A Software Engineer at Opera Solutions plays a pivotal role in developing innovative software solutions that drive the company's mission of providing advanced analytics and decision-making tools. This position integrates complex algorithms with high-performance software engineering to deliver impactful products that empower clients to harness the full potential of their data. You will contribute to designing and implementing systems that can analyze large datasets efficiently, providing critical insights to businesses across various sectors. The role is not just about writing code; you will be part of a dynamic team that collaborates on projects that range from real-time data processing to machine learning applications. Your contributions will directly influence the performance and scalability of the products, making your work essential to the company’s strategic goals. Expect to engage with cutting-edge technologies and methodologies, as you help shape the future of data-driven decision-making at Opera Solutions.
Initial Screening
reportedThe first step involves an initial screening to assess candidate qualifications and fit.
What to demonstrate
- The first step involves an initial screening to assess candidate qualifications and fit
- Depth in SQL
How to prepare
- Be able to walk your CV end to end in two minutes, and say why this company specifically.
- Have your salary expectations, notice period and location constraints ready, and ask for the rest of the loop in writing.
Technical Assessment
reportedCandidates undergo technical assessments to evaluate their technical skills and problem-solving abilities.
What to demonstrate
- Candidates undergo technical assessments to evaluate their technical skills and problem-solving abilities
- Depth in SQL
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How do you handle memory management in your applications?
- Answer aloud and timed: Describe the principles of Object-Oriented Programming.
Behavioral Interview
reportedA behavioral interview is conducted to assess cultural fit and collaboration skills.
What to demonstrate
- A behavioral interview is conducted to assess cultural fit and collaboration skills
- Depth in SQL
How to prepare
- Prepare three examples from your own work, each with a decision you made and an outcome you can quantify.
- Re-read the description of the behavioral interview above and write down what you would ask to confirm before it.
Multiple Rounds of Interviews
reportedCandidates participate in multiple rounds of interviews with different stakeholders.
What to demonstrate
- Candidates participate in multiple rounds of interviews with different stakeholders
- Depth in SQL
How to prepare
- Answer aloud and timed: How would you find the longest substring without repeating characters?
- Answer aloud and timed: Implement a binary search algorithm.
PracHub editorial advice for the preparation topics above.
Going into the loop without having done this.
Practice coding regularly: Regular coding practice will help you refine your skills and improve your problem-solving speed.
Going into the loop without having done this.
Understand the company’s products: Familiarize yourself with the solutions offered by Opera Solutions to speak knowledgeably during interviews.
Going into the loop without having done this.
Prepare for behavioral questions: Reflect on your past experiences and prepare stories that highlight your teamwork, adaptability, and communication skills.
Going into the loop without having done this.
Expect the interview questions to be challenging, and do not underestimate the need for thorough preparation.
Choose a category, try a prompt, then open its approach, worked solution or follow-up when you need it.
Write a function to reverse a linked list.
Write a function to reverse a linked list.
Approach
- Assume a singly linked list of nodes with
valandnext, and return the new head. The insight: walk the list once and point each node'snextbackward, holding three references:prev,curr, and the savednxt. - Each iteration saves
nxt = curr.next, setscurr.next = prev, then advancesprev = currandcurr = nxt. WhencurrbecomesNone,previs the new head. Forgetting to savenextbefore overwriting it loses the rest of the list. - The iterative version is O(n) time and O(1) extra space. A recursive version (reverse the rest, then
head.next.next = headandhead.next = None) is also O(n) time but uses O(n) stack, which hits Python's recursion limit on long lists. - Test the edges: an empty list (
None), one node, two nodes. Confirm the old head'snextends upNone; leaving it pointing at its old neighbor creates a cycle.
Worked solution 10 min
Iterative in-place pointer reversal
- Define a minimal
ListNodeclass plusfrom_listandto_listhelpers so results are easy to check. - Start with
prev = Noneandcurr = head; that initialNonebecomes the new tail'snext. - Rewire exactly one node per loop iteration and return
prevoncecurrruns off the end. - Trace
1 -> 2 -> 3: after each iteration the reversed prefix is1, then2 -> 1, then3 -> 2 -> 1.
class ListNode:
def __init__(self, val=0, next=None):
self.val = val
self.next = next
def reverse_list(head):
"""Reverse a singly linked list in place and return the new head."""
prev, curr = None, head
while curr:
nxt = curr.next # save the rest before breaking the link
curr.next = prev # flip this node's pointer backward
prev, curr = curr, nxt
return prev # prev is the old tail, now the head
def from_list(values):
head = None
for v in reversed(values):
head = ListNode(v, head)
return head
def to_list(head):
out = []
while head:
out.append(head.val)
head = head.next
return out
Scroll sideways to view long lines.
Follow-up
- How would you reverse a doubly linked list? Swap each node's
prevandnextpointers in one pass and return the last node visited as the new head. - How would you reverse only positions m through n? Walk to the node before m, reverse n - m + 1 nodes with the same loop, then reconnect both ends of the reversed segment.
- How would you reverse in groups of k? Reverse each full block of k with the same loop, link the previous block's tail to the new block head, and leave a final short block as is.
How would you find the longest substring without repeating characters?
How would you find the longest substring without repeating characters?
Approach
- Interpret it as: return the length (and the substring itself) of the longest contiguous run with all distinct characters. Checking every substring is O(n^2) or worse; a sliding window does it in one O(n) pass.
- Keep a window
[left, right]that never contains a repeat, and a dictlast_seenmapping each character to its latest index. Advancerightone character at a time. - If
s[right]was last seen at an index>= left, movelefttolast_seen[s[right]] + 1. The>= leftguard is the classic bug: without it, a stale index from before the window (as in'abba') dragsleftbackward. - After each step, record
last_seen[s[right]] = rightand update the best length withright - left + 1. Time is O(n); space is O(min(n, k)) for an alphabet of k characters. - Edge cases to run:
''gives 0,'bbbb'gives 1, a fully distinct string gives its length, and'abba'gives 2, which catches the backward-jump bug.
Worked solution 15 min
Sliding window with a last-seen index map
- Scan the string once with
right, keepingleftat the start of the current repeat-free window. - On a repeat inside the window, move
leftdirectly past the earlier occurrence instead of shrinking one step at a time. - Save the window's start whenever it sets a new best length, so the substring can be returned along with its length.
- Trace
'abcabcbb': the window moves through'abc','bca','cab','abc'and never exceeds length 3.
def longest_unique_substring(s):
"""Return (length, substring) of the longest run with no repeated character."""
last_seen = {} # char -> most recent index
left = best_len = best_start = 0
for right, ch in enumerate(s):
# Jump only if the earlier occurrence is inside the current window.
if ch in last_seen and last_seen[ch] >= left:
left = last_seen[ch] + 1
last_seen[ch] = right
if right - left + 1 > best_len:
best_len, best_start = right - left + 1, left
return best_len, s[best_start:best_start + best_len]
Scroll sideways to view long lines.
Follow-up
- What if up to k distinct characters are allowed? Keep a count map for the window and shrink
leftwhile it holds more than k keys; still O(n). - If input is ASCII, can you drop the dict? Use a 128-slot array of last indices initialized to -1; the logic is identical and the extra space is constant.
- How would you return every longest substring? Collect each window start that ties the best length, and reset the list when a strictly longer window appears.
Implement a binary search algorithm.
Implement a binary search algorithm.
Approach
- Binary search finds a target in a sorted array by comparing it with the middle element and discarding the half that cannot contain it. That gives O(log n) time and, written iteratively, O(1) space.
- Pick one interval convention and stick to it. Inclusive bounds:
lo, hi = 0, len(a) - 1, loopwhile lo <= hi, thenlo = mid + 1orhi = mid - 1. Mixinghi = len(a)with<=is the classic off-by-one. - Compute
mid = lo + (hi - lo) // 2. Python integers never overflow, but explain the habit:(lo + hi) / 2can overflow 32-bit integers in Java or C++. - Return
-1or the insertion point when the target is absent. If duplicates matter, write the lower-bound variant, which keeps narrowing left after a match to find the first occurrence. - Edge cases: an empty array, one element, a target below the minimum or above the maximum, a target at index 0 or the last index, and runs of duplicates.
Worked solution 10 min
Iterative binary search plus lower bound
- Write
binary_searchwith inclusive bounds; it returns any index that holds the target, or-1. - Write
lower_boundover the half-open range[lo, hi); it returns the first index whose value is>= target, which is also the insertion point. - Answer first-occurrence questions with
lower_bound: the target is present only if that index is in range and holds the target. - Trace
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]for 7:mid = 2holds 5, which is less, solo = 3;mid = 3holds 7 and returns 3.
def binary_search(a, target):
"""Return an index of target in sorted list a, or -1 if absent."""
lo, hi = 0, len(a) - 1 # inclusive bounds
while lo <= hi:
mid = lo + (hi - lo) // 2
if a[mid] == target:
return mid
if a[mid] < target:
lo = mid + 1
else:
hi = mid - 1
return -1
def lower_bound(a, target):
"""Return the first index i with a[i] >= target (len(a) if none)."""
lo, hi = 0, len(a) # half-open range [lo, hi)
while lo < hi:
mid = lo + (hi - lo) // 2
if a[mid] < target:
lo = mid + 1
else:
hi = mid
return lo
Scroll sideways to view long lines.
Follow-up
- How do you search a rotated sorted array? At each step one half around
midis sorted; check whether the target falls in that half's range and drop the other half. Still O(log n) with distinct values. - Where else does binary search apply? On any monotonic yes/no predicate, such as the smallest ship capacity that delivers all packages in D days, by searching the answer range.
- Recursive or iterative? Both are O(log n) time, but recursion adds O(log n) stack frames; the loop is simpler and avoids call overhead.
Solve a problem involving dynamic programming, such as the knapsack problem.
Solve a problem involving dynamic programming, such as the knapsack problem.
Approach
- Solve 0/1 knapsack: given weights, values, and capacity
W, take each item at most once to maximize total value. Say up front that greedy by value-to-weight ratio fails here; it is only optimal for the fractional version. - State:
dp[i][w]is the best value using the firstiitems with capacityw. Recurrence:dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], dp[i-1][w - wt_i] + val_i)whenwt_i <= w, with row 0 all zeros. - To save memory, keep one array of size
W + 1and loop capacity downward fromWtowt_iso each item counts once; looping upward silently solves unbounded knapsack instead. That is O(n·W) time and O(W) space. - To report which items were chosen, keep the full table and walk back from
dp[n][W]: wheneverdp[i][w] != dp[i-1][w], itemiwas taken, so subtract its weight and continue. - Mention that O(n·W) is pseudo-polynomial: it grows with the numeric value of
W, which is exponential in the bits needed to writeW, so this DP does not contradict 0/1 knapsack being NP-hard. Edge cases: capacity 0, no items, items heavier thanW, zero-weight items.
Worked solution 25 min
0/1 knapsack table with item recovery
- Allocate an
(n + 1) x (W + 1)table of zeros; rowiconsiders only the firstiitems. - Fill it row by row: start from the value without item
i, and if the item fits, compare with taking it on top of the previous row's best atw - weight. - Backtrack from
dp[n][W]to collect the chosen indices, then reverse them into ascending order. - Keep
knapsack_valueas the O(W)-memory version for when only the best total is needed.
def knapsack(weights, values, capacity):
"""0/1 knapsack: return (best_value, sorted indices of chosen items)."""
n = len(weights)
dp = [[0] * (capacity + 1) for _ in range(n + 1)]
for i in range(1, n + 1):
wt, val = weights[i - 1], values[i - 1]
for w in range(capacity + 1):
dp[i][w] = dp[i - 1][w] # skip item i-1
if wt <= w: # or take it
dp[i][w] = max(dp[i][w], dp[i - 1][w - wt] + val)
chosen, w = [], capacity # walk back through the table
for i in range(n, 0, -1):
if dp[i][w] != dp[i - 1][w]:
chosen.append(i - 1)
w -= weights[i - 1]
return dp[n][capacity], chosen[::-1]
def knapsack_value(weights, values, capacity):
"""Same answer in O(W) memory (value only)."""
dp = [0] * (capacity + 1)
for wt, val in zip(weights, values):
for w in range(capacity, wt - 1, -1): # downward: each item used once
dp[w] = max(dp[w], dp[w - wt] + val)
return dp[capacity]
Scroll sideways to view long lines.
Follow-up
- How does unbounded knapsack change the code? Items can repeat, so iterate capacity upward in the 1D array, or read
dp[i][w - wt]from the current row. - What if W is huge but values are small? Flip the state:
dp[v]is the minimum weight that reaches valuev; answer with the largestvwhose weight fits, in O(n·sum(values)). - Could you write it top-down? Memoize
best(i, w)withfunctools.lru_cache; it has the same O(n·W) states but only visits reachable ones, with recursion depth O(n).
Explain various database normalization forms.
Explain various database normalization forms.
Approach
- Normalization stores each fact once to prevent update, insert, and delete anomalies. Walk the forms in order, since each adds one constraint on top of the previous form, and use one running example so the definitions stay concrete.
- 1NF: every column holds a single atomic value, with no repeating groups such as
phone1, phone2, phone3columns or comma-separated lists, and every row is identifiable by a key. - 2NF: 1NF plus no partial dependency, so every non-key column depends on the whole composite key. In
order_items(order_id, product_id, qty, product_name),product_namedepends only onproduct_id, so it moves to aproductstable. - 3NF: 2NF plus no transitive dependency, so non-key columns depend on the key directly and on nothing else. In
employees(emp_id, dept_id, dept_name),dept_namedepends onemp_idonly throughdept_id(emp_id -> dept_id -> dept_name), so it moves todepartments. - BCNF: every determinant must be a superkey, which closes the 3NF gap where a non-superkey determines part of a candidate key (possible only when candidate keys overlap). 4NF separates independent multi-valued facts (a person's skills and languages); 5NF handles join dependencies.
- Close with the tradeoff: normalize transactional schemas to 3NF or BCNF for write integrity, and denormalize on purpose (star schemas, precomputed aggregates) for read-heavy analytics, since every extra join costs read latency.
Follow-up
- When would you denormalize? When joins dominate read latency in reporting or read-heavy paths; treat the copy as derived data and keep it in sync with triggers, batch rebuilds, or change events.
- Can a table be in 3NF but not BCNF? Yes: in
(student, course, instructor)with(student, course) -> instructorandinstructor -> course, every column is in a key, so 3NF holds, butinstructorisn't a superkey. - What is a functional dependency?
A -> Bmeans any two rows with the sameAvalue must have the sameBvalue; every normal form is defined in terms of these.
How would you approach optimizing a slow-running database query?
How would you approach optimizing a slow-running database query?
Approach
- Measure before changing anything: capture the exact query, its parameters, and timing, then read the plan with
EXPLAIN ANALYZE(PostgreSQL, MySQL 8.0.18+). Look for full scans on big tables, estimated versus actual row counts far apart, and which node takes the time. - Give the predicates an index that matches them:
(customer_id, created_at)servesWHERE customer_id = ? AND created_at > ?because equality columns go first and the range column last. Add the selected columns to make it covering when that avoids table lookups. - Make predicates sargable: wrapping an indexed column in a function (
DATE(created_at) = ...,LOWER(email) = ...), a leading-wildcardLIKE '%x', or an implicit type cast blocks index use. Rewrite as a range or add an expression index. - Check the query's shape:
SELECT *pulling unused columns, N+1 queries from the application, deepOFFSETpagination (switch to keyset), correlated subqueries, and joins that multiply rows only forDISTINCTto remove them. - If the plan looks wrong, refresh statistics (
ANALYZE) since stale stats mislead the planner, and rule out lock waits, which look like slowness but aren't query cost. Beyond that: summary tables or materialized views, partitioning by date, or caching results. - Verify on production-like data volumes and compare before and after. Every index slows writes and uses storage, so justify each one by the plan it changes rather than adding indexes by guesswork.
Follow-up
- Why would the planner ignore your new index? The predicate matches too many rows so a scan is cheaper, statistics are stale, or a function or type mismatch makes the predicate non-sargable.
- Why is keyset pagination faster than OFFSET?
WHERE (created_at, id) < (?, ?) ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC LIMIT 50seeks through the index instead of reading and discarding every skipped row. - The query is fast alone but slow in production. Why? Look for lock contention, connection pool saturation, a cold cache under concurrency, or a cached plan built for an unrepresentative parameter value.
Discuss the trade-offs between SQL and NoSQL databases in a specific scenario.
Discuss the trade-offs between SQL and NoSQL databases in a specific scenario.
Approach
- The question wants a specific scenario, so choose one and decide. E.g. an online store: orders, payments, and inventory versus the product catalog, sessions, and activity feed, a split that lets you argue both sides.
- SQL databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL) give ACID transactions across rows and tables, an enforced schema with foreign keys, and flexible ad-hoc queries with joins. Use one for orders, payments, and inventory, where creating an order and decrementing stock must commit together.
- NoSQL is several models: key-value (Redis, DynamoDB) for sessions and carts, document stores (MongoDB) for catalog items whose attributes vary by category, wide-column (Cassandra) for high-write activity events, and graph databases for relationship queries.
- The real tradeoff is access patterns and consistency, not raw speed. NoSQL stores scale out by partition key and are fast for queries known in advance, but you model tables around those queries, do joins in application code, and get limited cross-partition transactions.
- Correct two misconceptions: relational databases scale further than assumed (read replicas, partitioning, distributed SQL engines), and several NoSQL stores now support multi-item transactions, with limits on scope and throughput. Using both adds operational cost, so justify each store.
Follow-up
- How would you model the activity feed in Cassandra? Partition by
user_idplus a time bucket and cluster by timestamp descending, so the latest events are one bounded partition read. - What does eventual consistency mean for a cart? A read right after a write may hit a replica that lacks it; use quorum reads and writes or session affinity when users must see their own writes.
- Would you ever put orders in NoSQL? Only if access is by
order_idwithin one partition and you accept enforcing cross-entity rules like stock limits in application code.
What is the difference between a process and a thread?
What is the difference between a process and a thread?
Approach
- A process is a running program with its own virtual address space, file-descriptor table, and OS resources. A thread is a unit of execution inside a process with its own stack, registers, and program counter, sharing the process's heap, globals, code, and open files.
- Isolation is the core contrast: a wild pointer or crash in one process cannot corrupt another process's memory, but a faulty thread can take down every thread in its process. Processes talk through IPC (pipes, sockets, shared-memory segments); threads just read and write shared memory.
- Processes are heavier:
forkmust set up new address-space mappings (copy-on-write), and switching processes changes page tables, which can flush the TLB. Threads share one address space, so creating and switching them is cheaper. On Linux both come fromclonewith different sharing flags. - Shared memory is why threads need synchronization (mutexes, atomics, condition variables) and why they suffer races and deadlocks. Processes avoid most of that but pay copy and serialization costs whenever they exchange data.
- Use processes for fault isolation, security boundaries, or CPU-bound work under a global lock like default CPython's GIL; use threads for I/O-bound concurrency or tightly shared state. Calling a thread 'a lightweight process' is not enough: say what is shared and what is private.
Follow-up
- What does each thread keep private? Its stack, registers, program counter, and thread-local storage; the heap, globals, code, and file descriptors are shared with sibling threads.
- What happens if you call
forkin a multithreaded program? Only the calling thread exists in the child, so locks held by other threads can stay locked forever; callexecright away or only async-signal-safe functions. - How do coroutines differ from threads? The runtime schedules them cooperatively in user space, so switching is cheap, but one blocking call stalls every coroutine sharing that OS thread.
How do you handle memory management in your applications?
How do you handle memory management in your applications?
Approach
- Split the answer by runtime, because the mechanics differ. In C, C++, and Rust you control object lifetimes; in garbage-collected languages (Java, Go, Python, C#) the runtime frees unreachable objects, and your job becomes limiting allocation and not holding references you no longer need.
- In C++, tie every resource to a scope with RAII:
std::unique_ptrfor single ownership,std::shared_ptronly for truly shared ownership, andstd::weak_ptrto break reference cycles. Rawnew/deletein application code is a red flag. - Leaks still happen under a GC: objects kept reachable by accident, such as unbounded caches, static collections, listeners never unregistered, or closures holding large objects. Bound caches with a max size or LRU eviction, and release resources with
try-with-resources,with, ordefer. - Measure before tuning: track heap size over time, then take two heap snapshots minutes apart (
jmapplus a heap analyzer,tracemalloc,pprof) and diff them to see what accumulates. For native code, run tests under AddressSanitizer or Valgrind. - For data-heavy services, cut allocation pressure: stream records instead of loading whole datasets, reuse buffers on hot paths, prefer compact layouts (primitive arrays, columnar formats), and set container memory limits and GC settings from measured peak usage.
- Anchor the answer with one incident you actually handled: the symptom (e.g. memory climbing steadily until the process was OOM-killed), how you found what was holding the memory, and the fix. Saying 'the garbage collector takes care of it' ignores leaks from objects that stay reachable.
Follow-up
- Can a Python program leak memory? Yes: objects live as long as something references them (module-level caches, stored tracebacks), and C extensions can leak memory the interpreter never tracks.
- Stack versus heap allocation? Stack memory is freed automatically when the function returns and is fast but small; heap memory outlives the call and is freed by its owner or the GC.
- How do you tell a leak from a large working set? A leak keeps growing under steady load and survives full collections; a working set levels off. Compare snapshots taken under the same traffic.
Describe the principles of Object-Oriented Programming.
Describe the principles of Object-Oriented Programming.
Approach
- Name the four principles (encapsulation, abstraction, inheritance, polymorphism), define each precisely, and give a concrete example of each, since the definitions blur together without one, especially encapsulation versus abstraction.
- Encapsulation bundles data with the methods that act on it and hides internal state behind a public interface, so invariants (e.g. a balance never goes negative) are enforced in one place. It is about protecting invariants, not about adding a getter and setter to every field.
- Abstraction exposes what an object does, not how: callers use
Storage.save()without knowing whether it writes to local disk or S3. Encapsulation hides state; abstraction hides implementation complexity behind a simpler model. - Inheritance lets a subclass reuse and extend a base class (an is-a relationship). Polymorphism lets code written against a base type work with any subtype, with the call dispatched at runtime to the override; method overloading is the compile-time form.
- Show judgment beyond definitions: prefer composition to deep hierarchies, because inheritance couples subclasses to parent internals (the fragile base class problem). Cite Liskov substitution, meaning a subtype must work anywhere its parent does, and the
Square extends Rectangleviolation.
Follow-up
- Abstract class or interface? In Java or C#, a class extends one abstract class, which can hold state, but implements many interfaces (Java 8+ allows default methods, not instance fields). C++ and Python allow multiple abstract bases.
- Why does
Square extends Rectanglebreak Liskov substitution? Code that sets width and height independently gets surprising areas when aSquareforces them equal, so the subtype isn't substitutable. - When is composition better than inheritance? When behaviors vary independently or change at runtime: inject a strategy object rather than creating a subclass for every combination.
Can you explain the concept of RESTful APIs and how they work?
Can you explain the concept of RESTful APIs and how they work?
Approach
- REST is an architectural style, defined in Roy Fielding's dissertation, in which everything is a resource identified by a URI and manipulated through a uniform interface (in practice HTTP methods), with representations such as JSON passed between client and server.
- Map methods to meaning:
GET /orders/42reads,POST /orderscreates,PUT /orders/42replaces,PATCHupdates part of it,DELETEremoves it.GETis safe (the client requests no state change, though the server may still log it);GET,PUT, andDELETEare idempotent,POSTis not. - Key constraints: statelessness (each request carries everything needed, such as an auth token, so any server can handle it), client-server separation, cacheability via
Cache-ControlandETag, a layered system, and the uniform interface. Statelessness is what makes horizontal scaling simple. - Use status codes correctly:
200,201 Createdwith aLocationheader,204 No Content,400for bad input,401unauthenticated versus403forbidden,404,409conflict,429rate-limited,5xxfor server faults. Returning200with an error in the body is a common weak spot. - Round it off with practical design: plural nouns and nesting (
/users/7/orders), cursor pagination, filtering through query parameters, versioning (/v1/or a header), and idempotency keys for retriedPOSTs. Most APIs called REST skip HATEOAS, the hypermedia constraint.
Follow-up
- PUT or PATCH?
PUTreplaces the whole resource and is idempotent;PATCHsends a partial change and is idempotent only if the patch sets values rather than, say, incrementing them. - How do you make a POST safe to retry? The client sends an
Idempotency-Keyheader; the server stores the key with the first result and returns that stored response for any repeat. - REST or GraphQL? GraphQL uses one endpoint where the client picks fields, avoiding over- and under-fetching, but HTTP caching is harder and the server must limit query cost.
Explain how you would design a system to detect duplicate emails from a large dataset.
Explain how you would design a system to detect duplicate emails from a large dataset.
Approach
- Clarify first: duplicate email addresses across records, or near-duplicate email messages? Answer the address case, and assume the data is too big for one machine's memory (say 5 billion rows, about 200 GB).
- Normalize before comparing or you miss duplicates: trim whitespace and lowercase the domain. The local part is technically case-sensitive under RFC 5321 but most providers ignore case, so state your rule; apply alias rules (dots,
+tagsuffixes) only for domains known to treat them as aliases. - If it fits in memory, one pass with a hash set of normalized keys finds duplicates in O(n). If not, hash-partition by
hash(normalized_email) % Pso every copy of an address lands in the same partition, then dedupe each partition independently (a SparkgroupBy, or external sort then scan). - Output groups, not just a yes/no:
(normalized_email, [record_ids])for every key with count > 1, plus a survivorship rule deciding which record to keep (most recent, most complete) and how to merge the rest. - For new records arriving continuously, check each against a persistent exact index, such as a unique constraint or a key-value store. A Bloom filter in front cheaply confirms 'definitely new', but it has false positives, so verify any hit against the exact store.
- Name the tradeoffs: exact hashing is precise but memory-hungry, Bloom filters save memory at the cost of false positives, and near-duplicate message bodies need shingling with MinHash and LSH rather than exact hashes. Watch for skew: one very common address can overload a partition.
Follow-up
- How would you find near-duplicate email bodies? Shingle each body into k-grams, compute MinHash signatures, and use LSH banding so only likely-similar pairs get an exact Jaccard comparison.
- How much memory does a Bloom filter need for 1 billion keys at a 1% false-positive rate? About 9.6 bits per key, roughly 1.2 GB, with 7 hash functions.
- How would you validate the dedup result? Sample flagged groups for manual review, spot-check non-flagged pairs with the same domain, and track the duplicate rate over time for sudden jumps.
Discuss how you would design a system for real-time data processing.
Discuss how you would design a system for real-time data processing.
Approach
- Pin down requirements: which events (e.g. clicks or transactions), which outputs (per-minute aggregates, alerts, enriched records), the latency target (say under 2 seconds end to end), and delivery guarantees. Assume a peak of about 100k events per second for sizing.
- Pipeline: producers write to a partitioned log (Kafka, Kinesis); a stream processor (Flink, Kafka Streams, Spark Structured Streaming) consumes it; results go to a serving store (Redis, Cassandra) and object storage for history. Partition by a key like
user_idso its state stays on one worker. - Handle time explicitly: aggregate on event time in tumbling, sliding, or session windows, use watermarks to decide when a window is complete, and set a policy for late events (allowed lateness, a side output, or a downstream correction).
- Choose delivery semantics: at-least-once with idempotent sinks (upserts keyed by event ID) is the simplest correct option; exactly-once needs processor checkpoints coordinated with transactional sinks. Checkpoint operator state durably so a restarted worker resumes rather than starting over.
- Plan for failure and load: consumer lag is the key health metric; scale consumers or partitions ahead of peaks, apply backpressure instead of dropping data, send malformed events to a dead-letter queue, and replay from the log to recompute after a bug fix.
- Name the deciding tradeoff: micro-batching gives higher throughput and simpler recovery at a latency cost, while per-event streaming gets lower latency with harder state management. A Lambda architecture adds a batch path for corrections; Kappa reprocesses from the log instead.
Follow-up
- How do you handle a hot key? Split it with a salt (
user_id#n) so partial aggregates spread across workers, then combine the partials in a second stage. - How would you join the stream with a slowly changing reference table? Load it into processor state from a changelog or broadcast stream, and version rows by event time so late events join the version valid when they happened.
- How many Kafka partitions at 100k events per second? Divide peak rate by one consumer's throughput (at 5k per second, 20) and add headroom, since adding partitions later remaps keys and breaks per-key ordering.
Design an algorithm for a recommendation system based on user behavior.
Design an algorithm for a recommendation system based on user behavior.
Approach
- Clarify what is recommended (products, articles), what behavior is logged (views, clicks, purchases, dwell time), and scale; assume 10M users and 1M items. Clicks are implicit, noisy feedback, so weight signals, e.g. purchase above add-to-cart above click above view.
- Baseline: item-to-item collaborative filtering. Count how often pairs of items are used by the same users, normalize with cosine similarity to damp popular items, and recommend the top neighbors of each user's recent items.
- Stronger at scale: matrix factorization (ALS for implicit feedback) or a two-tower model that learns user and item embeddings, retrieving candidates with approximate nearest-neighbor search over item vectors.
- Use two stages: candidate generation (a few hundred items from collaborative filtering, embeddings, popularity, recency), then a ranking model scoring them on user history, item attributes, and context. Compute similarities offline in batch and update recent-activity features in near real time.
- Handle cold start: new users get trending items or picks based on onboarding choices; new items rely on content similarity (category, text embeddings) until they gather interactions. Filter out items the user already bought.
- Evaluate offline on a time-based split (precision@k, recall@k, NDCG) and online with an A/B test on click-through or conversion. Watch for feedback loops that keep boosting already-popular items, and reserve some traffic for exploration.
Follow-up
- Why not user-user collaborative filtering? With millions of users, pairwise user similarity is expensive and shifts as behavior changes; item-item similarities are fewer, more stable, and easy to precompute.
- How do you serve recommendations in under 100 ms? Precompute candidates or embeddings offline, keep them in a key-value store with an ANN index, and run only lightweight ranking per request.
- How do you avoid recommending only popular items? Penalize popularity in the similarity score, add diversity constraints when re-ranking, and set aside a few slots for exploration.
Design a URL shortening service like bit.ly. What considerations would you have?
Design a URL shortening service like bit.ly. What considerations would you have?
Approach
- Scope the API:
POST /urls {long_url, custom_alias?, expires_at?}returns a short code, andGET /{code}redirects. Assume 100M new URLs a month and about 100 reads per write, so optimize for reads. Seven base62 characters give 62^7, about 3.5 trillion codes. - Code generation: encode a counter in base62 (a database sequence, or ID ranges pre-allocated to each server to avoid a single bottleneck), which never collides but yields guessable codes; or use random or hashed codes with a uniqueness check on insert and a retry on collision.
- Data model:
urls(code PRIMARY KEY, long_url, user_id, created_at, expires_at)in a key-value or sharded store keyed bycode. Every redirect is a point lookup, so no joins; add an index on a hash oflong_urlonly if repeat submissions should reuse a code. - Read path: cache hot codes in Redis and at the CDN, since traffic is heavily skewed. Choose 301 (permanent, browsers cache it, less load but repeat clicks go uncounted) or 302 (temporary, every click reaches you, better analytics).
- Record analytics without slowing redirects: publish a click event (code, timestamp, referrer, country) asynchronously to a queue and aggregate it in a stream or batch job, instead of updating a counter row on every redirect.
- Cover abuse and reliability: rate-limit creation per user or IP, scan submitted URLs for malware and phishing, expire links via TTL or a cleanup job, and replicate the store across zones so redirects survive a node failure.
Follow-up
- How do you avoid collisions with hashed codes? Take a prefix of the hash, insert under a uniqueness constraint, and on conflict retry with a salt or a longer prefix.
- How would you support custom aliases? Validate characters and block reserved words, insert under the same uniqueness constraint, and return a conflict error if the alias is taken.
- How would you shard the data? Hash-partition by
code, since every read is a lookup by code; consistent hashing lets you add nodes while moving only a fraction of keys.
How would you architect a distributed system for processing large volumes of data?
How would you architect a distributed system for processing large volumes of data?
Approach
- Clarify volume, freshness, and outputs: e.g. 10 TB a day of logs or transactions, feeding daily reports and ML features, with results due within hours. That points to a batch-first design; add a streaming path only where freshness demands it.
- Land raw data first: write it to object storage (S3, GCS) as immutable files partitioned by date, through a message queue for event data. Because raw data is never modified, any downstream job can be rerun from it.
- Process with a distributed engine such as Spark: data is split into partitions that executors process in parallel, with shuffles for joins and aggregations. Store in columnar formats (Parquet, ORC) partitioned by date so jobs read only the columns and days they need.
- Plan for skew, since the slowest partition sets job time: salt hot keys or broadcast the small side of a join, avoid floods of tiny files, and aim for partitions around 100-200 MB. Scale compute separately from storage, using autoscaling or spot capacity for batch work.
- Make it reliable: every job idempotent (overwrite the output partition for its date rather than appending), dependencies and retries managed by an orchestrator such as Airflow, and data-quality checks (row counts, null rates, schema) before results are published.
- State the tradeoffs: batch is cheaper and simpler but stale, streaming is fresh but harder to get right. Over time these systems break on schema changes, lineage, and backfills, so version schemas and record which job produced each dataset.
Follow-up
- How do you backfill a year of history after changing the transformation logic? Rerun the idempotent daily job per date partition in parallel batches from raw storage, write to a new table version, and switch readers after validation.
- How do you keep readers from seeing a half-written partition? Write to a staging location and commit atomically, through a table format such as Iceberg or Delta Lake or a partition-location swap in the metastore.
- Why columnar storage? Analytic queries read a few columns across many rows; columnar files skip unused columns, compress well, and keep min/max stats that let readers skip row groups.
Explain how you would ensure high availability in a cloud-based architecture.
Explain how you would ensure high availability in a cloud-based architecture.
Approach
- Set the target first: an availability SLO (99.9% allows about 8.8 hours of downtime a year, 99.99% about 53 minutes) plus RTO and RPO for data. Each extra nine costs much more, so set targets per service.
- Remove single points of failure: run stateless services in at least two or three availability zones behind a load balancer with health checks, inside auto-scaling groups, so failed instances are replaced and traffic moves away from a failed zone automatically.
- Make data survive failures: a managed database with a synchronous standby in another zone and automatic failover, read replicas for load, backups whose restores you actually test, and asynchronous cross-region replication for disaster recovery, accepting some data loss (RPO above zero).
- Design code for partial failure: timeouts, retries with backoff and jitter, circuit breakers, bulkheads that isolate resource pools, and graceful degradation such as serving cached or reduced results when a dependency is down. Queues decouple producers from slow consumers.
- Most outages come from changes, so control them: canary or blue-green deploys with fast rollback, infrastructure as code, alerts on SLO burn rate, and regular failover drills or chaos tests.
- The deciding tradeoff: multi-region active-active gives the highest availability but brings write conflicts and consistency problems; active-passive is simpler, but failover takes minutes. Failover you have never tested can't be counted on.
Follow-up
- What is the availability of a service with two hard dependencies at 99.9% each? Roughly 0.999 x 0.999 x its own, so under 99.8%; serial dependencies multiply unless you degrade gracefully.
- How can health checks cause an outage? A deep check that includes a shared dependency marks every instance unhealthy at once; keep liveness checks shallow and fail open when all targets look down.
- How do you handle writes in active-active regions? Route each user's writes to a home region, or use a multi-region store with a conflict policy such as last-writer-wins or CRDTs.
Describe how you would design a logging framework for a microservices architecture.
Describe how you would design a logging framework for a microservices architecture.
Approach
- Requirements: every service logs consistently, engineers can search one request's logs across all services within seconds, and logging can never take a service down. Assume about 200 services and 1 TB of logs a day to size storage and retention.
- Standardize at the source with a shared library: structured JSON with fixed fields (
timestampin UTC,level,service,env,host,trace_id,span_id,message) written to stdout. The library enforces the schema so services can't drift. - Correlate requests: create or accept a trace ID at the edge, propagate it in headers (W3C
traceparent) through every hop including message queues, and stamp it on every log line so one query returns the whole request path. - Pipeline: a node-level agent (Fluent Bit, Vector, or the OpenTelemetry Collector) tails container output, adds metadata such as pod and version, and ships to a Kafka buffer, then into Elasticsearch/OpenSearch or Loki for search; older logs go to object storage.
- Protect the services: log asynchronously through bounded buffers that drop or sample when full instead of blocking request threads, filter by level, sample noisy debug output, and rate-limit log storms from a single failure.
- Govern it: redact secrets and personal data in the library before logs leave the process, set retention tiers (e.g. 14 days searchable, a year archived), restrict access, and alert on the pipeline's own health, such as agent lag and dropped-log counts.
Follow-up
- Why buffer through Kafka instead of shipping straight to the index? It absorbs spikes and index outages without losing logs, and lets several consumers (search, security, archive) read the same stream.
- Logs, metrics, or traces? Metrics for cheap aggregate alerting, traces for request flow and latency breakdown, logs for per-event detail; link all three through the trace ID.
- How do you control log storage cost? Drop or sample debug logs in production, index only key fields, shorten hot retention, and move older logs to compressed object storage.
What steps would you take to troubleshoot a performance issue in a distributed system?
What steps would you take to troubleshoot a performance issue in a distributed system?
Approach
- Define the symptom precisely: which endpoint or job, which metric (p99 latency, throughput, error rate), since when, and for whom (everyone, one region, one tenant). Then check what changed around that time: deploys, config, traffic, dependencies.
- Mitigate before root-causing if users are affected: roll back a suspect deploy, shed or rate-limit load, scale out the saturated tier, or fail over. Restore service first, and keep the evidence (metrics, traces, a heap or thread dump) to continue investigating.
- Localize with distributed tracing (e.g. OpenTelemetry spans) to see which service and call dominate slow requests, then check that service's utilization, saturation, and errors for CPU, memory and GC pauses, disk, network, and thread and connection pools.
- Rank likely causes: a slow downstream (database, cache-miss storm) without timeouts, causing queues to build upstream; exhausted connection or thread pools; retry storms multiplying load; a hot partition or key; GC pauses; a noisy neighbor on a shared host.
- Confirm each hypothesis with evidence: correlate the latency curve with pool saturation or GC logs, compare a healthy instance with a slow one, reproduce under load in staging, or profile a live node with a flame graph. Change one variable at a time.
- After the fix, add the guardrail that would have caught it: an alert on the saturated resource (pool usage, queue depth, consumer lag), per-dependency timeouts set from measured p99, and a load test for the path. Write a blameless postmortem.
Follow-up
- Only p99 is up, not the median. What does that suggest? Tail-specific causes such as GC pauses, lock contention, one slow replica, or requests queuing behind a few large ones; inspect outlier traces per instance.
- How do retries make an outage worse? Each layer's retries multiply load on a struggling dependency; cap attempts, add exponential backoff with jitter, and use a retry budget or circuit breaker.
- What if only one instance is slow? Compare it with healthy peers (host metrics, disk, noisy neighbors, uneven load balancing, stale config) and drain it while you investigate.
Built from the rounds and topics Opera Solutions candidates report.
Prepare, practise & reflect
One practical outcome each day. Spend longer where you need it.
0 / 7 done01Map the Opera Solutions loop
- Write out the reported sequence: Initial Screening, Technical Assessment, Behavioral Interview, Multiple Rounds of Interviews.
- For each round, write one sentence on what it is judging, from the description above, and mark the one you are least ready for.
Deliverable: A one-page map of the 4 reported rounds, with the weakest marked.
02Work SQL
- Spend the session on SQL, which Opera Solutions candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in SQL and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in SQL.
03Work Data Structures
- Spend the session on Data Structures, which Opera Solutions candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in Data Structures and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in Data Structures.
04Work SQL JOINs
- Spend the session on SQL JOINs, which Opera Solutions candidates report being tested on.
- Write one worked example in SQL JOINs and time yourself on it.
Deliverable: One timed worked example in SQL JOINs.
05Answer out loud: Technical / Domain Questions
- Answer aloud, timed: What is the difference between a process and a thread?
- Answer aloud, timed: Explain various database normalization forms.
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Technical / Domain Questions question(s), under time.
06Answer out loud: Coding / Algorithms
- Answer aloud, timed: Write a function to reverse a linked list.
- Answer aloud, timed: How would you find the longest substring without repeating characters?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Coding / Algorithms question(s), under time.
07Answer out loud: Behavioral / Leadership
- Answer aloud, timed: Describe a challenging project you worked on and how you managed it.
- Answer aloud, timed: How do you prioritize your tasks when working on multiple projects?
Deliverable: Spoken answers to 2 reported Behavioral / Leadership question(s), under time.
Expand any day for tasks and deliverables. Your progress is saved on this device.
Behavioural rounds judge the decision you made and what it cost.
Describe a challenging project you worked on and how you managed it.
Describe a challenging project you worked on and how you managed it.
Approach
- Pick a project where you personally drove decisions and the difficulty was real: technical ambiguity, a tight deadline, a failing system, or unclear requirements. A good story shows ownership and judgment under pressure; the project need not be glamorous.
- Open with two sentences of context (what the project was, why it mattered, your role), then name the hardest part concretely, e.g. 'the nightly job had to handle ten times the data in the same window.'
- Spend most of your time on how you managed it: how you broke the work down, the key technical decision and the options you rejected, how you contained risk (prototypes, phased rollout, fallbacks), and how you kept stakeholders informed.
- Close the loop on the difficulty you named, e.g. whether the job now fit the window at ten times the volume, plus how far the date moved and what broke after launch. Say which decisions were yours and which came from the team.
- Finish with one concrete lesson you carried into later work. Leave out stories that blame others, lack real difficulty, or rest on technical details you can't explain in depth.
Follow-up
- How did you divide the work across the team? Explain how you matched tasks to people's strengths and how you tracked progress without micromanaging.
- What was the hardest technical decision? Be ready to lay out the options, the constraint or data that decided it, and whether it held up in production.
- What happened when the plan broke? Describe the moment it slipped, how you re-scoped or escalated, and how quickly you told the people depending on you.
How do you prioritize your tasks when working on multiple projects?
How do you prioritize your tasks when working on multiple projects?
Approach
- Show that you rank work by impact and deadlines rather than by who asked loudest, and that you make tradeoffs visible instead of silently dropping work: state your method in a sentence or two, then prove it with one real collision of projects.
- Lay out the method: list everything, rank by impact, urgency, and what unblocks other people, estimate effort, and separate hard deadlines from soft ones. Name the tool you actually use, such as a sprint board, a priority matrix, or a weekly plan.
- Show that you align with whoever owns priorities: when projects collide, take the conflict to your manager or the leads with a proposed order and its consequences, rather than deciding alone or promising everything.
- Give one concrete instance, e.g. 'a production bug landed during a feature deadline; I fixed the bug, told the feature owner it would slip two days, and delivered on the revised date.'
- Mention how you protect focus: batching small requests, blocking time for deep work, and answering 'not now, by Thursday' instead of yes to everything. 'I just work longer hours' or 'I take things as they come' shows no method at all.
Follow-up
- What if everything is marked urgent? Ask what happens if each item slips a week; the answers reveal the real order, which you confirm with whoever sets goals.
- Have you missed a deadline because of competing work? Own it, say when you raised the risk, and describe what you changed in how you plan.
- How do you handle interruptions from other teams? Triage fast: incidents get handled now, everything else goes into the queue with an expected date.
Can you give an example of a conflict you had in a team and how you resolved it?
Can you give an example of a conflict you had in a team and how you resolved it?
Approach
- Choose a disagreement about substance (a design choice, scope, review standards), not a personality clash, and show that you separated the issue from the person, listened, and reached a decision the team committed to.
- Present both positions fairly, stating the other person's view and reasons in a way they would sign off on; casting them as simply wrong or difficult makes the story about them rather than about how you work.
- Walk through the resolution: a one-on-one conversation, agreeing on the criteria that matter (latency, deadline, maintainability), gathering data or building a quick prototype, and escalating only if still stuck.
- Give the outcome and the state of the relationship afterward. It is fine if your idea lost; disagreeing, then committing fully to the decision, is a strong signal.
- Quantify where you can (e.g. 'the benchmark showed option B was three times faster, so we went with it') and close with what you now do earlier to head off similar conflicts.
Follow-up
- What if the other person was more senior? Explain how you made the case with data, accepted the final call, and wrote down the risk if you still disagreed.
- What if the same disagreement came back on the next project? Agree on a written team convention or design principle for that kind of decision so it isn't argued again each time.
- How did you keep the working relationship healthy? Mention a concrete follow-up, such as crediting their idea publicly or pairing on the next task.
What motivates you to perform your best work?
What motivates you to perform your best work?
Approach
- Give two or three specific motivators that are true for you, not a list of virtues; the point is whether what energizes you actually exists in this role.
- Back each motivator with evidence, e.g. 'I like measurable impact; my favorite project cut a report from hours to minutes.' A motivator without a story sounds rehearsed.
- Connect your motivators to what the job description says the role involves, so the interviewer sees the match instead of having to infer it.
- Pay or title as the headline motivator, a generic 'I love challenges', or a need the role plainly can't meet (such as total solo autonomy in a team-based role) all undercut the answer.
- Keep it to about a minute. Mentioning what drains you is fine if framed constructively, e.g. long stretches without user feedback, along with what you do about it.
Follow-up
- What demotivates you? Name something real but manageable and what you do about it, such as asking for clearer goals or seeking out user feedback.
- When did you do your best work? Pick a story that shows the motivators you just named, so the two answers reinforce each other.
- How do you stay motivated on tedious work? Mention automating the repetitive parts, tying the task to its outcome, or splitting it into visible milestones.
Tell us about a time when you had to learn a new technology quickly.
Tell us about a time when you had to learn a new technology quickly.
Approach
- Pick a real case with a deadline and a technology that was genuinely new to you, such as a language, framework, database, or cloud service; the story should show how you ramped up under time pressure and still shipped correct work.
- Say why speed mattered, e.g. 'I had two weeks to build a streaming consumer and had never used Kafka', then your learning strategy: official docs for the core model, a small throwaway prototype, and reading existing production code that uses it.
- Show how you contained risk while learning: asking an experienced colleague to review the design, starting with the simplest correct approach, writing tests around the unfamiliar parts, and being open about what you didn't know yet.
- Quantify the result (delivered on time, performance, issues after launch) and what came after, e.g. you wrote the team's setup notes or became the go-to reviewer for it.
- Avoid a story about copy-pasting until it worked, or about a technology you only touched briefly; name one you can explain in depth, down to how it behaves when it fails.
Follow-up
- What was hardest to understand? Name one specific concept (e.g. consumer group rebalancing) and how it finally clicked, whether through a prototype, the source code, or a colleague.
- How do you decide how deep to go? Learn enough to build and debug the task correctly, then go deeper where production problems or design decisions demand it.
- What would you do differently? Name a shortcut that cost you, like skipping the docs on failure behavior, and how you now cover that early.
If presented with conflicting requirements from different stakeholders, how would you handle it?
If presented with conflicting requirements from different stakeholders, how would you handle it?
Approach
- Conflicting requirements often hide a shared goal, so look for the need behind each request rather than picking a side or quietly building both. Lay out your process step by step, anchored on a real case if you have one.
- Start by understanding each requirement's underlying need: talk to each stakeholder separately, ask what problem it solves and what happens if it isn't met, and restate it back to confirm you understood.
- Make the conflict explicit: write down both requirements, the cost, schedule, and risk of each option, and any option that satisfies both, such as a configuration flag, phased delivery, or a different default.
- Get the decision from the right owner: bring stakeholders together, or escalate to whoever owns product priority, with your recommendation. The engineer's role is to frame the tradeoff clearly, not to settle business priorities alone.
- Record the decision and its rationale and confirm it with both sides so nobody is surprised at delivery. 'I'd build whatever the most senior person wants' dodges the conflict, and 'I'd do both' ignores the cost.
Follow-up
- What if neither stakeholder will compromise? Escalate to the shared decision owner with the options and consequences in writing, then commit to whatever they decide.
- What if requirements change again mid-build? Re-estimate, show the effect on dates, and get the new priority confirmed before switching work.
- How do you prevent this next time? Push for requirements to be reviewed together early, with one named owner who settles conflicts before work starts.
- 01
How do you handle memory management in your applications?
- 02
Describe a challenging project you worked on and how you managed it.
- 03
How do you prioritize your tasks when working on multiple projects?
- 04
Can you give an example of a conflict you had in a team and how you resolved it?
What is the typical difficulty level of the interviews?
The interviews at Opera Solutions are generally considered challenging. Candidates should be prepared to demonstrate both technical expertise and problem-solving abilities through coding challenges and technical discussions.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How long does the interview process typically take?
The interview process can vary in length but usually spans a few weeks, including multiple rounds of interviews. Candidates should be prepared for a thorough evaluation.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What differentiates successful candidates?
Successful candidates often excel in both technical skills and soft skills. They demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively, collaborate with teams, and think critically about problem-solving.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Is there a focus on remote work or hybrid expectations?
Opera Solutions supports flexible work arrangements, including remote and hybrid models, depending on team needs and project requirements.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What can I expect in terms of company culture?
The culture at Opera Solutions emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and continuous learning. Employees are encouraged to share ideas and contribute to the overall success of the company.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗How hard is the Opera Solutions interview?
Candidates most commonly rate Opera Solutions interviews as medium, based on 125 reported interviews. About 40% of candidates who interview go on to receive an offer.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗What topics does Opera Solutions test in interviews?
Opera Solutions interviews most often cover Data Structures, Logical Reasoning, Problem Solving Under Constraints, Excel, and Case Interviewing. The exact emphasis depends on the specific role you apply for.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Is Opera Solutions a good place to work?
Employees rate Opera Solutions 3.0 out of 5 overall, based on aggregated workplace reviews spanning career growth, work-life balance, compensation, culture, and management.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Where is Opera Solutions headquartered?
Opera Solutions is headquartered in Jersey City, NJ.
Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗Sources & methodology 3 sources ↗
Official role evidence, timestamped platform data and clearly labeled preparation advice.
- 01Opera Solutions Software Engineer candidate reports ↗
Company-reported rounds, questions and FAQ.
candidate · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 02PracHub Software Engineer practice ↗
PracHub practice material, not company-reported.
platform · Accessed 2026-09-22 - 03PracHub preparation framework ↗
PracHub preparation guidance.
platform · Accessed 2026-09-22