- Spend the session on Python, which Novant Health candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Python and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Python.
04Work Coding Interviews
- Spend the session on Coding Interviews, which Novant Health candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Coding Interviews and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Coding Interviews.
05Answer out loud: Technical / Domain Questions
- Answer aloud, timed: What is your experience with Java and Python? Can you provide examples of projects where you used these languages?
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain the concept of object-oriented programming (OOP) and its principles.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical / Domain Questions question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: System Design / Architecture
- Answer aloud, timed: Design a system for managing patient records. What considerations would you include for data privacy and security?
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you approach scaling an application to handle increased user traffic?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported System Design / Architecture question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Behavioral / Leadership
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a time when you had to work under pressure. How did you manage your time and priorities?
- Answer aloud, timed: Can you give an example of how you handled a conflict with a colleague?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral / Leadership question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
What is your experience with Java and Python? Can you provide examples of projects where you used these langua
What is your experience with Java and Python? Can you provide examples of projects where you used these languages?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Describe a time when you had to work under pressure. How did you manage your time and priorities?
Describe a time when you had to work under pressure. How did you manage your time and priorities?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
Can you give an example of how you handled a conflict with a colleague?
Can you give an example of how you handled a conflict with a colleague?
Approach
- Pick a story where you made the decision, not one where you watched it.
- State the situation in two sentences and spend the rest on the reasoning.
- Give the blast radius: what could have broken, and what you measured.
- Name the disagreement and how you resolved it with evidence.
Follow-up
- What would you do differently if you ran that again?
- How did you know your change caused the improvement?
- 01
What is your experience with Java and Python? Can you provide examples of projects where you used these languages?
- 02
Describe a time when you had to work under pressure. How did you manage your time and priorities?
- 03
Can you give an example of how you handled a conflict with a colleague?
How difficult is the interview process, and how much preparation time is typical?
The interview process can be challenging, often requiring several weeks of preparation. Candidates should allocate sufficient time to review technical concepts, practice coding problems, and prepare for behavioral discussions.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What differentiates successful candidates?
Successful candidates typically demonstrate a balance of strong technical skills and the ability to communicate effectively. Showing a passion for healthcare technology and a commitment to continuous learning can also set you apart.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the culture and working style at Novant Health?
The culture at Novant Health emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and a patient-first approach. Team dynamics are supportive, and employees are encouraged to share ideas and contribute to the organization’s mission.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What is the typical timeline from initial screen to offer?
The timeline can vary but generally ranges from a few weeks to a couple of months, depending on the number of interview rounds and team availability.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Are there remote work or hybrid expectations?
Novant Health has adopted flexible work arrangements, and many roles may offer hybrid work options, allowing for a blend of remote and in-office work.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does Novant Health test in interviews?
Novant Health interviews most often cover Problem Solving, Stakeholder Communication, Communication, Adaptability, and Stakeholder Management. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
No official company page is cited. Rounds and questions come from candidate reports and PracHub editorial material; each source shows the date it was read.
- 01Novant Health Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
Candidate reports · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
PracHub page · Accessed 2026-09-22